Cardinal Pell

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:28 pm

Pell's appeal goes before the High Court tomorrow.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:00 pm

Cardinal Pell freed from prison after High Court quashes child sex abuse convictions in a unanimous decision!
Cardinal George Pell says a "serious injustice" has been remedied as he is freed from prison after the country's highest court quashed his child sexual abuse convictions.

The unanimous decision has been handed down less than a month after the High Court of Australia heard two days of intense legal arguments from the Cardinal's lawyers and Victorian prosecutors.

Shortly before 12:30pm, Cardinal Pell was freed from Barwon Prison, leaving in a convoy of cars headed by a white Mercedes.

It is not known where he will be taken or where he intends to stay.

The full bench's ruling was handed down by Chief Justice Susan Kiefel in an almost empty High Court registry in Brisbane, due to physical-distancing measures introduced in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The public gallery, which can seat up to 16 people, only contained three journalists to hear Chief Justice Kiefel deliver the ruling at 10:00am.
Today the High Court handed down its decision, granting Cardinal Pell's application for special leave and unanimously acquitting him.

In its summary, the High Court stated the Victorian Court of Appeal judges "failed to engage with the question of whether there remained a reasonable possibility that the offending had not taken place".

The court found that other witnesses' evidence was "inconsistent with the complainant's account" and described how George Pell, then the archbishop of Melbourne, would greet parishioners on the cathedral steps, for up to 15 minutes after mass.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-07/ ... s/12048726

User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6275
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Redneck » Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:32 pm

Having watched that Victorian appeal live on TV, I was very impressed with Weinberg (the disenting judge) so it is interesting that the High Court found 7 to zip the same as Weinberg.

I thought from recollection Weinberg seemed to ask more delving questions during that appeal and seemed more switched on.

“Weinberg is regarded as one of the great authorities on criminal law in this country. He’s spoken of as a man who ought by right to have sat on the High Court. His questioning during the appeal (by Pell) in June was particularly lucid.”

https://thesydneyinstitute.com.au/blog/ ... g-dissent/

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:41 pm

I was impressed with Weinberg as well. I didn't like Anne Ferguson at all and Chris Maxwell seemed wishy washy.

Personally, I think this is a good and just outcome. There is no doubt the Catholic church has a lot to account for but punishing one man on dodgy evidence is not the way to gain retribution. I consider Pell was used as a scapegoat and that's not the way things should be done.

User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6275
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Redneck » Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:22 pm

Not sure if this is true but I heard mentioned on radio today.

There is some suggestion that maybe the trial judge didnt direct the jury correctly to make sure they considered any reasonable doubt raised by the other witnesses testimonies

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:44 pm

There was plenty of reasonable doubt in the initial trials so nothing would surprise me.

Surely Pell's Counsel should have picked that up though? Having said that, his initial QC was really not that good in my opinion.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:07 pm

Definitely a scapegoat. Listening to the whingers on the news apparently hundreds of victims are outraged and are going to start a class action. Against Pell? Give me a break.

Take on the perpetrators for sure but don't use one man to vent your anger.

405 days in jail and the statistics were very much against this outcome.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18293
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Bobby » Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:30 pm

Can Pell now sue for damages including the $1 million
legal bills and false imprisonment for 405 days?

User avatar
billy the kid
Posts: 5814
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by billy the kid » Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:35 pm

Was this the same High Court that said that we shouldn't/couldn't/cant deport indigenous Australians...
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18293
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Cardinal Pell

Post by Bobby » Wed Apr 08, 2020 6:28 am

Pell would have enjoyed his freedom last night:

I bet those nuns put on a nice roast dinner tonight for Pell
and he washed it down with a few glasses of red wine.

Also - he survived in a jail for over a year where
the prisoners bash up kiddy fiddlers -
he did well.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests