New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

[The Reboot]

You see nothing wrong with a call to behead people? You see nothing wrong with burning the Australian flag and persecuting this lovely multicultural wet dream of a country in doing so?

No, I don't. You however, appear to have problems with people (peacefully) making a point. I wonder why?

"Freedom of speech" is your excuse for these imbeciles? Yet you insult the people on this board for exercising theirs, and then make a statement critisizing them for the same reason.

Would you care to quote me, with a link, where I have suggested that someone should lose their right to make a statement here, please? Here, this is even a spot where you can do it:

I look forward to reading your efforts or will you slink away like all my critics? People like you like to read what they like in what I type rather than what I actually type. Funny that, hey?

This has been an interesting and amusing discussion, Brian.

The irony..

Indeed. You appear to have missed it completely, hey?

I don't have a problem with people "peacefully" making a point. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You made no snide comments about that "peaceful protestor" holding up a sign that basically says "behead all who don't follow my prophet". That includes you, and me. Why no comments about how that tosser should run back to the playground, tut tut? Instead, you justified their actions.

I also have a problem with this. Case in point.



The person who drew this was raked under the coals in media, declared a racist bigot etc etc. Yet NOTHING (save for people similarly minded to the people YOU snipe on this forum) is said about a call for beheading...

Anything to say about the person who drew that picture? I look forward to your comments on this.

Ah, the ol'"lets change the subject, rather than address the points being made," trick, hey, Reboot? Really? Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Oh, and BTW, it is "raked over the coals" not "raked under the coals". Are you sure English isn't a second language to you?

Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:

I look forward to reading it. Or how about you just declare you were mistaken? Mmmmm?

Oh I can that too, Bwiny.

I never said anywhere that you posted that people's rights should be taken away. I merely pointed out your hypocrisy, which you also demonstrated in full view for everybody to see when you defended extremists waving a sign declaring to behead people, yet other forumites on here speak out against Islam or multiculturalism and here you are on your high horse demeaning them because it offends you and goes against your world views.

Oh and nice try. Raked over, under, who cares? The point still remains. Now who's changing the subject. You're nitpicking, grasping at straws, and recycling the same lines you use to attack cods with.

Tut Tut Bwiny.

[brian ross]

You see nothing wrong with a call to behead people? You see nothing wrong with burning the Australian flag and persecuting this lovely multicultural wet dream of a country in doing so?

No, I don't. You however, appear to have problems with people (peacefully) making a point. I wonder why?

"Freedom of speech" is your excuse for these imbeciles? Yet you insult the people on this board for exercising theirs, and then make a statement critisizing them for the same reason.

Would you care to quote me, with a link, where I have suggested that someone should lose their right to make a statement here, please? Here, this is even a spot where you can do it:

I look forward to reading your efforts or will you slink away like all my critics? People like you like to read what they like in what I type rather than what I actually type. Funny that, hey?

This has been an interesting and amusing discussion, Brian.

The irony..

Indeed. You appear to have missed it completely, hey?

I don't have a problem with people "peacefully" making a point. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You made no snide comments about that "peaceful protestor" holding up a sign that basically says "behead all who don't follow my prophet". That includes you, and me. Why no comments about how that tosser should run back to the playground, tut tut? Instead, you justified their actions.

I also have a problem with this. Case in point.



The person who drew this was raked under the coals in media, declared a racist bigot etc etc. Yet NOTHING (save for people similarly minded to the people YOU snipe on this forum) is said about a call for beheading...

Anything to say about the person who drew that picture? I look forward to your comments on this.

Ah, the ol'"lets change the subject, rather than address the points being made," trick, hey, Reboot? Really? Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Oh, and BTW, it is "raked over the coals" not "raked under the coals". Are you sure English isn't a second language to you?

Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:

I look forward to reading it. Or how about you just declare you were mistaken? Mmmmm?

Oh I can that too, Bwiny.

I accept your flag of surrender, Reboot.

I never said anywhere that you posted that people's rights should be taken away.

Did I state that? Nope. Care to try again with another excuse. We can all see exactly what you claimed, Reboot...

I merely pointed out your hypocrisy, which you also demonstrated in full view for everybody to see when you defended extremists waving a sign declaring to behead people, yet other forumites on here speak out against Islam or multiculturalism and here you are on your high horse demeaning them because it offends you and goes against your world views.

My "world views", my "offence"? Really? In reality, it is what the common number of people believe and say, Reboot. All you are attempting to do is reinforce behavour and views which are unacceptable in Australian society. Islamophobia/Racism/Xenophobia are considered bad viewpoints to hold, by the majority of people in Australia. Time you realised that you're on a losing wicket.

Oh and nice try. Raked over, under, who cares? The point still remains. Now who's changing the subject. You're nitpicking, grasping at straws, and recycling the same lines you use to attack cods with.

Funny, I haven't introduced anything new, beyond a criticism of your use of a common English idiom, Reboot. That you appear upset that you've been corrected suggests what about your assuredness? It appears you don't like being criticised. I wonder why?

Tut Tut Bwiny.

Indeed, Reboot. Funny how you've gone from the attack to the defence, all in the space of a few posts, hey? Appears you really aren't sure that I am wrong and you're right on all of this, right?

[Outlaw Yogi]

How come I never get sexually harassed? ... so I can be a #hash slag

[The Reboot]

No, I don't. You however, appear to have problems with people (peacefully) making a point. I wonder why?
Would you care to quote me, with a link, where I have suggested that someone should lose their right to make a statement here, please? Here, this is even a spot where you can do it:
I look forward to reading your efforts or will you slink away like all my critics? People like you like to read what they like in what I type rather than what I actually type. Funny that, hey?
Indeed. You appear to have missed it completely, hey?

I don't have a problem with people "peacefully" making a point. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You made no snide comments about that "peaceful protestor" holding up a sign that basically says "behead all who don't follow my prophet". That includes you, and me. Why no comments about how that tosser should run back to the playground, tut tut? Instead, you justified their actions.

I also have a problem with this. Case in point.



The person who drew this was raked under the coals in media, declared a racist bigot etc etc. Yet NOTHING (save for people similarly minded to the people YOU snipe on this forum) is said about a call for beheading...

Anything to say about the person who drew that picture? I look forward to your comments on this.

Ah, the ol'"lets change the subject, rather than address the points being made," trick, hey, Reboot? Really? Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Oh, and BTW, it is "raked over the coals" not "raked under the coals". Are you sure English isn't a second language to you?

Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:

I look forward to reading it. Or how about you just declare you were mistaken? Mmmmm?

Oh I can that too, Bwiny.

I accept your flag of surrender, Reboot.

I never said anywhere that you posted that people's rights should be taken away.

Did I state that? Nope. Care to try again with another excuse. We can all see exactly what you claimed, Reboot...

I merely pointed out your hypocrisy, which you also demonstrated in full view for everybody to see when you defended extremists waving a sign declaring to behead people, yet other forumites on here speak out against Islam or multiculturalism and here you are on your high horse demeaning them because it offends you and goes against your world views.

My "world views", my "offence"? Really? In reality, it is what the common number of people believe and say, Reboot. All you are attempting to do is reinforce behavour and views which are unacceptable in Australian society. Islamophobia/Racism/Xenophobia are considered bad viewpoints to hold, by the majority of people in Australia. Time you realised that you're on a losing wicket.

Oh and nice try. Raked over, under, who cares? The point still remains. Now who's changing the subject. You're nitpicking, grasping at straws, and recycling the same lines you use to attack cods with.

Funny, I haven't introduced anything new, beyond a criticism of your use of a common English idiom, Reboot. That you appear upset that you've been corrected suggests what about your assuredness? It appears you don't like being criticised. I wonder why?

Tut Tut Bwiny.

Indeed, Reboot. Funny how you've gone from the attack to the defence, all in the space of a few posts, hey? Appears you really aren't sure that I am wrong and you're right on all of this, right?

Surrender? If your delusions bring you comfort, honey, roll with it.

What drugs are you on, Bwiny?

You clearly stated here:

"Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:"

Then, you posted an empty space to be a smartarse, on two occasions and claimed I changed the subject. You give me proof on where I stated that you suggested people lose their posting rights. Where is your link? Here's another chance to prove your point.

Oh, and this is comedy gold:

"My "world views", my "offence"? Really? In reality, it is what the common number of people believe and say, Reboot. All you are attempting to do is reinforce behavour and views which are unacceptable in Australian society. Islamophobia/Racism/Xenophobia are considered bad viewpoints to hold, by the majority of people in Australia. Time you realised that you're on a losing wicket."

Especially after stating you saw nothing wrong with an Islamist extremist waving a sign about saying "BEHEAD ANYONE THAT DOESN'T AGREE WITH MY PROPHET" and defended the notion by stating "freedom of speech".

Don't you see a contradiction there?

Are you a sheep? If a majority of the people hold an opinion about something, does that mark the opposing opinion invalid by default?

A majority of the people voted for Tony Abbott, you know. In the US, they voted for Trump..

But thank you, Bwiny, for demonstrating your hypocrisy. It's been a blast.

[brian ross]

Surrender? If your delusions bring you comfort, honey, roll with it.

What drugs are you on, Bwiny?

You clearly stated here:

"Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:"

Then, you posted an empty space to be a smartarse, on two occasions and claimed I changed the subject. You give me proof on where I stated that you suggested people lose their posting rights. Where is your link? Here's another chance to prove your point.

I note still no proof, Reboot. Funny that, hey? Just as usual, claims which are not supported by evidence. Funny that, hey? Bluster? Yes, from you. Innuendo? Yes, from you. Look, when you want to get serious, get back to me. Until then, you're just pissing into the wind as far as I am concerned. Another blowhard who fails when put on the spot to produce any evidence. Tut, tut, what a WOFTM you're proving to be.

A majority of the people voted for Tony Abbott, you know. In the US, they voted for Trump..

Yes, more people voted for Tone Rabbit, so what? No, fewer people voted for Trump than Hillary - 61,201,031 voted for Trump, 62,523,126 voted for Hillary and 6,464,094 voted for "others". Trump won the Electoral College vote, which is the vote that determines who will be el Presidente' but no voter votes in the Electoral College. Funny how people won't recognise that Trump lost the 2016 popular vote.

[The Reboot]

Surrender? If your delusions bring you comfort, honey, roll with it.

What drugs are you on, Bwiny?

You clearly stated here:

"Now, where is your proof that I have ever suggested anyone should lose their posting rights? Where is your link? Here is another chance to prove your point:"

Then, you posted an empty space to be a smartarse, on two occasions and claimed I changed the subject. You give me proof on where I stated that you suggested people lose their posting rights. Where is your link? Here's another chance to prove your point.

I note still no proof, Reboot. Funny that, hey? Just as usual, claims which are not supported by evidence. Funny that, hey? Bluster? Yes, from you. Innuendo? Yes, from you. Look, when you want to get serious, get back to me. Until then, you're just pissing into the wind as far as I am concerned. Another blowhard who fails when put on the spot to produce any evidence. Tut, tut, what a WOFTM you're proving to be.

A majority of the people voted for Tony Abbott, you know. In the US, they voted for Trump..

Yes, more people voted for Tone Rabbit, so what? No, fewer people voted for Trump than Hillary - 61,201,031 voted for Trump, 62,523,126 voted for Hillary and 6,464,094 voted for "others". Trump won the Electoral College vote, which is the vote that determines who will be el Presidente' but no voter votes in the Electoral College. Funny how people won't recognise that Trump lost the 2016 popular vote.

Jeez this is one of the most demented debates I have ever engaged in.

How can I "provide evidence" on something I didn't claim? That's on you. You need to provide me evidence on where I claimed that you want to take away poster's rights. Get serious? Hardly. I'm in it for the shits and giggles, honey.

I have no idea what a "WOTFM" is. Seems you are desperately grasping at straws now.

I don't need a monologue on why Trump and Abbott got in. Where's your evidence backing that Trump won the Electoral College vote that nobody voted in? Come Bwiny, get serious. Evidence, evidence, evidence!

Tut tut tut.

[Serial Brain 9]

Looks like Brian has become entangled in his web of deceit

[Valkie]

Looks like Brian has become entangled in his web of deceit

Being an islamophile has seriously rotted the few synapses he had.

Soon he will be drooling on the keyboard and unable to post.

[Neferti]

How come I never get sexually harassed? ... so I can be a #hash slag

Probably because you walk around, bare chested, with a wild boar draped across your shoulders?????

[brian ross]

A majority of the people voted for Tony Abbott, you know. In the US, they voted for Trump..

Yes, more people voted for Tone Rabbit, so what? No, fewer people voted for Trump than Hillary - 61,201,031 voted for Trump, 62,523,126 voted for Hillary and 6,464,094 voted for "others". Trump won the Electoral College vote, which is the vote that determines who will be el Presidente' but no voter votes in the Electoral College. Funny how people won't recognise that Trump lost the 2016 popular vote.

Jeez this is one of the most demented debates I have ever engaged in.

How can I "provide evidence" on something I didn't claim? That's on you. You need to provide me evidence on where I claimed that you want to take away poster's rights. Get serious? Hardly. I'm in it for the shits and giggles, honey.

I guessed that 'cause when you're pressed for evidence you dismally fail to produce any. Makes me wonder why I shouldn't regard you as anything other than a troll, Reboot. Give me some proof that you won't suddenly run away when pressed to support your claims, it you're able to.

I have no idea what a "WOTFM" is. Seems you are desperately grasping at straws now.

Waste Of Time and Fucking Money. An old acronym which I learnt when in the Army. It describes you to a "t".

I don't need a monologue on why Trump and Abbott got in. Where's your evidence backing that Trump won the Electoral College vote that nobody voted in? Come Bwiny, get serious. Evidence, evidence, evidence!

Tut tut tut.

Oh, dearie, dearie, dearie, me. You desire evidence? Here it is:

US Election 2016 Results

You made a ridiculous claim, I refuted it. Tsk, tsk, such a WOFTM.