Can Someone tell the UN to

[Serial Brain 9]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35eEljsSQfc[/youtube]

BOOM!

That is a brilliant clip Sprint.

UN exposed for allowing systematic ethnic cleansing in Arab Nations.

[cods]

Srebrenica massacre: Dutch soldiers let 300 Muslims die, court rules
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... ourt-rules

bri bri's version of history is totally different to everyone elses....amazing that...

he basically claims CHristians have not learnt a thing over the centuries....we are still as bad as in the dark ages....

that way he can be a bleeding heart and turn a blind eye to what is happening TODAY...


the UN Stopped the Balkans WAR...

[sprintcyclist]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35eEljsSQfc[/youtube]

BOOM!

That is a brilliant clip Sprint.

UN exposed for allowing systematic ethnic cleansing in Arab Nations.

yes, I bet he got no answer.

Is the resident islamic going to answer?

[brian ross]

Srebrenica massacre: Dutch soldiers let 300 Muslims die, court rules
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... ourt-rules

bri bri's version of history is totally different to everyone elses....amazing that...

he basically claims CHristians have not learnt a thing over the centuries....we are still as bad as in the dark ages....

that way he can be a bleeding heart and turn a blind eye to what is happening TODAY...


the UN Stopped the Balkans WAR...

"Stopping" means movement is arrested, Cods. It does not equate to "preventing". The UN stopped the Balkans war, which was underway. You really do have a poor understanding of English. Is it your second language?

[brian ross]

The real ones, Cods. The UN is powerless to actively stop an ongoing war. It can only stop a war if and when the participants are willing to stop.

I COULD STOP A WAR IF THE PARTICIPANTS ARE WILLING TO STOP...... WHAT A STOOOPID THING TO CLAIM..

Why is it "stupid", Cods? The UN has provided peace-keeping forces for numerous conflicts - most successful. Why? 'Cause the participants didn't want hostilities to continue. Where they failed, they had either inadequate forces to stop the conflict breaking out again or the participants weren't interested in stopping and restarted the conflict. Rwanda is a fine example of that. You know, where Christians committed Genocide on one another because of tribal differences?

The only person being "stupid" here is you, I would suggest.

The UN is a very very expensive toothless tiger.....that people like you who make up your own history keep pompuss ineffective pratts in a job....

In part I agree with you but the UN was set up to be a "toothless tiger" in 1945. It is what it's member states have made it, including Australia, Cods. When it has had strong leadership, it has done well. When it has had weak leadership, when faced with Superpower rivalry, it has done badly. Overall, it's performance has been adequate. It has not military forces of it's own, it has no means of deploying military force. It was originally set up as a diplomatic talking shop. It's real power resides in the Security Council where the big five - the USA, Russia, the PRC, the UK and France all have veto power (in otherwords they can render any resolution null and void). Guess which country has used it's veto the most since 1945? The USA. Funny that, hey?

I bet you couldn t name any of them without google.....

Bet you can't either, Cods, can you?

I can however name the first President of the UN General Assembly. Can you? He was an Australian - Herbert Vere Evatt the "Doc" of the ALP. What he envisaged for the UN didn't come to pass because the memberstates didn't want it to. Funny how it is the memberstates which again rear their heads, isn't it?

You want the UN to be more than what it was originally intended to be, Cods. You want a world government. I don't. I am happy with a diplomatic talking shop. It works reasonably well as that. The UN is not a world government and never will be. Australia's membership is important to Australia, despite what you believe. Anything Australia has allowed the UN to do, it has done because it saw value in doing it.

your a fool... they rely on people like you to keep them in business.

I am a realist. I also know how to use the quote function. You might want to learn it.

[cods]

I am a realist. I also know how to use the quote function. You might want to learn it



no your not! your a forum NAZI who stooops to the lowest level.... usually name calling...or put downs....to take the heat off himself..

I stand by my words YOUR A FOOL.. who cannot see past his own reflection...

[brian ross]

I am a realist. I also know how to use the quote function. You might want to learn it

no your not! your a forum NAZI who stooops to the lowest level.... usually name calling...or put downs....to take the heat off himself..

Nope. I never resort to name calling, Cods. Nor am I a "forum NAZI". I do use put downs. However only after someone has insulted me first. Just as you have now. You simply refuse to read and learn. I have many years study is this area, Cods. What do you have? Any qualifications at all? I wrote my honours thesis on Australian foreign policy and the UN. I know what I am talking about. You appear to be, well, I suppose I could resort to name calling but hey, what's the point? We all know what you are.

I stand by my words YOUR A FOOL.. who cannot see past his own reflection...

I think you mean "YOU'RE" not "YOUR", Cods. Run along dear. I get your message anyway. You dislike someone who is more knowledgeable than you and who can argue their case. Tut, tut.

[IQS.RLOW]

The UN has provided peace-keeping forces for numerous conflicts - most successful. Why?

Perhaps "success" means sexual violence and the raping of children in Bri bri's magical kingdom?
http://theconversation.com/the-un-has-a ... rape-78429

[IQS.RLOW]

Nope. I never resort to name calling,

who is more knowledgeable than you and who can argue their case.

Bri Bri also thinks irony is an adjective used for describing an iron.

[Valkie]

bring on a war with the indo monkeys.

Two nukes and its all over rover.

Just think
No more millions or billions of dollars wasted on parasites.
No more baot people
no more Bali

couldnt think of a better outcome.

Australia possesses no "Nukes".

Australia pays for the help that Indonesia furnishes in the matter of people smuggling and Islamist Terrorism.

Bali furnishes an outlet for Australia's population to experience a different culture (two actually) and provides the Indonesians a way to earn Australian dollars.

And you can believe what you like.
Even though we have nuke capable ships aircraft and weaponry.

We pay protection money so that the slimy indos don't keep sending more worthless parasites.
It woukd be far cheaper to use the boats for target practice.

And there are plenty of better, more civilized, healthier and friendly places to go than the shite hole Indonesia.
I wouldn't go there if it was free.
Filthy place full of filthy people.