This is the islam people defend.

[billy the kid]

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-07/ ... a/11054020

Why is the ABC suddenly promoting islam under the guise of "free speech" articles...
This incident was two years ago..why drag it up...as though all Australians are guilty and should
be reminded...
The bottom line is Australia is waking up to islam.....and we dont like it......
End of story.....

[Black Orchid]

No idea! She's gone and good riddance.

[billy the kid]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video ... hura-video

Tell me theyre not insane.......

[Black Orchid]

Three men have been found guilty of engaging in a terror act by burning a suburban Melbourne mosque.

A Supreme Court jury today returned the verdict for Abdullah Chaarani, Ahmed Mohmed and Hatim Moukhaiber who had stood trial charged with crimes over the burning of the Imam Ali Islamic Centre at Fawkner on December 11, 2016.

The court was closed shortly after the verdict was returned as Moukhaiber said “you are dogs” to the jury and members of the public started calling out.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victor ... efa4b8dbae



Looks pleased with himself

[billy the kid]

https://www.memri.org/tv/children-phila ... al-torture

Wonder how much of this is being taught in Australia.....we'd never know, would we.....

[billy the kid]

https://eclj.org/free-speech/echr/la-ce ... pedophilie
So let me get this straight...the Court censors blasphemy against islam..but the Austrian Government closes down mosques
and deports 60 imams....
Does the left hand know what the right is doing....

This court case started in 2012...
The defendant has a petition with 50000 signatures demanding the right to criticize islam....
She has appealed to the Grand Chamber of the European Court against the decision of the Austrian Court...
Her offense...she dared, as a lecturer, to compare mohammeds "involvement" with his child wife aisha as
"pedophilia"....

Summary of the facts
In 2013, the Austrian Supreme Court sentenced a woman for publicly questioning: “a man of fifty-six with a six-year-old girl (...) What is it, if not paedophilia?” The speaker, recalling proven historical facts, spoke in front of thirty people at a seminar entitled “Elementary Knowledge of Islam” She wanted to warn about the practice of marriage of prepubescent girls in the muslim culture, following the example of muhammad who had married six year-old Aisha and consummated this marriage when she reached 9 years. She was denounced by a journalist present in the room, then convicted on the basis of a criminal provision prohibiting blasphemy in substance.
Finally, this decision was dictated by the fear of Muslims. The Court expressly says so: the Austrian authorities were right to condemn these remarks in order to preserve the “religious peace” in Austrian society. The criterion of acceptability of a speech is no longer the truth but the violence it can arouse. Moreover, it is not so much the violence of the contentious statement as the potential of those who claim to be offended which delimits the freedom of expression. On this account, a few excited only have to declare themselves offended and to be threatening to justify the censorship of their opponents.

This is the very reason (in bold) that the Australian politicians tell us how Australia is the most successful multicultural
country in the world.....to preserve religious peace........
By lying to the people........
Who was it that said.."if you tell them a lie often enough...theyll believe it..."

[Nicole]

I can’t type. I’m that angry. Thanks for bringing this to attention, billy. Keep fighting the good fight!

[billy the kid]

I can’t type. I’m that angry. Thanks for bringing this to attention, billy. Keep fighting the good fight!

[sprintcyclist]

https://eclj.org/free-speech/echr/la-ce ... pedophilie
So let me get this straight...the Court censors blasphemy against islam..but the Austrian Government closes down mosques
and deports 60 imams....
Does the left hand know what the right is doing....

This court case started in 2012...
The defendant has a petition with 50000 signatures demanding the right to criticize islam....
She has appealed to the Grand Chamber of the European Court against the decision of the Austrian Court...
Her offense...she dared, as a lecturer, to compare mohammeds "involvement" with his child wife aisha as
"pedophilia"....

Summary of the facts
In 2013, the Austrian Supreme Court sentenced a woman for publicly questioning: “a man of fifty-six with a six-year-old girl (...) What is it, if not paedophilia?” The speaker, recalling proven historical facts, spoke in front of thirty people at a seminar entitled “Elementary Knowledge of Islam” She wanted to warn about the practice of marriage of prepubescent girls in the muslim culture, following the example of muhammad who had married six year-old Aisha and consummated this marriage when she reached 9 years. She was denounced by a journalist present in the room, then convicted on the basis of a criminal provision prohibiting blasphemy in substance.
Finally, this decision was dictated by the fear of Muslims. The Court expressly says so: the Austrian authorities were right to condemn these remarks in order to preserve the “religious peace” in Austrian society. The criterion of acceptability of a speech is no longer the truth but the violence it can arouse. Moreover, it is not so much the violence of the contentious statement as the potential of those who claim to be offended which delimits the freedom of expression. On this account, a few excited only have to declare themselves offended and to be threatening to justify the censorship of their opponents.

This is the very reason (in bold) that the Australian politicians tell us how Australia is the most successful multicultural
country in the world.....to preserve religious peace........
By lying to the people........
Who was it that said.."if you tell them a lie often enough...theyll believe it..."

So the threat of violence by muslims mean they get whatever they want?

[sprintcyclist]

Fraser Anning will fix that