Constitution

This folder contains Archived threads.
Post Reply
Jovial Monk

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Jovial Monk » Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:19 pm

All you idiots who sign up realise that you can no longer say that you didn't sign on to the crappy constitution and that is probably the only reason the vote is on! When you recall the low, dirty tactics FD used to get rid of Aussie (and where is MM/Sappho now? Kiwi_Dave? Hmmm??) you will understand there is no low trick to which FD will not stoop.

So think very carefully before you vote for the meaningless change to the meaningless constitution! Your vote is for a different, more nefarious purpose than passing a meaningless change to FD's constitution: it is to shut you up about claiming you never signed up to it!

Maxine

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Maxine » Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:28 pm

Thank you Mr Monk!

I vote NO too! Away with dirty tricks!

Ned Kelly

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:54 pm

PA never ever accepted the first version offered by freeloader. I vote "No,' to both versions.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by freediver » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:05 pm

you will understand there is no low trick to which FD will not stoop
Like spreading lies about forum security to make people think you know what you are talking about?
I vote "No,' to both versions.
Unfortunately you can't vote no to the current one. You have to replace it with an alternative. If you would prefer no constitution, I would be happy to make it up as I go along.

Ned Kelly

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:15 pm

Boxy wrote:
Please vote within the next 6 days, yes or no, to the following changes to PA's constitution, that freediver has suggested after consultation.
Freeloader wrote:

If you would prefer no constitution, I would be happy to make it up as I go along.
Which is exactly what he has always been doing, because he has PA by the jugular, as Host, and he is squeezing the beejezus out of it.

Boxy, how does it feel having his fist up your arse?

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by freediver » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:19 pm

because he has PA by the jugular, as Host, and he is squeezing the beejezus out of it
Would you prefer I put Aussie in charge?

Ned Kelly

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:22 pm

How, exactly, do you manage to 'put" anyone "in charge?" Oh yeah, forgot, that's right. You own this Site.

Boxy, how does it feel having freeloader's fist up your arse?

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by boxy » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:49 pm

He hasn't touched my arse, thanks for the concern. Arsie. I prefer it here though, rather than having either your hairy ham, or that of deepy or the mad monk, doing the fisting. Seems like most others do too :roll:

BTW, I thought you weren't going to vote?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Ned Kelly

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:30 pm

Well, Boxy, you are the exalted one. How does the voting work? Is it a yes/no thing as you said, or is it a ........ take what freeloader has on offer, or come up with your own?

Remember, Boxy, you are there as duly elected Secretary of freeloader to serve the Members. So, serve. Explain this dichotomy, and soon, wot. Your deadline approaches.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitution Update - Vote

Post by freediver » Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:48 pm

Is Ned Aussie?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests