Evolution is not a scientific theory

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
Aussie

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Aussie » Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:03 pm

freediver wrote:Boxy I am the one trying to clarify what science can and cannot do. What do you think I have been doing all through this thread?
Dunno about boxy, but for me it seems you have been doing nothing apart from being your usual smart-arse, supercilious self.

Morning mist

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Morning mist » Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:20 pm

Aussie wrote:
freediver wrote:Boxy I am the one trying to clarify what science can and cannot do. What do you think I have been doing all through this thread?
Dunno about boxy, but for me it seems you have been doing nothing apart from being your usual smart-arse, supercilious self.
Hi Aussie.

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Neferti » Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:01 pm

Hi morning mist .... why do you only come out in the morning?

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Neferti » Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:04 pm

Aussie wrote:
freediver wrote:Boxy I am the one trying to clarify what science can and cannot do. What do you think I have been doing all through this thread?
Dunno about boxy, but for me it seems you have been doing nothing apart from being your usual smart-arse, supercilious self.
That is your opinion, Aussie.
And it is your right to state it.

Why don't you google and see what a "sense of humour" means. :rose

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by boxy » Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:51 pm

freediver wrote:Boxy I am the one trying to clarify what science can and cannot do. What do you think I have been doing all through this thread?
No idea. I zoned out for most of it.

Trying to claim that evolution by natural selection isn't an entirely scientific attempt to explain the process by which the current degree of biodiversity has arisen just seems like trolling, to me.

No idea why you'd want to compare it to "teh ultimate question"...
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Aussie

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Aussie » Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:01 pm

Shouldn't this....................
Trying to claim that evolution by natural selection isn't an entirely scientific attempt to explain the process by which the current degree of biodiversity has arisen just seems like trolling, to me.
.......read:

Trying to claim that theorised evolution by natural selection isn't an entirely scientific attempt to explain the process by which the current degree of biodiversity has arisen just seems like trolling, to me.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by boxy » Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:04 pm

Piss off, arsie.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Aussie

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Aussie » Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:10 pm

boxy wrote:Piss off, arsie.
You're no fun at all, poxie.

8-)

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by freediver » Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:05 pm

Trying to claim that evolution by natural selection isn't an entirely scientific attempt to explain the process by which the current degree of biodiversity has arisen just seems like trolling, to me.
It is the truth. Why should my reason be any different from your reason for attempting to clarify the limits of science?
No idea why you'd want to compare it to "teh ultimate question"...
I don't think anyone made such a comparison.

Aussie

Re: Evolution is not a scientific theory

Post by Aussie » Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:10 pm

Ya see, this is where the smart-arse does the supercilious.
It is the truth.
Yet, he does not specifically identify what he is referring to as 'the truth.' It is like wrestling custard.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests