I want it to cause you as much lack of sleep as it seems to cause skippy.IQS.RLOW wrote:Then you will have no problem naming names then...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9dd1/e9dd18aa62151c4ebc86f5f0650f59786f6cff92" alt="biblebasher :pope"
I want it to cause you as much lack of sleep as it seems to cause skippy.IQS.RLOW wrote:Then you will have no problem naming names then...
You should just buy another taxi to keep you occupied in your dotage, since you will never, ever get your hands on this Forum, ever again.Aussie wrote:I want it to cause you as much lack of sleep as it seems to cause skippy.IQS.RLOW wrote:Then you will have no problem naming names then...
I hear Uber is looking for new drivers. Sounds perfect for you.Neferti~ wrote:You should just buy another taxi to keep you occupied in your dotage, since you will never, ever get your hands on this Forum, ever again.Aussie wrote:I want it to cause you as much lack of sleep as it seems to cause skippy.IQS.RLOW wrote:Then you will have no problem naming names then...
People are not stupid. Nothing in that platform characterised you. People do not trust you for very good reason. When questioned, you deflect with word games.aussie wrote:1. Not one of you saw through the satirical farce that was my platform. It was almost word for word the same platform AiA, NOIQ, SN, Mantra. Neferti, skippy, TG of IK, Hebe, Sappho BO, and Mellie voted for two years ago. That proves, among other things, how dumb having a platform really is.
You were asked several times but you repeatedly deflected by demanding that Skippy name his intended Mod first. This is what you do. Why should they keep pushing when the end result is always the same?aussie wrote:2. No-one pushed me to reveal who I had intended appointing as a Moderator. It was Monk. Having him there would have gone a long way to re-uniting the two Boards and his IT knowledge would have filled any gaps I still have in that regard.
Why bother saying that now? You were asked about why you suddenly changed your mind about banning IQ but, in your usual style, you ignored the question and continued your deflection strategy. Trying to get you to answer a straight question with honesty and a straight answer is like trying to sculpt with shaving cream.aussie wrote:3. I gave an undertaking that if I won, I would not ban NOIQ. It was Monk who insisted on that, not as part of any deal, but as advice I accepted from someone I was going to appoint as Moderator.
Your 'reality' is skewed. People have told you what honest steps to take if you wish to have a real shot at winning the Admin election in the future. Trickery and deceit obviously don't work, wot?aussie wrote: My comments are based on the reality of what happened, not emotion.
I commend your honesty aussie. Never too late.Aussie wrote:Now I'll bring some things to your attention.
1. Not one of you saw through the satirical farce that was my platform. It was almost word for word the same platform AiA, NOIQ, SN, Mantra. Neferti, skippy, TG of IK, Hebe, Sappho BO, and Mellie voted for two years ago. That proves, among other things, how dumb having a platform really is.
2. No-one pushed me to reveal who I had intended appointing as a Moderator. It was Monk. Having him there would have gone a long way to re-uniting the two Boards and his IT knowledge would have filled any gaps I still have in that regard.
3. I gave an undertaking that if I won, I would not ban NOIQ. It was Monk who insisted on that, not as part of any deal, but as advice I accepted from someone I was going to appoint as Moderator.
4. skippy. I am not upset as you keep telling me I am. This is not real life. My comments are based on the reality of what happened, not emotion.
1. I didn't even look at or read the "platform" you posted as I had no intention of voting for you, so cared less what you had to say.Aussie wrote:Now I'll bring some things to your attention.
1. Not one of you saw through the satirical farce that was my platform. It was almost word for word the same platform AiA, NOIQ, SN, Mantra. Neferti, skippy, TG of IK, Hebe, Sappho BO, and Mellie voted for two years ago. That proves, among other things, how dumb having a platform really is.
2. No-one pushed me to reveal who I had intended appointing as a Moderator. It was Monk. Having him there would have gone a long way to re-uniting the two Boards and his IT knowledge would have filled any gaps I still have in that regard.
3. I gave an undertaking that if I won, I would not ban NOIQ. It was Monk who insisted on that, not as part of any deal, but as advice I accepted from someone I was going to appoint as Moderator.
4. skippy. I am not upset as you keep telling me I am. This is not real life. My comments are based on the reality of what happened, not emotion.
Neferti~ wrote:1. I didn't even look at or read the "platform" you posted as I had no intention of voting for you, so cared less what you had to say. Makes these platforms all the more useless.Aussie wrote:Now I'll bring some things to your attention.
1. Not one of you saw through the satirical farce that was my platform. It was almost word for word the same platform AiA, NOIQ, SN, Mantra. Neferti, skippy, TG of IK, Hebe, Sappho BO, and Mellie voted for two years ago. That proves, among other things, how dumb having a platform really is.
2. No-one pushed me to reveal who I had intended appointing as a Moderator. It was Monk. Having him there would have gone a long way to re-uniting the two Boards and his IT knowledge would have filled any gaps I still have in that regard.
3. I gave an undertaking that if I won, I would not ban NOIQ. It was Monk who insisted on that, not as part of any deal, but as advice I accepted from someone I was going to appoint as Moderator.
4. skippy. I am not upset as you keep telling me I am. This is not real life. My comments are based on the reality of what happened, not emotion.
2. I guessed you would have Monk, Annie or Mantra as your Mod/s. I actually posted that in this thread.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/polanimal/view ... ow#p160298 No you used a very broad brush and said this ~ I presume that you want to appoint the likes of annielaurie, monk, mantra, ele or some other leftard to do your "secretarial/housekeeping" crap.
3. I would prefer Monk be banned. You didn't win, so IQ stays, regardless of what you think. If Monk decides to leave, good. Even better if both of you decide to go far, far away. You may well get your wish. I doubt you'll see ele or annie either.
4. Bullshit. Yeas.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests