ACT introduces Marriage Equality Bill

[IQS.RLOW]

In fact I think I'll get 6 more wives. Would you deny me the same right?

Glutton for punishment, IQ's?

People can have as many wives as they like anyway. Divorce, re-marry. They seem quite happy to shit all over the "'til death do you part" part of marriage these days. So spare me the tears.

No no no. We all want to be married to each other. The girls are all bisexual.
If love is the only definer for you dumb lefty fucks, then you should have no problems with polygamous marriage or even incestual marriage.

[Rorschach]

In fact I think I'll get 6 more wives. Would you deny me the same right?

Glutton for punishment, IQ's?

People can have as many wives as they like anyway. Divorce, re-marry. They seem quite happy to shit all over the "'til death do you part" part of marriage these days. So spare me the tears.

That would be mainly limiting marriage to just the religious ceremonies and those celebrant weddings with that particular vow, then boxy.

[boxy]

In fact I think I'll get 6 more wives. Would you deny me the same right?

Glutton for punishment, IQ's?

People can have as many wives as they like anyway. Divorce, re-marry. They seem quite happy to shit all over the "'til death do you part" part of marriage these days. So spare me the tears.

No no no. We all want to be married to each other. The girls are all bisexual.
If love is the only definer for you dumb lefty fucks, then you should have no problems with polygamous marriage or even incestual marriage.

I have no real problem with polygamous marriages. What's your objection?

Incestuous unions, however, have bad consequences on the genetic integrity of any resulting children. That's bad, m'kay.

[IQS.RLOW]

I'm sure there could be some sterility clauses in the new marriage document.

As for polygamous marriage, monogamous societies have fewer social problems but I'm sure you lefties will be able to sort that out with some of your whizz bang social engineering that you have been so successful with in the past.

Maybe free masturbation machines for those lower socio-economically inclined men who can't get a gal because the successful conservative males have all the good jerbs and have stolen all yer wimmens because without the constraints of societal norms that you leftys have thrown away so haphazardly, the most successful mates will get all the gals.

It's mainly for the benefit of the leftists. We can have you going around committing rapes and crimes simply because you are unsuccessful at life in general. Having all the girls as well as all the money is even too cruel for us conservatives to inflict on you poor wretched leftys.

[boxy]

Do try not to troll so hard.

[IQS.RLOW]

Do try not to troll so hard.

So you agree or not?

[Chard]

Well now the election is over and hopefully all the election crap is at an end... I'm back... only to find crap from Chard.

This should be amusing. At a glance I'm seeing backpeddling, moving goal posts, more appeals to religious bullshit...

You are wrong.... you lied.
I never ran away and have never said gay people are not human beings... you said i did. STRAWMAN/lie.

You said that an apple cannot be equal to an orange. What else is that supposed to mean in context of gay marriage other than saying that gays cannot be equal to straights? It's not my fault you're a fucking idiot that doesn't understand what a direct compassion is. That is what an "apples vs oranges" statement is, you fucking dolt.

You also seem to have missed to point i was making re apples and oranges etc. But then this seems to be a major failing of yours in many debates. The question is... is this a personal or cultural problem.

Yes, it's a cultural problem stemming from me having an education and you being a dumbfuck that can't even get that apples<oranges = gays<straights. Fuck, do schools even exist down there?

Marriage is defined and has traditionally been for eon the union of a man and a woman... not a man and a man or woman and a woman. Apples and oranges.

Marriage as defined where? Also, definition change. Also, way to reinforce my argument that you really do believe that gays are somehow less than straights.

You want to create a term

Why create a new term when one already exists, you hatfucking retard.

If I play Golf, I'm not playing Football. No one would confuse the two, or want to call one the other. Except you perhaps Chard.

Only you're not saying "I'm going to play golf today instead of football", you lying dipshit. You're saying "Football is not the same as golf and therefore cannot be equal to golf".

[Black Orchid]

This is getting ridiculous. No-one said gays aren't human.

Apples/oranges both fruit but also different. Males/females/hermaphrodites all human but also different. To most people it doesn't mean that one is any less than the other. Just different.

[Rorschach]

Oh dear... Sorry Chard, but it seems the problem might indeed just be yours... not mine, not IQ's, not BO's

Don't you think it is more likely, that just YOU don't understand, instead of the person who actually made the point originally?

Seems to me everyone else has understood.

Yes, it's a cultural problem stemming from me having an education and you being a dumbfuck that can't even get that apples<oranges = gays<straights. Fuck, do schools even exist down there?

But I never said that at all.

Why create a new term when one already exists, you hatfucking retard.

Why not call apples, oranges, or golf, football. They are all exactly the same right?

You're saying "Football is not the same as golf and therefore cannot be equal to golf".

Really?
But I said.
"If I play Golf, I'm not playing Football. No one would confuse the two, or want to call one the other. Except you perhaps Chard."

[IQS.RLOW]

I think you'll have to beat the dumb fuck near to death with his own strawman before he understands.

I don't think he understands what a strawman is...