sprintcyclist wrote:BigOl64 wrote:sprintcyclist wrote:Water here has a different value that it does in NZ.
Out West, it has a different value too. I've been there and lived it.
Water is not a topic there, water is the topic.
Overseas coys can make any commitment they want on employment, it won't wash.
'Mitigating circumstances' will arise .........
Sell an asset to an overseas coy, they will take full advantage.
In the case of the Great Artesian Basin, we can't afford that.
We will not win over an Indian company buying our coal.
What has NZ got to do with Adani and Central QLD?
The are a mining company from a foreign land they will have the same laws and rules as every other foreign company mining coal in QLD, in fact they have some of the strictest rules of any company operating in the basin.
Who ever is feeding you your info, you need to stop listening to then. This is NOT a conspiracy, Adani is not out to get us, they are just another mining company making money out of a plentiful resource.
Everyone needs to calm down and take a big toke on the reality pipe.
As a separate issue, what do you think they do with that water, that they would empty out the Artesian Basin?
Adani will find ways around the laws and commitments. they have many lawyers employed to do that.
Adani is out to benefit Adani.
If you have not experienced an Aussie drought, you don't appreciate water how I do.
Yes, they will drain the basin . They have been told they can do that.
Well I understand mining and I understand how foreign companies operate in the QLD mining environment.
Im not sure what you think they intend to do with that water, in a lot of cases mines need to get rid of water, but you seem to think that even with the strictest of environmental conditions, they will take all they need and then for some reason, pump out vastly more than that, but you haven't explained what you think they will do with it. They can't use it, and they can't just pump it out on the ground.
Im all for holding foreign mining companies accountable, but I can't seem to work out what you think they will do with millions of gigalitres that they don't need, but for some reason pump out of the ground. Can you please gives us an idea?
I get how big number can get people worked up, but lets keep things in perspective shall we.
The Carmichael mine’s 12,000ML forecasted use (equivalent to 4% of the water extracted from the Great Artesian Basin in Queensland last year) would put it alongside the biggest annual users of Great Artesian Basin water, such as the Olympic Dam copper and uranium mine in South Australia, which currently draws 10,000ML each year.
Despite a net yearly decrease of 286,000ML in the water stored within the Great Artesian Basin, it is in no danger of running dry. The past 120 years of exploitation have used up less than 0.1% of the water stored.
https://theconversation.com/why-does-th ... ater-75923
It will use a lot of water, but not all of it, And if it puts the Hunter Valley out of business, think of that real farming land being made available.