Africans are really retarded, low IQ? They're making PINK lip tattoos.

[Rorschach]

Shooting the messenger?
Did you even bother to read the article? No?
Try refuting some facts....

And yes "storypick" one of many online sources with an article by a well known authority that backs me and the others I've quoted up.

Criticism by Prof. Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard
Stephen Jay Gould, an evolutionary biologist, paleontologist, and a historian of science, had spent a considerable amount of time as a professor at Harvard, denied the accuracy of IQ test in his book, The Mismeasure of Man (1981). According to the arguments put forward by Gould, the human intelligence is not just a single entity which could be measured in terms of mathematical number or be graded according to score.

BTW he and many others are supported by the latest study of Intelligence and the IQ Test. I also posted info on that and you both deny the validity and truth of it.

[FLEKTARN]

Using prominent characters to try and push a point upon the people ordinarily indicates that one has a very tiny dick, a peenie weenie. Men with very big cocks usually keep it limited and are confident enough to not give a bs.

[BigP]

Using prominent characters to try and push a point upon the people ordinarily indicates that one has a very tiny dick, a peenie weenie. Men with very big cocks usually keep it limited and are confident enough to not give a bs.

What if you have an average sized dick ?

[FLEKTARN]

Using prominent characters to try and push a point upon the people ordinarily indicates that one has a very tiny dick, a peenie weenie. Men with very big cocks usually keep it limited and are confident enough to not give a bs.

What if you have an average sized dick ?

Then probably it is best to keep quiet haha.

[rhino]

One more time for the dummies...

The idea that intelligence can be measured by IQ tests alone is a fallacy according to the largest single study into human cognition which found that it comprises of at least three distinct mental traits.

IQ tests have been used for decades to assess intelligence but they are fundamentally flawed because they do not take into account the complex nature of the human intellect and its different components, the study found.

The results question the validity of controversial studies of intelligence based on IQ tests which have drawn links between intellectual ability race, gender and social class and led to highly contentious claims that some groups of people are inherently less intelligent that other groups.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 25911.html

IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence, according to a study which found that a minimum of three different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.

The IQ test is an exam most of us are familiar with, regardless of whether we have taken it or not. The test was originally designed by the French psychologist Alfred Binet in the early 1900s. But in the new millennium, is the IQ test still an effective means of measuring general intelligence? According to the general consensus, the answer is "no."

Ah, I remember you being in denial about Binet....

Intelligence is defined as general cognitive problem-solving skills. Since the days of Binet, psychologists have agreed that intelligence is much more complex than a single number and may be in fact divided into many subcategories. This is where the IQ test falls short. A Canadian study published online in the journal Neuron concluded that the IQ test is “fundamentally flawed,” seeing that its questions “grossly oversimplify the abilities of the human brain.”

The report identified three indications of human intelligence: short term memory, reasoning skills, and verbal ability. None of these skills are at all accurately measured in the traditional IQ test. So what does the IQ test accurately measure? Well according to Laci Green, host of DNews, “What the IQ test did measured was how well Westerners might do in Western schools.”

While the IQ test may give an indication of general intelligence, it can't measure the entire complexity of the human thought process. Creativity, emotional sensitivity, social understanding, and various acquired skills such as music or art, are excluded from test’s measurements of intelligence. If you’d like to get an idea of your IQ take this test, but just remember that whatever your score be, it doesn’t necessarily define how smart you really are.

Though IQ is used as a way to steadily measure intelligence, it’s not without its fall-backs. One major misconception people have about IQ is the belief that, when one measures a person’s IQ, they’re getting a complete and thorough view of the mental capabilities of that person. In fact, this belief is unutterably wrong. Howard Gardner, a Psychologist at Harvard, described IQ tests as being verbally biased and skewed by language:

IQ tests are not without personal bias as well, Scott Barry Kaufman, Ph.D, briefly describes the fact that the test-makers and test administrators cannot fully block out past experiences, leading to bias. It’s worth noting that test results can even vary from test to test, making them very inexact.

IQ tests measure very specific abilities, at a very specific instance in a person’s life, and applying the score as a broad measure of lifelong intelligence is silly. Many Intelligence researchers are steering tests away from the single score IQ and more towards a multiple scored “cognitive ability” tests.

Apparently, the IQ test is designed in a manner that emphasizes on skills that are important to certain societies. For instance, Australian Aboriginal children, raised in the deserts scored well on a test meant to assess visual memory but not in the IQ test.

Visual memory is more important for these people than anything else as they need to find their ways through the desert.
The intelligence quotient test is based on arbitrary standards set by man and is not written in stone.

https://www.storypick.com/iq-test/

The studies, the reports, the facts and opinions go on and on and on... I studied educational psychology... when I tell you something about this its because I have actually studied it.

You still arent getting it, Im not talking about traditional IQ tests and never was. I think yours may be in dispute if you dont start reading what is posted. Culturally unbiased QI tests reveal a difference between the races, blacks are lower. This is irrefutable.

[Rorschach]

Sorry you are wrong...

You need to start reading what other people say and stop trying to move the posts...." oh its not IQ tests, I'm talking about IQ tests" puhlease.

I have never wavered on my points which btw are 100% correct.

Africans as a people/negroid race are not retarded. I have clearly shown that.
IQ is not a measure of real intelligence, I have shown that.

Your argument is some form of flawed eugenics/racist claptrap. You need to wake up and address reality which disproves you stupid belief.

I refuse to post a billion examples to prove anecdotally I and most people in the field are correct as someone once expected. I have posted enough examples. I have refuted and proved that IQ is not a measure of intelligence and that intelligence takes many different forms... but you and the rest of the racists just refuse to acknowledge the truth.

So STOP WASTING MY TIME.

[Rorschach]

Here is a good article you should all read.
I understand both sides of it.
But as with the current scientific beliefs about IQ and intelligence and race and all the information and practices etc I learned in Educational Psychology, I whole-heartedly agree that your race is not a factor in determining your intellegence. That being "black" or African does not mean you will be retarded or should simply be considered so because of your racial heritage.

https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/t ... id=3386384

[FLEKTARN]

Here is a good article you should all read.
I understand both sides of it.
But as with the current scientific beliefs about IQ and intelligence and race and all the information and practices etc I learned in Educational Psychology, I whole-heartedly agree that your race is not a factor in determining your intellegence. That being "black" or African does not mean you will be retarded or should simply be considered so because of your racial heritage.

https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/t ... id=3386384

For someone who "learned" edu. psychology you know nothing about races and IQ. And it's not spelled "intellegence".

It's "intelligence". What are you mate, Australian, or a negrito? Spit out the fking stone.

Point out one gypsy who invented or did anything important for society or the world.

[brian ross]

One Gypsy? How about Jérémie Victor Opdebec?

[Rorschach]

https://www.geni.com/projects/Romani-Gy ... bles/13111
LOL

Oh dear whilst eating breakfast, watching The Insiders, reading the paper and checking election results, and various posts here, it appears I made a typo in one post...
Considering it was a word I know how to spell and considering I've never spelled it incorrectly before, I'm going to forgive myself just this once....