Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by freediver » Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm

It means you need a parliament.

Aussie

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by Aussie » Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:42 pm

freediver wrote:It means you need a parliament.
A 'parliament' hey. With real 'sitting MPs' in it or just computer terminals to act as these 'delegates?'

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by Rorschach » Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:51 pm

Participatory democracy has a long history. One instance is the Haudenosaunee confederacy (also known as the Iroquois confederacy) which operates under the oldest surviving constitution in the world. It is a common practice of non-civilized peoples and tribal nations.
In 8th and 7th century Ancient Greece, the informal distributed power structure of the villages and minor towns began to be displaced with collectives of Oligarchs seizing power as the villages and towns coalesced into city states. This caused much hardship and discontent among the common people, with many having to sell their land due to debts, and even suffer from debt slavery. At around 600BC the Athenian leader Solon initiated some reforms to limit the power of Oligarchs and re-establish a partial form of participatory democracy with some decisions taken by a poplar assembly composed of all free male citizens. About a century later, Solon's reforms were further enhanced for even more direct involvement of regular citizens by Cleisthenes. Athenian democracy came to an end in 322BC.
When democracy was revived as a political system about 2000 years later, decisions were made by representatives rather than by the people themselves. A minor exception to this was the limited form of direct democracy which flourished in the Swiss Cantons from the later Middle Ages. In the late 19th century a small number of thinkers including Oscar Wilde and Emma Goldman began advocating for increased participatory democracy. It was in the 20th century that practical implementations of participatory democracy once again began to take place, albeit mostly on a small scale, attracting considerable academic attention from the 1980s.
In the 1980s, the profile of participatory democracy within academia was raised by James S. Fishkin, the professor who introduced the deliberative poll. Experiments in forms of participatory democracy that took place within a wider framework of representative democracy began in cities around the world, with an early adopter being Brazil's Porto Alegre. A World Bank study found that participatory democracy in these cities seemed to result in considerable improvement in the quality of life for residents.
Political variants of participatory democracy include:

* Anticipatory democracy
* Consensus democracy
* Deliberative democracy
* Demarchy
* Direct democracy
* Grassroots democracy
* Non-partisan democracy
* Sociocracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_democracy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by freediver » Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:01 pm

Great, you swallowed a dictionary.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by Rorschach » Sun Sep 15, 2013 8:26 pm

I was expecting something like that.
I was also hoping it wouldn't come... but... let me tell you my prepared answer for such a comment.

I'm just trying to bring others up to speed. To my level of understanding if you like. Not everyone, including myself, are up to speed on everything.

If I post information, it is just because I am trying to bring people up to speed on the topic...
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by Aussie » Sun Sep 15, 2013 8:36 pm

Rorschach wrote:I was expecting something like that.
I was also hoping it wouldn't come... but... let me tell you my prepared answer for such a comment.

I'm just trying to bring others up to speed. To my level of understanding if you like. Not everyone, including myself, are up to speed on everything.

If I post information, it is just because I am trying to bring people up to speed on the topic...
It is, of course, beyond your comprehension or even contemplation that others are already 'up to speed,' and more than likely in every case, well beyond your 'level of understanding,' and even if they aren't, they too know how to google.

:f

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by freediver » Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:27 pm

Very generous of you. What do you think of voting by delegable proxy?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by Rorschach » Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:53 pm

Aussie wrote:
Rorschach wrote:I was expecting something like that.
I was also hoping it wouldn't come... but... let me tell you my prepared answer for such a comment.

I'm just trying to bring others up to speed. To my level of understanding if you like. Not everyone, including myself, are up to speed on everything.

If I post information, it is just because I am trying to bring people up to speed on the topic...
It is, of course, beyond your comprehension or even contemplation that others are already 'up to speed,' and more than likely in every case, well beyond your 'level of understanding,' and even if they aren't, they too know how to google.

:f
sigh.... I was expecting this from you... you fail to disappoint.

I expect quite a few to be up to speed perhaps not those asking certain questions though. :rofl
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by Rorschach » Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:59 pm

freediver wrote:Very generous of you. What do you think of voting by delegable proxy?
not at all...

Would you care to explain how it differs from representative democracy, where an elected member represents the wishes of an electorate or state?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Democracy: Participatory vs Representational

Post by freediver » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:00 pm

Sure. Under representative democracy, bills need support from over 50% of sitting MPs to pass. Under a delegable proxy system, they need support from 50% of the population. They could theoretically pass with only one MP in support. In this regard the system is much closer to direct democracy. It probably ticks all the boxes from the definition you gave.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests