Position of Moderator
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
Re: Position of Moderator
I thought you must have said more than that she was a sock to upset Monk that much. I don't recall exactly what you said.
Re: Position of Moderator
Mantra dropped some crap about Annie. I told her it was incorrect. She then drops some more lies about Annie and she got both barrels. Now mantra thinks she was hard done by!
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Position of Moderator
I posted that I didn't trust Aussie as administrator because of the last debacle when he had the job and the major changes to the format of this board that took place initially - or words to that affect. I also said that my account, computer & posts had been hacked/changed after visiting Monk's site. This happened more than once and I told Monk & AG about it. Monk or Aussie made some comment and I responded that he should look for the common denominator. This is what set Monk off in an insane and relentless rage.Rainbow Moonlight wrote:I thought you must have said more than that she was a sock to upset Monk that much. I don't recall exactly what you said.
Re: Position of Moderator
skippy wrote:Who did they ban???????????????????????????Jovial Monk wrote:Banning is a blunt weapon, last resort. Warnings, short suspensions, longer suspensions etc should mean bannings would be pretty rare. boxy and AiA banned 1 member in 12 months which is about as rarely as it should be needed.
Both Bizarro Monk and Jovial Monk Forum registered at forumwars and stated they had been banned by the former team.
Re: Position of Moderator
mantra, you have offered as many reasons as I have had showers for your lack of trust, but none of them have any factual basis, and all of them have to do with female feline cat domination fights.I posted that I didn't trust Aussie as administrator because of the last debacle when he had the job and the major changes to the format of this board that took place initially - or words to that affect.
How many times do you have to be told that those alleged 'major changes' were all of my doing, and no-one else's?
Really......I said some comment, did I?I also said that my account, computer & posts had been hacked/changed after visiting Monk's site. This happened more than once and I told Monk & AG about it. Monk or Aussie made some comment and I responded that he should look for the common denominator. This is what set Monk off in an insane and relentless rage.

Is that just like you reckon AiA told you via PM that the Polls closed on Tuesday?
Mantra, you are having a very bad week.
Give this stuff away, and just post like you used to..............relevant, concise, polite and on topic.

- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Position of Moderator
Aussie wrote:Really......I said some comment, did I?I also said that my account, computer & posts had been hacked/changed after visiting Monk's site. This happened more than once and I told Monk & AG about it. Monk or Aussie made some comment and I responded that he should look for the common denominator. This is what set Monk off in an insane and relentless rage.
Aussie - if I could find the posts which instigated Monk's fits of apoplexy in this maze of threads I would have quoted them. I said "Monk or Aussie" - and it is quoted above because I couldn't remember which one of you questioned me - and you know that. You are being pedantic and you're not a good detective although you like to think you are.
You cannot dictate to me the way you would like me to post. When you do - it immediately sends out warning signals that a "dictator" is controlling this board. Let me know when I start breaking the rules.Is that just like you reckon AiA told you via PM that the Polls closed on Tuesday?
Mantra, you are having a very bad week.
Give this stuff away, and just post like you used to..............relevant, concise, polite and on topic.
In regard to the AiA incident - if I knew which thread it was in I would have quoted my response to AiA, which he posted as evidence for you. Find AiA's disclosure of my message which says something to the affect of "Thank God voting closes today - I thought it was Thursday". It was a reply. I either misread his post, in which he should have corrected me - or he made an error, but like me - he probably wasn't paying much attention to the content.
Re: Position of Moderator
Monkey see monkey do, seems applicable here.Jovial Monk wrote:Wow, I use the table of one thing ONCE and IQ accuses me of being as unintelligent as him?

Re: Position of Moderator
Sheesh..............mantra..............all I can say is.....???????mantra wrote:Aussie wrote:Really......I said some comment, did I?I also said that my account, computer & posts had been hacked/changed after visiting Monk's site. This happened more than once and I told Monk & AG about it. Monk or Aussie made some comment and I responded that he should look for the common denominator. This is what set Monk off in an insane and relentless rage.
Aussie - if I could find the posts which instigated Monk's fits of apoplexy in this maze of threads I would have quoted them. I said "Monk or Aussie" - and it is quoted above because I couldn't remember which one of you questioned me - and you know that. You are being pedantic and you're not a good detective although you like to think you are.
Is that just like you reckon AiA told you via PM that the Polls closed on Tuesday?
Mantra, you are having a very bad week.
Give this stuff away, and just post like you used to..............relevant, concise, polite and on topic.
You cannot dictate to me the way you would like me to post. When you do - it immediately sends out warning signals that a "dictator" is controlling this board. Let me know when I start breaking the rules.
In regard to the AiA incident - if I knew which thread it was in I would have quoted my response to AiA, which he posted as evidence for you. Find AiA's disclosure of my message which says something to the affect of "Thank God voting closes today - I thought it was Thursday". It was a reply. I either misread his post, in which he should have corrected me - or he made an error, but like me - he probably wasn't paying much attention to the content.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest