Politically Correct ADF undermining security

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
BigOl64
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 8:53 pm

Politically Correct ADF undermining security

Post by BigOl64 » Mon Jun 04, 2018 10:31 pm

I get how the social justice nut jobs focus a lot of their efforts in destroying the ADF and its culture. But when push come to shove is it really what we want for our country's security?



AUSTRALIA’S GI Jane’s are failing to meet the army’s fitness requirements with only one in 10 getting through basic infantry training.

The Australian Defence Force has targeted women but just 24 of the 154 who signed up to go into battle since 2016 have actually managed to join a combat unit.

The 10 full-time female soldiers have been posted to the 1st Battalion of the Royal Australian Regiment in Townsville.

The other 14 reservists have been posted to different units.

Former Army officer Bernard Gaynor said: “The Army’s politically-correct plan to open infantry and other combat roles to women is a complete failure.”

Last year The Daily Telegraph revealed the ADF had sent out weekly targets to recruiters that showed no targets for men in 35 of 50 Army positions with the instruction to “recruit immediately” if a woman came forward for combat roles.

Australian Defence Force figures released to senate estimates show that 10 women joined the Army’s female-only pre-conditioning program aimed at getting them fit enough to start regular training but two dropped out.

Just 72 of the 152 women recruited to be infantry soldiers who started recruit training at Kapooka managed to pass the basic course. Of those, only 24 were able to complete the infantry’s basic initial employment training course at Singleton.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/ ... 93343b6d34

User avatar
BigP
Posts: 4970
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm

Re: Politically Correct ADF undermining security

Post by BigP » Fri Jun 08, 2018 8:57 am

Their only condition of entry should be that they can give a half decent blowjob,

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Politically Correct ADF undermining security

Post by Black Orchid » Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:53 am

Personally I don't think women should be enlisted in direct combat roles. Like it or not women and men are built differently and men, in general, have more endurance and strength.

If a women earns her place in direct combat that's great but to concentrate on enlisting women over men is lunacy.

User avatar
BigP
Posts: 4970
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm

Re: Politically Correct ADF undermining security

Post by BigP » Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:03 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:53 am
Personally I don't think women should be enlisted in direct combat roles. Like it or not women and men are built differently and men, in general, have more endurance and strength.

If a women earns her place in direct combat that's great but to concentrate on enlisting women over men is lunacy.

People need to understand that men and women have different roles, and not try and make them interchangeable

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Politically Correct ADF undermining security

Post by boxy » Sat Jun 09, 2018 3:05 pm

I don't see the problem. If they pass the fitness test, they're in, if not, too bad. That's the way it's supposed to work...
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests