Outlaw Yogi wrote:
This is far as I've read, and as much as I need to know about the cavern in your skull.
My design is not "linear".
Now go copulate yourself halfwit!
Wayne wrote: so the truth comes out. You flog another man's invention and call it your own.
Can't you comprehend what you read idiot?!
All these devices are "induction" operated and require an external electrical input.
My invention relies solely on magnetic repulsion of 2 north poles on opposing magnets, and requires no external energy input of any sort.
If you understood the Linear Motor diagrams, you'd notice that they have north and south poles facing the rotor next to one another. My device has no south poles facing the rotor.
Laithwaite's design requires electronic control of current to the magnets facing the rotor so that one pulls and the next one pushes. I thought of that idea when I was 10, told my father and he said "It's already been done".
Years later I saw the concept used in rail guns. A typical assault rifle's projectile travels at around 2800ft per sec, any reasonable hunting rifle's projectile travels at about 3200ft per sec. A rail gun can propel a 1 ounce projectile at 20,000ft per sec.
That's enough to smash a tank (with no explosive material in projectile).
My design has no control of input current because there is none. It doesn't even have an on/off switch. It's started and stoped (by atrophy, no brake) by one of the simplest and oldest mechanical functions in existence.
Wayne wrote: The "pinching" of electrons though was a beauty!!!!
I take it you failed the colour perception/blindness test at high school? ... so never got to be an electrician.
If you understood the basic principles of electrical current (a flow of electrons) you'd know that stealing electrons from magnets in turbines and running them through a circuit before being allowed back home (the magnet) or earthed has been standard practice in electricity generation for eons.
If the electrons are earthed, the magnet draws in new electrons from the air (charged particles from the sun and cosmic radiation) to get back to normal/equilibrium.
Wayne wrote: RMIT had a good chuckle about that one!
Bullshit!
They'd tell you the same thing I just did.
The truth comes out alright .. you haven't got a clue what you're banging on about, and so lie about, and misrepresent others (RMIT).
Clearly you can't even comprehend Laithwaite's designs, let alone mine.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?