Hill billy capers
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25688
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Hill billy capers
Aussie is in contact with this scum behind the scenes?
Re: Hill billy capers
Outlaw Yogi, you are delusional. I do not know 'Custard Guts,' or anyone else you went out of your way to name before SN made those names vanish. He posted in public that he had done so. It was you who posted what you said was the real name of 'Custard Guts' here, and you added that he was/is the Member known as Nato (with a number added) here.
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
Apparently. They're both roughly the same age and both grew up in Bundy.Black Orchid wrote:Aussie is in contact with this scum behind the scenes?
When I posted a photo and real ID of Custard Guts with links to his memberships here, someone (either Custard Guts or Aussie) complained to FD, saying they know this person personally.
Now Aussie acts as the puppy poisoner's advocate.
You know how it is, scum is drawn to scum.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
Re: Hill billy capers
Indeed, you were buddy buddy with him at one stage were you not?Outlaw Yogi wrote:Apparently. They're both roughly the same age and both grew up in Bundy.Black Orchid wrote:Aussie is in contact with this scum behind the scenes?
When I posted a photo and real ID of Custard Guts with links to his memberships here, someone (either Custard Guts or Aussie) complained to FD, saying they know this person personally.
Now Aussie acts as the puppy poisoner's advocate.
You know how it is, [youtube]scum is drawn to scum[/youtube].
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
He's a neighbour Mugsly!Aussie wrote:Indeed, you were buddy buddy with him at one stage were you not?Outlaw Yogi wrote:Apparently. They're both roughly the same age and both grew up in Bundy.Black Orchid wrote:Aussie is in contact with this scum behind the scenes?
When I posted a photo and real ID of Custard Guts with links to his memberships here, someone (either Custard Guts or Aussie) complained to FD, saying they know this person personally.
Now Aussie acts as the puppy poisoner's advocate.
You know how it is, [youtube]scum is drawn to scum[/youtube].
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
The epic piss take:You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
I often collect fire wood in a state forest and sometimes I save the log butts for seats or car stands ect.
Loggers are currently cutting in the forest I'm collecting from so there's some nice new butts around.
Got some big Spotted Gum slabs recently that's make good table tops/benches, so I've been looking for butts big enough to use as table legs
and I found one, of Iron Bark.
The dramas I had obtaining this piece of wood ... First I dragged it out of the bush from the stump on to the
loggers track and to a tree with a fork in it with a snap strap. Then I couldn't get it high enough to back the tray under because I couldn't shorten the chain enough, so left it on top of a slightly smaller Spotted Gum butt.
Bought a D shackle to fit the chain, went back and was only a couple of inches shy of prising the low end onto the tray with a long tree branch up the hollow of the butt. So figured I'd try backing up from the opposite direction to get under the high end of the butt and then prise it on with the tree branch.
Well backing up I smashed my tail light and bent my rear guard on a branch off a log and stll wasn't angled right. So I backed and forthed between some
trees and got stuck on a log. 3 logs actually. Out comes the hydraulic jack. First attempt (raising body) failed. Second attempt (raising wheel) and
jamming chunks of wood under was a success, and I got mauled by ants. It got dark, so I left the butt hanging on the snap strap, winch and chain.
Spent all weekend sticking my tail light back together with silicone rubber and pieces of plastic bottles, and strung it up under the tray with tie wire.
Went back to get butt again, or at least retrieve my winch and chain. I already knew the butt wasn't high enough so decided to lower it back down onto
the other butt but the winch jammed. Fortunately it's jammed before, so I had drilled a hole in the side of it so I can push back the ratchet that
catches on the teeth. I lowered the butt 1, 2 or 3 teeth at a time, shotened the chain up, raised it again and backed the tray under it.
Now I have my table leg.
Loggers are currently cutting in the forest I'm collecting from so there's some nice new butts around.
Got some big Spotted Gum slabs recently that's make good table tops/benches, so I've been looking for butts big enough to use as table legs
and I found one, of Iron Bark.
The dramas I had obtaining this piece of wood ... First I dragged it out of the bush from the stump on to the
loggers track and to a tree with a fork in it with a snap strap. Then I couldn't get it high enough to back the tray under because I couldn't shorten the chain enough, so left it on top of a slightly smaller Spotted Gum butt.
Bought a D shackle to fit the chain, went back and was only a couple of inches shy of prising the low end onto the tray with a long tree branch up the hollow of the butt. So figured I'd try backing up from the opposite direction to get under the high end of the butt and then prise it on with the tree branch.
Well backing up I smashed my tail light and bent my rear guard on a branch off a log and stll wasn't angled right. So I backed and forthed between some
trees and got stuck on a log. 3 logs actually. Out comes the hydraulic jack. First attempt (raising body) failed. Second attempt (raising wheel) and
jamming chunks of wood under was a success, and I got mauled by ants. It got dark, so I left the butt hanging on the snap strap, winch and chain.
Spent all weekend sticking my tail light back together with silicone rubber and pieces of plastic bottles, and strung it up under the tray with tie wire.
Went back to get butt again, or at least retrieve my winch and chain. I already knew the butt wasn't high enough so decided to lower it back down onto
the other butt but the winch jammed. Fortunately it's jammed before, so I had drilled a hole in the side of it so I can push back the ratchet that
catches on the teeth. I lowered the butt 1, 2 or 3 teeth at a time, shotened the chain up, raised it again and backed the tray under it.
Now I have my table leg.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
Seems the spooks interfering with my online activity are spooked by what I've written in Bobby's 'New Ice Age' thread, because no matter how many times I try and no matter what connection I use, I'm not allowed to post in it anymore.
So I'm not allowed to comment in Muslim related threads and now Global Warming threads.
Wonder what their problem is?
This is what I intended posting;
unable to explain why some parts of the planet are warming and others cooling, but the over all trend is warming.
As has been the case to varying degrees for the last 18,000 years.
The energy industry hired some scientists to debunk Global Warming.
Their scientists came back and said "We can't, it's real"
So the petroleum industry changed tact and decided to cash in on the Green theme (eg BP).
But the coal industry (eg Peabody Coal) wouldn't accept the situation so got some PR spin doctors to coin a less
threatening name for Global warming, and the result was "Climate Change".
Which coincedence or not is actually a very accurate description, because the climate does change, considerably.
For example Antarctica has dead forests under miles of ice, the Sahara desert used to be a forest, just off the
coast of many long inhabited countries are submerged ancient structures (India, Japan, Egypt ect) and the Sphinx's
body has water erosion while the head only has wind erosion.
The obvious conclusion is as the axis shifts, land moves into different climatic zones and has a new weather pattern.
So I'm not allowed to comment in Muslim related threads and now Global Warming threads.
Wonder what their problem is?
This is what I intended posting;
Not really, the so called experts forgot to or are ignorant of Axial Precession/Precession of the Equinoxes, thusLucas wrote:Impressive, first they went on a GLOBAL WARMING binge then mother nature made fun of them.
unable to explain why some parts of the planet are warming and others cooling, but the over all trend is warming.
As has been the case to varying degrees for the last 18,000 years.
Actually it was the meteorologists who said "Global warming" but blamed CO2 for it.Lucas wrote:Then they said CLIMATE CHANGES and everyone else said "State the bleeding Obvious".
The energy industry hired some scientists to debunk Global Warming.
Their scientists came back and said "We can't, it's real"
So the petroleum industry changed tact and decided to cash in on the Green theme (eg BP).
But the coal industry (eg Peabody Coal) wouldn't accept the situation so got some PR spin doctors to coin a less
threatening name for Global warming, and the result was "Climate Change".
Which coincedence or not is actually a very accurate description, because the climate does change, considerably.
For example Antarctica has dead forests under miles of ice, the Sahara desert used to be a forest, just off the
coast of many long inhabited countries are submerged ancient structures (India, Japan, Egypt ect) and the Sphinx's
body has water erosion while the head only has wind erosion.
The obvious conclusion is as the axis shifts, land moves into different climatic zones and has a new weather pattern.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
-
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:11 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
Actually that's bullshit. The warming happening isn't even worth reporting on and the so called scientists that couldn't disprove it is bullshit. The models used by the alarmist have been proven wrong and everyone knows the bloody climate always changes.Outlaw Yogi wrote:Seems the spooks interfering with my online activity are spooked by what I've written in Bobby's 'New Ice Age' thread, because no matter how many times I try and no matter what connection I use, I'm not allowed to post in it anymore.
So I'm not allowed to comment in Muslim related threads and now Global Warming threads.
Wonder what their problem is?
This is what I intended posting;
Not really, the so called experts forgot to or are ignorant of Axial Precession/Precession of the Equinoxes, thusLucas wrote:Impressive, first they went on a GLOBAL WARMING binge then mother nature made fun of them.
unable to explain why some parts of the planet are warming and others cooling, but the over all trend is warming.
As has been the case to varying degrees for the last 18,000 years.
Actually it was the meteorologists who said "Global warming" but blamed CO2 for it.Lucas wrote:Then they said CLIMATE CHANGES and everyone else said "State the bleeding Obvious".
The energy industry hired some scientists to debunk Global Warming.
Their scientists came back and said "We can't, it's real"
So the petroleum industry changed tact and decided to cash in on the Green theme (eg BP).
But the coal industry (eg Peabody Coal) wouldn't accept the situation so got some PR spin doctors to coin a less
threatening name for Global warming, and the result was "Climate Change".
Which coincedence or not is actually a very accurate description, because the climate does change, considerably.
For example Antarctica has dead forests under miles of ice, the Sahara desert used to be a forest, just off the
coast of many long inhabited countries are submerged ancient structures (India, Japan, Egypt ect) and the Sphinx's
body has water erosion while the head only has wind erosion.
The obvious conclusion is as the axis shifts, land moves into different climatic zones and has a new weather pattern.
Can't wait for the next installment of the pending ice age.
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Hill billy capers
You might think it's BS, but the thermometers disagree with you.
The models are just computer programs, and a machine can only work with the info provided.
When said info is incomplete, ie axis shift (thus why one side of a continent called Antarctica is thawing out as the other side gets colder, and why Northern Canada is thawing out as Russia gets colder) is stands to reason the predictions will be out of whack.
The (isolated) "Ice Age" Bobby's material refers to is a prediction made by the Pentagon to George Dubya Bush back in 2004, stating that global warming has the potential to shut down the Gulf Stream (regarded as the pump of Earth's ocean currents)due to reduced ocean salinity from flood waters.
The theory goes that Western Europe is only temperate due to warm Atlantic currents from the tropics, heads West to Africa, sinks due to salt load and cools as it moves down East Africa. As the salinity is reduced from increased melt water the "pump" aka 'Great Ocean Conveyor' slows or stops. And without the warmth of those tropical currents Western Europe will experience weather similar to Siberia.
Since that initial prediction (in 2004) the Gulf Stream has reputedly slowed by 20% and some say 30%. How true or false that is I do not know.
Anyway, my point is global warming is reality, and has been for 18,000 years now.
It's all the scaremongering to cash in on an "impending disaster" that's bullshit.
And cashing in on it includes taxes on imaginary causes.
I've been through shiploads of research and even approached the topic from tangents with factors nobody else seems to consider, and what I've worked out is > GW/CC is natural, not man made, is cyclic, not an unknown phenomena.
CO2 has very little bearing on GW itself, but what no one seems to be asking is what are the electrical properties of CO2?
Different forms of carbon have varying electrical properties, from conductor, inert, to resister.
So what I'd like to know is how varying CO2 levels react to increased volumes of charged particles (mostly electrons and protons) from soar winds/sun spot activity and increased levels of cosmic radiation from the centre of the Milky Way? as our solar system passes closer to the centre of the Milky Way which it does just shy of every 13,000 years.
One of the things solar wind/sun spot activity (storms on the surface of our sun that blast plasma 4,000 miles out in to space) is reduce the power of Earth's magnetosphere, and the magnetosphere is the biggest factor concerning axis alignment.
Now the fact Earth's axis shift/drift rate roughly doubled about 20 years ago suggests the increased cosmic radiation levels from the centre of the Milky Way on out solar system's 25,98 year elliptic orbit around the galaxy is charging our sun up. And as the sun charges up it takes power from our magnetosphere.
This is all natural and way beyond man's means to tamper with, but I'd like to know if CO2 acts as a conductor, battery, resistor or has no impact?
Now as for GHGs part in GW, I don't believe CO2 is the culprit, nor CH4 (which admitedly does have the potential to cause "Runaway Global warming" ... eg the Permian Extiction). I believe the GHG having the greatest bearing but not actually causing GW is NO2 from fertilisers. But you can't tax it because NO2 is emitted every time it rains, so who does the tax man charge the tax to? and at what rate? and do they get a rebate for drought?
Quite simply the planet is over populated and the excess NO2 is because we're trying to feed 7.5 billion people on a planet that can only sustainably support 3 billion. So nature's going to cull us.
The models are just computer programs, and a machine can only work with the info provided.
When said info is incomplete, ie axis shift (thus why one side of a continent called Antarctica is thawing out as the other side gets colder, and why Northern Canada is thawing out as Russia gets colder) is stands to reason the predictions will be out of whack.
The (isolated) "Ice Age" Bobby's material refers to is a prediction made by the Pentagon to George Dubya Bush back in 2004, stating that global warming has the potential to shut down the Gulf Stream (regarded as the pump of Earth's ocean currents)due to reduced ocean salinity from flood waters.
The theory goes that Western Europe is only temperate due to warm Atlantic currents from the tropics, heads West to Africa, sinks due to salt load and cools as it moves down East Africa. As the salinity is reduced from increased melt water the "pump" aka 'Great Ocean Conveyor' slows or stops. And without the warmth of those tropical currents Western Europe will experience weather similar to Siberia.
Since that initial prediction (in 2004) the Gulf Stream has reputedly slowed by 20% and some say 30%. How true or false that is I do not know.
Anyway, my point is global warming is reality, and has been for 18,000 years now.
It's all the scaremongering to cash in on an "impending disaster" that's bullshit.
And cashing in on it includes taxes on imaginary causes.
I've been through shiploads of research and even approached the topic from tangents with factors nobody else seems to consider, and what I've worked out is > GW/CC is natural, not man made, is cyclic, not an unknown phenomena.
CO2 has very little bearing on GW itself, but what no one seems to be asking is what are the electrical properties of CO2?
Different forms of carbon have varying electrical properties, from conductor, inert, to resister.
So what I'd like to know is how varying CO2 levels react to increased volumes of charged particles (mostly electrons and protons) from soar winds/sun spot activity and increased levels of cosmic radiation from the centre of the Milky Way? as our solar system passes closer to the centre of the Milky Way which it does just shy of every 13,000 years.
One of the things solar wind/sun spot activity (storms on the surface of our sun that blast plasma 4,000 miles out in to space) is reduce the power of Earth's magnetosphere, and the magnetosphere is the biggest factor concerning axis alignment.
Now the fact Earth's axis shift/drift rate roughly doubled about 20 years ago suggests the increased cosmic radiation levels from the centre of the Milky Way on out solar system's 25,98 year elliptic orbit around the galaxy is charging our sun up. And as the sun charges up it takes power from our magnetosphere.
This is all natural and way beyond man's means to tamper with, but I'd like to know if CO2 acts as a conductor, battery, resistor or has no impact?
Now as for GHGs part in GW, I don't believe CO2 is the culprit, nor CH4 (which admitedly does have the potential to cause "Runaway Global warming" ... eg the Permian Extiction). I believe the GHG having the greatest bearing but not actually causing GW is NO2 from fertilisers. But you can't tax it because NO2 is emitted every time it rains, so who does the tax man charge the tax to? and at what rate? and do they get a rebate for drought?
Quite simply the planet is over populated and the excess NO2 is because we're trying to feed 7.5 billion people on a planet that can only sustainably support 3 billion. So nature's going to cull us.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests