Diana's Love: just days after being engaged

[frenchyjen70]

'Do-not-publish' Princess Diana photo up for auction in US

"A PREVIOUSLY unseen press photo of an apparently teenaged Princess Diana that a London tabloid deemed too hot to publish is coming up for auction in the United States later this month.

The black-and-white image from the dawn of the 1980s shows Diana, possibly in a ski chalet, smiling at the camera as she lies comfortably in the lap of a like-aged but unidentified young man reading a book.

By the window stands a bottle of Johnnie Walker whisky, but more intriguing are the words "not to be published" scrawled across the photo with the kind of grease pencil used by newspaper picture editors at the time.

On the back, the photo is dated February 26, 1981 - two days after Buckingham Palace announced the engagement of Prince Charles and the commoner then known as Diana Spencer.


Bobby Livingstone of RR Auctions of Amherst, New Hampshire said the photo comes from the private Caren Archive, which acquired it seven years ago when it bought out the photo library of Britain's Daily Mirror newspaper.

Livingstone said by telephone that the 20 by 25 centimeter photo would typically sell for around $1,000, "but because it has that not-to-be-published marking on it, we expect it to go for much more."

"It captures the moment when the engagement had been announced two days before and the press was going mad over Diana - but the Daily Mirror just wasn't going to publish this picture of her in a comfortable position with a man other than Prince Charles," he said.

Internet bidding on the photo and others - including a rare autographed portrait of Albert Einstein by a New York society photographer - will run from January 17 through 24.

Diana died in a Paris car crash in August 1997, a year after her divorce from Charles. She was 36."
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/world/d ... 6547026818" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[AiA in Atlanta]

Wasn't it thought Diana was a virgin when she married? Well, a photo of her sitting on a boy's lap doesn't prove that she wasn't and certainly she must have had other admirers other than the dreadful Charles. How old was she then? Just a kid, right?

[Rorschach]

FFS... who cares?

[AiA in Atlanta]

FFS... who cares?

Oddly, millions.

[Neferti]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments

[Rorschach]

FFS... who cares?

Oddly, millions.

prove it...!

I don't.

[AiA in Atlanta]

FFS... who cares?

Oddly, millions.

prove it...!

She was the most photographed woman of her generation.

[AiA in Atlanta]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments

Am sure the hunt is on for the identity of the bookworm who is using Diana to prop up his novel.

[Neferti]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments

Am sure the hunt is on for the identity of the bookworm who is using Diana to prop up his novel.

They reckon it is her brother, Charles (Earl Spencer). Who knows? Looks pretty innocent to me, no idea why all the fuss but it is the Daily Mail.

[boxy]

Is this harvey again, with yet another misleading thread title? The photo was taken before she even met Charles, not "just days after being engaged".