Sciences, Environmental/Climate issues, Academia and Technical interests
-
sprintcyclist
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Post
by sprintcyclist » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:02 am
Bogan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:39 am
NDP wrote
No response eh?
Well, I am pink... which I consider the most superior of shades. People with olive complexions are inferior to pink because they have been touched by darkies, at some stage in their genetic history. But not the pinkies.
I don't normally respond to sneery one liners, who's real intent is to disrupt the debate by heckling and tossing red herrings.
I think that we have established that you think races are equal. Now write at least 300 words justifying your position, or go and heckle and sneer somewhere else.
300+ words. A fair request.
I will ponder it and when I get the time, will see what I can do.
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
-
brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Post
by brian ross » Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:10 pm
Bogan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:50 am
Brian Ross wrote
Unwilling to accept a quote, hey? How primitive of you. How illiterate of you. Tsk, tsk. I always provide links to the EVIDENCE that supports my argument, Bogan. Just as you should. You'll never win an argument otherwise
I am doing very well at the moment. So well in fact that all you and NDP can do is heckle, sneer, and prevaricate to disrupt the debate.
Brian Ross wrote
If you can provide evidence, be it in links or in quoted text with links, to support your argument that is perfectly fine and in fact it is better than just making a statement with out supporting evidence, which is what Bogan insists is the only sort of argument that he accepts. Tsk, tsk. Who is he to dictate how his opponents can argue
Another red herring. There is nothing wrong with providing links or cut and paste's to support an argument, but I will not accept a cut and paste AS my opponents argument. For the reasons I have already given. Could we get back on topic now? Or do you still intend to prevaricate so that you can continue your disruption tactics?
You're just proving your illiteracy. I proved that Nom had in her quote the very thing you claimed she did not. Tsk, tsk. What year of school did you finish? Year 10? Suppose Eleccies just need to know difference between red and green wires.
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
-
Bogan
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:27 pm
Post
by Bogan » Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:56 pm
The topic under discussion is "Are races equal?" If you think that races are equal, then write at least 300 words explaining why you think your position is correct. If you can't, or won't do that, then piss off and try out your debate disrupting techniques elsewhere.
-
brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Post
by brian ross » Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:02 pm
Bogan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:56 pm
The topic under discussion is "Are races equal?" If you think that races are equal, then write at least 300 words explaining why you think your position is correct. If you can't, or won't do that, then piss off and try out your debate disrupting techniques elsewhere.
I have already made my
point, Bogan. It appears you missed it. Tough, I will not be bothering to repeat myself. "Race" is a social construct, not a scientific one.
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
-
Bogan
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:27 pm
Post
by Bogan » Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:50 pm
The topic under discussion is "Are races equal?" If you think that races are equal, then write at least 300 words explaining why you think your position is correct. If you can't, or won't do that, then piss off and try out your debate disrupting techniques elsewhere
-
brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Post
by brian ross » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:03 pm
I have already made my
point, Bogan. It appears you missed it. Tough, I will not be bothering to repeat myself. "Race" is a social construct, not a scientific one.
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
-
Bogan
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:27 pm
Post
by Bogan » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:08 pm
The topic under discussion is "Are races equal?" If you think that races are equal, then write at least 300 words explaining why you think your position is correct. If you can't, or won't do that, then piss off and try out your debate disrupting techniques elsewhere
-
brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Post
by brian ross » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:39 pm
I have already made my
point, Bogan. It appears you missed it. Tough, I will not be bothering to repeat myself. "Race" is a social construct, not a scientific one.
What is hard for you to understand about that statement, Bogan?
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
-
Bogan
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:27 pm
Post
by Bogan » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:43 am
Congratulations, Brian. You are succeeding in stifling the debate that you do not want examined.
-
brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Post
by brian ross » Thu Sep 12, 2019 11:54 am
Bogan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:43 am
Congratulations, Brian. You are succeeding in stifling the debate that you do not want examined.
Am I? Really? Where have I prevented any other poster from posting, Bogan? Where have I prevented YOU from posting? What I have done is made a statement. I am sticking by that statement, despite your continual taunting. Address that statement. That is if you're able to.
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests