Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

mellie · Post by **mellie** » Thu May 03, 2018 2:58 pm

How so, Malc,?

Please Explain.

mellie · Post by **mellie** » Thu May 03, 2018 3:00 pm

Malcolm_hates_your_kids wrote:
mellie wrote:Exactly Cods.

About time someone stood up.

Apparently no means yes, to some.
You seem a little biased...

I sincerely think you have me confused for something else Malc.

You right hand?

BigP · Post by **BigP** » Thu May 03, 2018 4:02 pm

mellie wrote:
Malcolm_hates_your_kids wrote:
mellie wrote:Exactly Cods.

About time someone stood up.

Apparently no means yes, to some.
You seem a little biased...

I sincerely think you have me confused for something else Malc.

You right hand?

You dont wanna be cunfused for his right hand. thats the one he fondles his nut sack with lol

mellie · Post by **mellie** » Thu May 03, 2018 4:15 pm

Ieeew. Damn right.

Malcolm_hates_your_kids · Post by **Malcolm_hates_your_kids** » Thu May 03, 2018 5:22 pm

The Mechanic · Post by **The Mechanic** » Thu May 03, 2018 7:07 pm

Black Orchid wrote:Mechanic you really do not believe we have been to the moon?

You know it would cost more to try to fake it?

not so...

we can't get through the van Allan belts..

NASA admit this...

other Astronauts admit we can't go passed lower Earths Orbit...

they have just sent probes through the Van Allan belts to learn more about them so that we can build a space ship good enough to go through them without killing the astronauts...

they found an Extra Belt that they didn't even know about...

so if we can't get through the Van Allan Radiation belt now... what makes you think they did back in 69 (49 years ago) in not much more than a tin can??

BigP · Post by **BigP** » Thu May 03, 2018 7:10 pm

The Mechanic wrote:
Black Orchid wrote:Mechanic you really do not believe we have been to the moon?

You know it would cost more to try to fake it?

not so...

we can't get through the van Allan belts..

NASA admit this...

other Astronauts admit we can't go passed lower Earths Orbit...

they have just sent probes through the Van Allan belts to learn more about them so that we can build a space ship good enough to go through them without killing the astronauts...

they found an Extra Belt that they didn't even know about...

so if we can't get through the Van Allan Radiation belt now... what makes you think they did back in 69 (49 years ago) in not much more than a tin can??

Yep and the earths flat, lol

You need to get out more buddy

The Mechanic · Post by **The Mechanic** » Thu May 03, 2018 7:16 pm

BigP wrote:
The Mechanic wrote:
Black Orchid wrote:Mechanic you really do not believe we have been to the moon?

You know it would cost more to try to fake it?

not so...

we can't get through the van Allan belts..

NASA admit this...

other Astronauts admit we can't go passed lower Earths Orbit...

they have just sent probes through the Van Allan belts to learn more about them so that we can build a space ship good enough to go through them without killing the astronauts...

they found an Extra Belt that they didn't even know about...

so if we can't get through the Van Allan Radiation belt now... what makes you think they did back in 69 (49 years ago) in not much more than a tin can??
Yep and the earths flat, lol

You need to get out more buddy

and you need to THINK for yourself instead of being told what to think...

I suppose you believe in Global Warming and that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction??

BigP · Post by **BigP** » Thu May 03, 2018 7:25 pm

The Mechanic wrote:
BigP wrote:
The Mechanic wrote:
Black Orchid wrote:Mechanic you really do not believe we have been to the moon?

You know it would cost more to try to fake it?

not so...

we can't get through the van Allan belts..

NASA admit this...

other Astronauts admit we can't go passed lower Earths Orbit...

they have just sent probes through the Van Allan belts to learn more about them so that we can build a space ship good enough to go through them without killing the astronauts...

they found an Extra Belt that they didn't even know about...

so if we can't get through the Van Allan Radiation belt now... what makes you think they did back in 69 (49 years ago) in not much more than a tin can??
Yep and the earths flat, lol

You need to get out more buddy
and you need to THINK for yourself instead of being told what to think...

I suppose you believe in Global Warming and that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction??

The planet has been warming up since the last ice age, You probably think the US government flew the planes into the world trade centre lol

The Mechanic · Post by **The Mechanic** » Thu May 03, 2018 7:36 pm

Stanley Kubrick (1928–1999)

1999 Eyes Wide Shut

1987 Full Metal Jacket

1980 The Shining

1975 Barry Lyndon

1971 A Clockwork Orange

1968 2001: A Space Odyssey

1964 Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

1962 Stanley Kubrick's Lolita

1960 Spartacus

1957 Paths of Glory

1956 The Killing

1955 Killer's Kiss

1953 The Seafarers (Documentary short)

1953 Fear and Desire

1951 Day of the Fight (Documentary short)

1951 Flying Padre (Documentary short)

there's a number of Films that don't appear on this list... guess what they were..

Political Animal

Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?

Who is online