Double Dissolution

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:11 pm

Things I've pointed out that Bolt agrees with in his article.
1/The government argues that the polls flatter Labor and come the election, voters will reject an Opposition that won't turn back the boats, cut spending or axe its planned carbon tax. There is only 1 poll that counts.
2/The government argues it's making the hard decisions now to fix the Budget and has still 2 years left to make voters feel better. Like most governments do.
3/It didn't schedule the MH17 disaster. Sure, its free trade deals with China, Japan, and South Korea are huge wins. And yes it has handled them brilliantly. Yet to be seen but they didn't mishandle them.
4/To many voters this packed foreign agenda will increasingly seem an evasion from their domestic priorities.
5/What Media Strategy? I blame Credlin.
6/There is little sign of a long term selling strategy for everything from the Budget to the Trade deals. This is deadly given the ferocious hatred of Abbott in the media Left, especially the massive ABC. Check out Monday's Q&A, which even one participant, Malcolm Turnbull agreed was another "Abbott hatefest". And what is the Liberal strategy for calling outABC bias? Yes, yes, yes and yes. Even your hero recognises it for what it is. :roll:
7/Stop playing nice. I suggest you read all of that one direct from the actual article.
8/The government has picked too many fights it simply cannot win and, which risks making it seem hapless. It must ditch the undoable, argue only for what it can win. Yep, again Credlin.
9/The Minister most admired by the Left Wing media, Malcolm Turnbull. Yep.
10/ Treasurer Joe Hockey must lift. But is weighted down by ideology from Cormann and Robb. Perhaps they should make Turnbull Treasurer.
11/Fresher faces - women particularly - are also needed. But advancement only on merit.
12/It's one big moral cause is the constitutional recognition of Aborigines, which is of marginal interest and divisive. Yep, I won't vote for it they are already recognised as Australians like the rest of us.
13/Labor is great at funding interest groups to say it is wonderful. Yep.

So you see Skip the actual article is not all doom and gloom at all. it's a call to action, which is why the DT title is totally appropriate...

Dust yourself off and fight...
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by skippy » Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:56 pm

Rorschach wrote:The DT has the Andrew Bolt column/page and the large title at the top says..
and I quote...

Dust yourself off and fight

Are you looking at the blog and not the article?
Could it be that different papers make up different titles and Andrew Bolt has no say in it?
We'll the DT may have tried to fluff it up a bit but as you can see when you read my post and link for the first time Bolt wrote the title I used. :roll:
Which brings me back to the gist of the matter, even the most right wing media writer in the country knows Abbott's government are in dire straights.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:05 pm

skippy wrote:
Rorschach wrote:The DT has the Andrew Bolt column/page and the large title at the top says..
and I quote...

Dust yourself off and fight

Are you looking at the blog and not the article?
Could it be that different papers make up different titles and Andrew Bolt has no say in it?
We'll the DT may have tried to fluff it up a bit but as you can see when you read my post and link for the first time Bolt wrote the title I used. :roll:
Which brings me back to the gist of the matter, even the most right wing media writer in the country knows Abbott's government are in dire straights.
Honestly Skip as much as you'd like it he doesn't concede that at all.
Obviously different titles were used in different states Skip... picked by the particular editor or sub editor. Your title is one of the first lines in the DT article not the TITLE... but the real point is his article is about Dusting themselves off and fighting back... now them is fighting world not words of capitulation. Isn't it so? Isn't that what the article is actually about?

BTW I read the actual article not the edited blog version. Try it sometime.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:09 pm

Here is the actual title of the column as submitted for publication...

Column - What Abbott must do to survive

No matter what the title is the column is about what Bolt thinks they need to do to win. You don't win by giving in or capitulating.

meanwhile back on topic... should there be a DD? What would you do in Abbott's shoes?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by skippy » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:11 pm

Rorschach wrote:
skippy wrote:
Rorschach wrote:The DT has the Andrew Bolt column/page and the large title at the top says..
and I quote...

Dust yourself off and fight

Are you looking at the blog and not the article?
Could it be that different papers make up different titles and Andrew Bolt has no say in it?
We'll the DT may have tried to fluff it up a bit but as you can see when you read my post and link for the first time Bolt wrote the title I used. :roll:
Which brings me back to the gist of the matter, even the most right wing media writer in the country knows Abbott's government are in dire straights.
Honestly Skip as much as you'd like it he doesn't concede that at all.
.
I quoted Bolts own article, not a DT knock off. If Bolt didn't want what I quoted as the title why did he write it? Or are you now claiming he didn't write his own title even when it says right next to it. By Andrew Bolt really? He should sue there is a law against that. :?

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by skippy » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:13 pm

Rorschach wrote:
meanwhile back on topic... should there be a DD? What would you do in Abbott's shoes?
What would you do?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:28 pm

I already answered that question a few posts back.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:32 pm

skippy wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
skippy wrote:
Rorschach wrote:The DT has the Andrew Bolt column/page and the large title at the top says..
and I quote...

Dust yourself off and fight

Are you looking at the blog and not the article?
Could it be that different papers make up different titles and Andrew Bolt has no say in it?
We'll the DT may have tried to fluff it up a bit but as you can see when you read my post and link for the first time Bolt wrote the title I used. :roll:
Which brings me back to the gist of the matter, even the most right wing media writer in the country knows Abbott's government are in dire straights.
Honestly Skip as much as you'd like it he doesn't concede that at all.
.
I quoted Bolts own article, not a DT knock off. If Bolt didn't want what I quoted as the title why did he write it? Or are you now claiming he didn't write his own title even when it says right next to it. By Andrew Bolt really? He should sue there is a law against that. :?
I don't know what you quoted.... but it wasn't the actual article I read... looks to me like it was the edited blog summary that Sol quoted.
Do you know how newspapers work? Editors supply titles mostly.
Same as front pages.... :roll:
I already posted what Bolt called it originally. He wrote a column, the column name was... did you miss that too?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:32 pm

skippy wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
skippy wrote:
Rorschach wrote:The DT has the Andrew Bolt column/page and the large title at the top says..
and I quote...

Dust yourself off and fight

Are you looking at the blog and not the article?
Could it be that different papers make up different titles and Andrew Bolt has no say in it?
We'll the DT may have tried to fluff it up a bit but as you can see when you read my post and link for the first time Bolt wrote the title I used. :roll:
Which brings me back to the gist of the matter, even the most right wing media writer in the country knows Abbott's government are in dire straights.
Honestly Skip as much as you'd like it he doesn't concede that at all.
.
I quoted Bolts own article, not a DT knock off. If Bolt didn't want what I quoted as the title why did he write it? Or are you now claiming he didn't write his own title even when it says right next to it. By Andrew Bolt really? He should sue there is a law against that. :?
I don't know what you quoted.... but it wasn't the actual article I read... looks to me like it was the edited blog summary that Sol quoted.
Do you know how newspapers work? Editors supply titles mostly.
Same as front pages.... :roll:
I already posted what Bolt called it originally. He wrote a column, the column name was... did you miss that too?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Double Dissolution

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:33 pm

Rorschach wrote:Here is the actual title of the column as submitted for publication...

Column - What Abbott must do to survive

No matter what the title is the column is about what Bolt thinks they need to do to win. You don't win by giving in or capitulating.

meanwhile back on topic... should there be a DD? What would you do in Abbott's shoes?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests