Seems logical. If monk isn't made a mod, then he was the liar... if he is appointed, it's Aussie that liedIQS.RLOW wrote:If Monk is the liar, then he can't be put in a position of trust. If Aussie is the liar then this thread is completely useless as he has already promised it to Monk
So is Monk or Aussie the liar. This should be of interest to everybody before anyone moves forward with moderator ideas
Position of Moderator
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: Position of Moderator
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Position of Moderator
I am putting my trust and faith in what I myself have seen posted on here for ALL to see by both Monk and Aussie prior to the election result.lisa jones wrote:Also IQ, Monk made some recommendations for change re Modding which Aussie stated he would take on board in his platform because the changes would encourage and engender reform such as fairness and inclusivity.
That is all I am aware of.
Hence WHY I have out forward something which meets all these "requirements" for want of a better word.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
-
Lisa
Re: Position of Moderator
boxy wrote:Seems logical. If monk isn't made a mod, then he was the liar... if he is appointed, it's Aussie that liedIQS.RLOW wrote:If Monk is the liar, then he can't be put in a position of trust. If Aussie is the liar then this thread is completely useless as he has already promised it to Monk
So is Monk or Aussie the liar. This should be of interest to everybody before anyone moves forward with moderator ideas
i think youve forced the appointers hand
-
Jovial Monk
Re: Position of Moderator
Another PM:
Some irrelevant crap removed from that PM.I know. But voting for IQ is the only way to force change.
In the meantime, talk about proposes changes like that so that not only do you and boxy not serve more than two terms you don’t just get boxy-aussie-boxy.
Promise to appoint a newby as mod. Auzgurl say. I cannot stand as candidate because then everyone will say I did this for myself like I am sure that is why you are PMing me
Last edited by Jovial Monk on Sun Apr 03, 2011 9:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Position of Moderator
In any event .. this topic itself is evidence enough that Aussie is adhering to his policy platform and asking for people to come forward for consideration for the Mod position.lisa jones wrote:I am putting my trust and faith in what I myself have seen posted on here for ALL to see by both Monk and Aussie prior to the election result.lisa jones wrote:Also IQ, Monk made some recommendations for change re Modding which Aussie stated he would take on board in his platform because the changes would encourage and engender reform such as fairness and inclusivity.
That is all I am aware of.
Hence WHY I have out forward something which meets all these "requirements" for want of a better word.
And now Monk and Skippy and IQ have been put forward along with Outlaw Yogi. I have counted 4 posters thus far who are standing for this position.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
-
Lisa
Re: Position of Moderator
Jovial Monk wrote:Another PM:Some irrelevant crap removed from that PM.I know. But voting for IQ is the only way to force change.
In the meantime, talk about proposes changes like that so that not only do you and boxy not serve more than two terms you don’t just get boxy-aussie-boxy.
Promise to appoint a newby as mod. Auzgurl say. I cannot stand as candidate because then everyone will say I did this for myself like I am sure that is why you are PMing me
and who sent the pm?
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Position of Moderator
And Aussie has confirmed what I have just said!Aussie wrote:boxy wrote:I heard you were already promised the jobJovial Monk wrote:Are wannabe trolls eligible?
I am sure you have. Monk posted at his site that I promised him the Mod Job. That was, to be polite, as I was, very '"careless"" of him, and I told him so in open, and repeated what I had promised in the election campaign in open and also via PM to Monk during that campaign. Mantra saw what he said and has repeated it elsewhere. It suited her agenda.
Fact is.....noone has a rail's run.....noone has been promised anything.
I will hear what Members want, and I will act according to concensus. That is what I promised, in conjunction with a declared personal preference that the PA Original stranglehold be broken, and a Newby get the Mod Job.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
-
Lisa
Re: Position of Moderator
Jovial Monk wrote:Fuck me but you are thick, “Lisa.”
you wish
anyone can post a supposed pm but you dont put any author to it
try selling some other crap
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Position of Moderator
Which thus brings us to this ^^^lisa jones wrote:Ok, here goes ..lisa jones wrote:I've been thinking about this idea for a few days now ..
I don't believe it's ever been tried before on PA.
And I think it falls in line with Aussie's Policy Platform and direction to reform this forum and make it fairer and more inclusive.
It would be awesome if those who have been nominated or put forward for Mod and who would like to offer their time to do so were given the opportunity to TRY the role for 3 months within the context of THIS forum.
I believe this will benefit:
* the individual who takes on the role of Mod because it will encourage more forum posters to come forward and give it a go. As the commitment isn't for a whole year, it will allow for different people ( males/females/newbies/oldies/lefties/righties) to try their hand at the role and provide each individual with forum Mod training and experience.
* the Forum as a whole because we will be able to sample the different modes of modding .. given that each individual will bring their personality and past experiences into the role.
I believe that this structure provides for a win-win outcome.
Those Mods who are elected by Admin to cover the 3 month terms should be announced at the beginning of a new Admin's tenure ( in effect creating a time table to cover the 12 months ahead ).
So .. in essence .. we have 4 people who are being considered for Mod atm.
And the proposed changes I am suggesting would nicely allow for all 4 members to mod the forum over the course of the next 12 months.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests