......came to light this evening on ACA with that media tart/frump Grimshaw interviewing Nick.
Nick had to draw her attention to the truth that 'agreed facts' were presented to the Presiding Magistrate when Nick was sentenced.
Grimshaw went out of her way to put something to Nick which Cowley himself had made no mention of during his ACA interview.......that is that the 'agreed facts' had not been agreed to by Cowley, but rather they had been agreed between Prosecutor and Defence Counsel.
The clear implication is that the Prosecutor agreed to a set of facts which Cowley did not agree with.
If that is the truth, then the NSW legal system needs to get to the bottom of it. If I am bashed and tell a Prosecutor that apples are apples, he is stepping way out of line, and into a perversion of justice territory if he goes into Court declaring apples are oranges.
I wonder if that issue will emerge in the Media, or in the judicial world?
A new aspect of the Nick D'Arcy story
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- JW Frogen
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am
Re: A new aspect of the Nick D'Arcy story
No your out of order, this whole court is out of order!!!!!"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bobby and 17 guests