New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25703
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Black Orchid » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:05 pm

Geezus Brian and you say you aren't rude :roll: :roll: :roll:

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Neferti » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:11 pm

Neferti~ wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:38 pm
Outlaw Yogi wrote:
Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:27 pm
How come I never get sexually harassed? ... so I can be a #hash slag :P
Probably because you walk around, bare chested, with a wild boar draped across your shoulders????? :rofl

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by The Reboot » Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:04 pm

brian ross wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:15 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:39 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:31 am
The Reboot wrote:
Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:31 pm
A majority of the people voted for Tony Abbott, you know. In the US, they voted for Trump.. :rofl
Yes, more people voted for Tone Rabbit, so what? No, fewer people voted for Trump than Hillary - 61,201,031 voted for Trump, 62,523,126 voted for Hillary and 6,464,094 voted for "others". Trump won the Electoral College vote, which is the vote that determines who will be el Presidente' but no voter votes in the Electoral College. Funny how people won't recognise that Trump lost the 2016 popular vote. :roll:
Jeez this is one of the most demented debates I have ever engaged in. :rofl

How can I "provide evidence" on something I didn't claim? That's on you. You need to provide me evidence on where I claimed that you want to take away poster's rights. Get serious? Hardly. I'm in it for the shits and giggles, honey.
I guessed that 'cause when you're pressed for evidence you dismally fail to produce any. Makes me wonder why I shouldn't regard you as anything other than a troll, Reboot. Give me some proof that you won't suddenly run away when pressed to support your claims, it you're able to.
I have no idea what a "WOTFM" is. Seems you are desperately grasping at straws now.
Waste Of Time and Fucking Money. An old acronym which I learnt when in the Army. It describes you to a "t".
I don't need a monologue on why Trump and Abbott got in. Where's your evidence backing that Trump won the Electoral College vote that nobody voted in? Come Bwiny, get serious. Evidence, evidence, evidence!

Tut tut tut.
Oh, dearie, dearie, dearie, me. You desire evidence? Here it is:

US Election 2016 Results

You made a ridiculous claim, I refuted it. Tsk, tsk, such a WOFTM. :roll:
Yeah, pressed for evidence on something I never claimed in the first place. That was your fuck up, which you are conveniently ignoring. "Running away" one might say. :roll:

The claim I did make however, was that you're a hypocrite. There is plenty of evidence in this very thread. Open your eyeballs.. can't you read? Is English your second language, or are you that much of an indoctrinated sheep you don't realize how many times you contradicted yourself? :rofl

Let's put this in simple terms, for simple minds.

You accused me of making a claim I never actually made, due to your misreading and/or only interpreting how you wanted to, then attempted to use this as a source of attack. After that, you went your usual mocking route, and thought you were victorious when it's pretty clear you've made a fool of yourself. :rofl

"Hey Reboot, YOU SAID PIGS CAN FLY. NOW BACK THIS UP WITH EVIDENCE."

Me: :WTF

So that's what "WOFTM" means. Now you're resorting to personal attacks? Tut tut Bwiny, resorting to childish behaviour when you have nothing else?

Beats being a WOS (Waste-of-Space), so still one up on you. ;)

So you went to the trouble of googling to prove your point, you are easy to bait. I think it's time you took your meds and ran along back to the nursing home where you belong. Maybe after a diaper change you can share your delusional stories of being a commie war hero.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:56 am

Desperately clinging to a strawman while being thrashed from pillar to post is coping mechanism from Bri bri's school days with the 'brothers'. Hugging his imaginary friend takes him to his happy place and he can pretend he's not being fucked in the arse.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:44 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:05 pm
Geezus Brian and you say you aren't rude :roll: :roll: :roll:
Oh, I can be rude, Black Orchid, if I feel the necessity to be rude. It appears making a forceful point is considered by you to be rude, rather like how you classify IQ's crudeness as "freedom of speech", right? :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:45 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:04 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:15 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:39 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:31 am
The Reboot wrote:
Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:31 pm
A majority of the people voted for Tony Abbott, you know. In the US, they voted for Trump.. :rofl
Yes, more people voted for Tone Rabbit, so what? No, fewer people voted for Trump than Hillary - 61,201,031 voted for Trump, 62,523,126 voted for Hillary and 6,464,094 voted for "others". Trump won the Electoral College vote, which is the vote that determines who will be el Presidente' but no voter votes in the Electoral College. Funny how people won't recognise that Trump lost the 2016 popular vote. :roll:
Jeez this is one of the most demented debates I have ever engaged in. :rofl

How can I "provide evidence" on something I didn't claim? That's on you. You need to provide me evidence on where I claimed that you want to take away poster's rights. Get serious? Hardly. I'm in it for the shits and giggles, honey.
I guessed that 'cause when you're pressed for evidence you dismally fail to produce any. Makes me wonder why I shouldn't regard you as anything other than a troll, Reboot. Give me some proof that you won't suddenly run away when pressed to support your claims, it you're able to.
I have no idea what a "WOTFM" is. Seems you are desperately grasping at straws now.
Waste Of Time and Fucking Money. An old acronym which I learnt when in the Army. It describes you to a "t".
I don't need a monologue on why Trump and Abbott got in. Where's your evidence backing that Trump won the Electoral College vote that nobody voted in? Come Bwiny, get serious. Evidence, evidence, evidence!

Tut tut tut.
Oh, dearie, dearie, dearie, me. You desire evidence? Here it is:

US Election 2016 Results

You made a ridiculous claim, I refuted it. Tsk, tsk, such a WOFTM. :roll:
Yeah, pressed for evidence on something I never claimed in the first place. That was your fuck up, which you are conveniently ignoring. "Running away" one might say. :roll:

The claim I did make however, was that you're a hypocrite. There is plenty of evidence in this very thread. Open your eyeballs.. can't you read? Is English your second language, or are you that much of an indoctrinated sheep you don't realize how many times you contradicted yourself? :rofl

Let's put this in simple terms, for simple minds.

You accused me of making a claim I never actually made, due to your misreading and/or only interpreting how you wanted to, then attempted to use this as a source of attack. After that, you went your usual mocking route, and thought you were victorious when it's pretty clear you've made a fool of yourself. :rofl

"Hey Reboot, YOU SAID PIGS CAN FLY. NOW BACK THIS UP WITH EVIDENCE."

Me: :WTF

So that's what "WOFTM" means. Now you're resorting to personal attacks? Tut tut Bwiny, resorting to childish behaviour when you have nothing else?

Beats being a WOS (Waste-of-Space), so still one up on you. ;)

So you went to the trouble of googling to prove your point, you are easy to bait. I think it's time you took your meds and ran along back to the nursing home where you belong. Maybe after a diaper change you can share your delusional stories of being a commie war hero.
The WOFTM has chosen to continue to torture more electrons. Run along, Reboot, run along. You're just wasting out time with further waffle. Until you produce some evidence, you're just pissing into the wind. :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by The Reboot » Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:07 pm

brian ross wrote:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:45 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:04 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:15 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:39 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:31 am


Yes, more people voted for Tone Rabbit, so what? No, fewer people voted for Trump than Hillary - 61,201,031 voted for Trump, 62,523,126 voted for Hillary and 6,464,094 voted for "others". Trump won the Electoral College vote, which is the vote that determines who will be el Presidente' but no voter votes in the Electoral College. Funny how people won't recognise that Trump lost the 2016 popular vote. :roll:
Jeez this is one of the most demented debates I have ever engaged in. :rofl

How can I "provide evidence" on something I didn't claim? That's on you. You need to provide me evidence on where I claimed that you want to take away poster's rights. Get serious? Hardly. I'm in it for the shits and giggles, honey.
I guessed that 'cause when you're pressed for evidence you dismally fail to produce any. Makes me wonder why I shouldn't regard you as anything other than a troll, Reboot. Give me some proof that you won't suddenly run away when pressed to support your claims, it you're able to.
I have no idea what a "WOTFM" is. Seems you are desperately grasping at straws now.
Waste Of Time and Fucking Money. An old acronym which I learnt when in the Army. It describes you to a "t".
I don't need a monologue on why Trump and Abbott got in. Where's your evidence backing that Trump won the Electoral College vote that nobody voted in? Come Bwiny, get serious. Evidence, evidence, evidence!

Tut tut tut.
Oh, dearie, dearie, dearie, me. You desire evidence? Here it is:

US Election 2016 Results

You made a ridiculous claim, I refuted it. Tsk, tsk, such a WOFTM. :roll:
Yeah, pressed for evidence on something I never claimed in the first place. That was your fuck up, which you are conveniently ignoring. "Running away" one might say. :roll:

The claim I did make however, was that you're a hypocrite. There is plenty of evidence in this very thread. Open your eyeballs.. can't you read? Is English your second language, or are you that much of an indoctrinated sheep you don't realize how many times you contradicted yourself? :rofl

Let's put this in simple terms, for simple minds.

You accused me of making a claim I never actually made, due to your misreading and/or only interpreting how you wanted to, then attempted to use this as a source of attack. After that, you went your usual mocking route, and thought you were victorious when it's pretty clear you've made a fool of yourself. :rofl

"Hey Reboot, YOU SAID PIGS CAN FLY. NOW BACK THIS UP WITH EVIDENCE."

Me: :WTF

So that's what "WOFTM" means. Now you're resorting to personal attacks? Tut tut Bwiny, resorting to childish behaviour when you have nothing else?

Beats being a WOS (Waste-of-Space), so still one up on you. ;)

So you went to the trouble of googling to prove your point, you are easy to bait. I think it's time you took your meds and ran along back to the nursing home where you belong. Maybe after a diaper change you can share your delusional stories of being a commie war hero.
The WOFTM has chosen to continue to torture more electrons. Run along, Reboot, run along. You're just wasting out time with further waffle. Until you produce some evidence, you're just pissing into the wind. :roll:
Image

Weak as piss, Bwiny. Get your old man diapers changed then get back to me, darling. :roll: :roll:

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:42 pm

Image
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by The Reboot » Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:45 pm

Image

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:58 pm

Image
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests