Something from nothing?

[Jovial Monk]

Shakespeare said it couldn’t be done. But two Dutch physiscists begged to differ in 1948.

Quantum physics, turning notions on their heads for several decades.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... space.html?

[boxy]

Useless link, without registration.

[Jovial Monk]

So register, IQ

[annielaurie]

Here is another article about the same thing, from the New York Times,

There’s More to Nothing Than We Knew

By Dennis Overbye
Published: February 20, 2012

It is, perhaps, the mystery of last resort. Scientists may be at least theoretically able to trace every last galaxy back to a bump in the Big Bang, to complete the entire quantum roll call of particles and forces. But the question of why there was a Big Bang or any quantum particles at all was presumed to lie safely out of scientific bounds, in the realms of philosophy or religion.

Now even that assumption is no longer safe, as exemplified by a new book by the cosmologist Lawrence M. Krauss. In it he joins a chorus of physicists and cosmologists who have been pushing into sacred ground, proclaiming more and more loudly in the last few years that science can explain how something — namely our star-spangled cosmos — could be born from, if not nothing, something very close to it. God, they argue, is not part of the equation. The book, “A Universe From Nothing,” is a best seller and follows recent popular tomes like “God Is Not Great,” by the late Christopher Hitchens; “The God Delusion,” by Richard Dawkins; and “The Grand Design,” by the British cosmologist Stephen Hawking (with Leonard Mlodinow), which generated headlines two years ago with its assertion that physicists do not need God to account for the universe.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/scien ... ef=science