Vaccines - historically

All things Health (including Viruses like Covid)
Post Reply
User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25694
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Feb 13, 2021 7:54 pm

Tex has antibodies after 6 months and will do better than those who have the vax. I'll take my chances.
Top
User avatar
Nom De Plume
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by Nom De Plume » Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:38 pm

Do we know yet when a 'vaccine, is not a vaccine'?

:rofl :rofl :rofl
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Top
User avatar
billy the kid
Posts: 5814
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by billy the kid » Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:47 pm

Nom De Plume wrote: ↑
Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:38 pm
 Do we know yet when a 'vaccine, is not a vaccine'?

:rofl :rofl :rofl
Well..dont refer to Merriam Webster for a definition...
They changed the definition to suit Pfizer...
Big Pharma only received conditional approval to use their jabs because
they called it a vaccine....when in actual fact, everyone knew that it
was experimental gene therapy under trial til 2023....
In my other thread Dr Astrid Stuckelberger tips the bucket on the WHO, GAVI and everyone
else...
Its 42 minutes which is well worth listening to....
The WHO, GAVI and the rest of them...Bill Gates...all of them
are promoting the vaccines (sorry jabs)...
Follow the money... :hush
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...
Top
User avatar
Nom De Plume
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by Nom De Plume » Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:57 pm

billy the kid wrote: ↑
Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:47 pm
Nom De Plume wrote: ↑
Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:38 pm
 Do we know yet when a 'vaccine, is not a vaccine'?

:rofl :rofl :rofl
Well..dont refer to Merriam Webster for a definition...
They changed the definition to suit Pfizer...
Big Pharma only received conditional approval to use their jabs because
they called it a vaccine....when in actual fact, everyone knew that it
was experimental gene therapy under trial til 2023....
In my other thread Dr Astrid Stuckelberger tips the bucket on the WHO, GAVI and everyone
else...
Its 42 minutes which is well worth listening to....
The WHO, GAVI and the rest of them...Bill Gates...all of them
are promoting the vaccines (sorry jabs)...
Follow the money... :hush
Bravo Billy... you go strait to the top of the class!

This is not a vaccine being offered to the plebs... It is gene therapy.
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Top
User avatar
Nom De Plume
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by Nom De Plume » Tue Jul 13, 2021 3:51 pm

If I opt for gene therapy, then Novavax is my preference. Less side effects and no changes to my blood cell structure as is the case with other mRNA genetic therapies

https://www.verywellhealth.com/novavax- ... ts-5192068
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Top
User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25694
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Jul 13, 2021 4:28 pm

We won't be getting Novavax here though although we are supposedly getting J&J sometime this year.
Top
Aussie

Re: Vaccines - historically

Post by Aussie » Tue Jul 13, 2021 4:49 pm

Black Orchid wrote: ↑
Sat Feb 13, 2021 7:54 pm
 Tex has antibodies after 6 months and will do better than those who have the vax. I'll take my chances.
Of course as you would know, given your relevant qualifications. Hang on......you do have relevant qualifications, yes?

:roll:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Medical & Health”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests