New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:01 am

The Reboot wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:43 pm
brian ross wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:03 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:18 pm
brian ross wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:28 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 5:13 pm
This is what happens when you get your qualifications from a box of cornflakes.
Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Uncalled for reboot. Are you jealous 'cause you don't have any qualifications at all? :roll: :roll:
That's assuming I don't have them, honey. Maybe I do, but don't feel the need to brag about them as part of some holier-than-thou argument against others. Tut tut. You run along to the playground now. You've been a good little boy and eaten your cornflakes with soy milk. Tsk tsk. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Not proud of your achievements, if any, then, Reboot? How unsurprising. You just like to snipe at other people. Funny that, hey? :roll:
I have nothing to prove to anybody, sweetheart. There is a saying about those who are loudest are usually full of shit.
Really? I find that those that make quiet careful annoucements of their achievements are usually the real deal. I don't boast, I make statements, nothing more.
I.e when some men go on about how big their dicks are, it usually means that it's the size of a toothpick.

This metaphor applies to people on the internet who try to make themselves look good, when in reality they have insecurity.
Like the guy who has a complex about his masculinity when his wang is below average.

I once had an opinion on OzPol about something you disagreed with. You responded with that tired, arrogant "tut tut" and eyeroll and personally attacked me.
What is it they say, "Pot meet kettle"? :lol:

I rejoin OzPol 5 years later and... surprise! You haven't changed a bit.

Such bragging rights you have there, dearie. :roll:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me. What a shame you haven't changed then, hey? No real "Reboot" as far as you're concerned, right?

My "tut, tuting" is a consequence of reading the same tired old Racist/Islamophobic/Xenophobic bullshit, year after year from the same fools who make those remarks. To them, biological determinism rules supreme. Shame Genetics proves them wrong, time after time. They hate people who look different/act different/worship different religions to what they approve of. To them, skin colour determines intelligence and how people act, rather than whether or not some people just have a darker tan than others. There is more genetic differences within each so-called "racial" group than between them. We all share the same genetic pool, it is what makes us all one species, Homo Sapien Sapiens. It is what allows us all to interbred with one another, no matter what the colour of our skin, the shape of our eyes or any other physical difference they dream up.

Time they caught up with the 85% of Australians who support Multiculturalism and stopped pinning for a past which is long gone. They however, never learn, no matter how much proof is put in front of them, they just refuse to look or understand how much their views are past. :roll: :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:37 am

You must have been concentrating on flicking through the tattered remains of your well used Alinsky tome and missed the drop to 75% in a more recent survey.

Here's the thing about stats and surveys, even your own source finds that 64+% agree people coming to Australia should change their behaviour for starters. Is it because you don't understand statistics or surveys that you insist on embarrassing yourself trying to thrown one down as a trump card?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:02 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:37 am
You must have been concentrating on flicking through the tattered remains of your well used Alinsky tome and missed the drop to 75% in a more recent survey.

Here's the thing about stats and surveys, even your own source finds that 64+% agree people coming to Australia should change their behaviour for starters. Is it because you don't understand statistics or surveys that you insist on embarrassing yourself trying to thrown one down as a trump card?
There is no significant statistical change in opinion on Multiculturalism, IQ:

Image
Source]

Australians like and agree with Multiculturalism overwhelmingly, despite what you appear to believe. 85% like it.
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Valkie
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Valkie » Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:28 am

The Reboot wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 5:13 pm
This is what happens when you get your qualifications from a box of cornflakes.
Now, now.

Behave.....

Everybody knows that bwyannnnnnnn

Knows all
Sees all
Has been everywhere
Done everything
And
Is indisputably the most perfect individual on earth........in his own mind :yahoo :yahoo
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by The Reboot » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:26 pm

brian ross wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:01 am
The Reboot wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:43 pm
brian ross wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:03 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:18 pm
brian ross wrote:
Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:28 pm


Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Uncalled for reboot. Are you jealous 'cause you don't have any qualifications at all? :roll: :roll:
That's assuming I don't have them, honey. Maybe I do, but don't feel the need to brag about them as part of some holier-than-thou argument against others. Tut tut. You run along to the playground now. You've been a good little boy and eaten your cornflakes with soy milk. Tsk tsk. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Not proud of your achievements, if any, then, Reboot? How unsurprising. You just like to snipe at other people. Funny that, hey? :roll:
I have nothing to prove to anybody, sweetheart. There is a saying about those who are loudest are usually full of shit.
Really? I find that those that make quiet careful annoucements of their achievements are usually the real deal. I don't boast, I make statements, nothing more.
I.e when some men go on about how big their dicks are, it usually means that it's the size of a toothpick.

This metaphor applies to people on the internet who try to make themselves look good, when in reality they have insecurity.
Like the guy who has a complex about his masculinity when his wang is below average.

I once had an opinion on OzPol about something you disagreed with. You responded with that tired, arrogant "tut tut" and eyeroll and personally attacked me.
What is it they say, "Pot meet kettle"? :lol:

I rejoin OzPol 5 years later and... surprise! You haven't changed a bit.

Such bragging rights you have there, dearie. :roll:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me. What a shame you haven't changed then, hey? No real "Reboot" as far as you're concerned, right?

My "tut, tuting" is a consequence of reading the same tired old Racist/Islamophobic/Xenophobic bullshit, year after year from the same fools who make those remarks. To them, biological determinism rules supreme. Shame Genetics proves them wrong, time after time. They hate people who look different/act different/worship different religions to what they approve of. To them, skin colour determines intelligence and how people act, rather than whether or not some people just have a darker tan than others. There is more genetic differences within each so-called "racial" group than between them. We all share the same genetic pool, it is what makes us all one species, Homo Sapien Sapiens. It is what allows us all to interbred with one another, no matter what the colour of our skin, the shape of our eyes or any other physical difference they dream up.

Time they caught up with the 85% of Australians who support Multiculturalism and stopped pinning for a past which is long gone. They however, never learn, no matter how much proof is put in front of them, they just refuse to look or understand how much their views are past. :roll: :roll:
Genetics has fuck all to do with it. It is social engineering that is the issue.

There's never going to be a peaceful wonderland, such notion is extremely dumb and naive, despite your holier-than-thou government approved social engineering. Your "racism" is only a minor part of that, which blatantly tells me you're a racist in reverse.

You are quick to tar the users on Ozpol and here whom you disagree with, with the same brush.

What of those racial groups you stick up for, and alternate religions you stick up for? They get a free pass from you because your brainwashing dictates that they are oppressed.

Anything to say about the below images?

Image

Image

Why is it you only snipe people of white and/or Christian descent and background?

What's the difference between Islam and Christianity anyway? Both are organized religions, both have doctrines that go against the nature of your leftwing doctrines... and if your response is, "Culture" I am going to laugh my arse off. :rofl

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:44 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:26 pm
brian ross wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:01 am
Oh, dearie, dearie, me. What a shame you haven't changed then, hey? No real "Reboot" as far as you're concerned, right?

My "tut, tuting" is a consequence of reading the same tired old Racist/Islamophobic/Xenophobic bullshit, year after year from the same fools who make those remarks. To them, biological determinism rules supreme. Shame Genetics proves them wrong, time after time. They hate people who look different/act different/worship different religions to what they approve of. To them, skin colour determines intelligence and how people act, rather than whether or not some people just have a darker tan than others. There is more genetic differences within each so-called "racial" group than between them. We all share the same genetic pool, it is what makes us all one species, Homo Sapien Sapiens. It is what allows us all to interbred with one another, no matter what the colour of our skin, the shape of our eyes or any other physical difference they dream up.

Time they caught up with the 85% of Australians who support Multiculturalism and stopped pinning for a past which is long gone. They however, never learn, no matter how much proof is put in front of them, they just refuse to look or understand how much their views are past. :roll: :roll:
Genetics has fuck all to do with it. It is social engineering that is the issue.

There's never going to be a peaceful wonderland, such notion is extremely dumb and naive, despite your holier-than-thou government approved social engineering. Your "racism" is only a minor part of that, which blatantly tells me you're a racist in reverse.

You are quick to tar the users on Ozpol and here whom you disagree with, with the same brush.
I identify their arguments for what they are, You apparently have problems with people being told they are spouting Racism when they spout, well, Racism. If you want them to stop spouting Racism, tell them, don't attack me for correctly identifying their arguments for what they are.

Biological determinism believes that because of the amount of Melanin in a person's skin, they are more or less intelligent than other people. Genetics prove that to be false. We are all drawn from the same Genetics pool. We all share the same Genes. Skin colour/lip thickness/the presence of epicanthic folds on the eye/etc. are superficial adaptations to specific environmental factors caused by evolution, nothing more.
What of those racial groups you stick up for, and alternate religions you stick up for? They get a free pass from you because your brainwashing dictates that they are oppressed.
I am not brainwashed. I am sorry for you that you see an effort to defend people against unfair and unnecessary persecution is wrong. I really do.
Anything to say about the below images?

Image

Image
I see people exercising their right to Freedom of Speech. I don't see a problem with either group. Flag burning is a legitimate political statement. Holding up signs - peacefully - is as well. If they decide to move beyond that to violence, then I will speak out against them. People here like to parrot on about the right to Freedom of Speech but they are awfully quick to call for those exercising it with messages they disagree with to be silenced.
Why is it you only snipe people of white and/or Christian descent and background?
Because there are few, if any non-White and/or non-Christian people on the web. Funny how it's hard to attack someone when there is no one there making stupid statements, now isn't it, Reboot?
What's the difference between Islam and Christianity anyway? Both are organized religions, both have doctrines that go against the nature of your leftwing doctrines... and if your response is, "Culture" I am going to laugh my arse off. :rofl

Oh, I agree, I agree. Organised religion is as Marx suggested, an "opiate of the masses." :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:58 pm

The Reboot wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:26 pm
Why is it you only snipe people of white and/or Christian descent and background?
If it's white and Christian opposing threats and violence that's very bad and they must be shut down by calling them names.

If it's other than white and Christian and wants to cut our heads off it's Freedom of Speech and very good.

Go figure.

User avatar
Valkie
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Valkie » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:35 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:58 pm
The Reboot wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:26 pm
Why is it you only snipe people of white and/or Christian descent and background?
If it's white and Christian opposing threats and violence that's very bad and they must be shut down by calling them names.

If it's other than white and Christian and wants to cut our heads off it's Freedom of Speech and very good.

Go figure.
They call it freedom of speech, but it only works if you are not white.

Whites cop a flogging even when they speak the truth
they are shut down with rabid screams of racist, islamaphobe, bigot etc etc

And yet they don't see the hypocrisy of their statements.

Its quite ok to insult whites.....because we can take it.
But even question blacks, abbos, muzzos pooftahs or lezzos and you are shouted down.

Must be because they are so insecure that they are terrified of shutting up and actually listening.

Reminds me of something I read in the hitchikers guide to the galaxy.
They have to keep screaming and shouting
or
their brains might engage and they will see just how stupid they are.
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream

User avatar
Valkie
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Valkie » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:41 pm

I see people exercising their right to Freedom of Speech. I don't see a problem with either group. Flag burning is a legitimate political statement. Holding up signs - peacefully - is as well. If they decide to move beyond that to violence, then I will speak out against them. People here like to parrot on about the right to Freedom of Speech but they are awfully quick to call for those exercising it with messages they disagree with to be silenced.
Hmmmm
I wonder what would happen if I burned their flag or toilet paper book?

The idiots burn the flag of the people that feed, house, and give them money

Just a small amount of respect
A tiny word of thanks
a little bit of contributing to the nation.

But no, they take our money, my money, and throw insults at me and mine.

If its so bad, then they can simply PISS ORF, they are not wanted and will not be missed.

It would be interesting to see the abbos survive without white man looking after them and giving them everything.
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:44 pm

The message on the signs was far from peaceful, it was violent and hideous, as was the 'riot'. Isn't that the point of a sign? The message on it? I see nothing peaceful about it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests