One life

[Auzgurl]

="Rainbow Moonlight"]What- you think it is not okay to kill foetuses whom will exist in a vegetative state but right to kill ones that won't do so?

Confusingly written but Ill give it a go..

1- I never said that..

2- Dont twist my words

Of course it is wrong to kill them- just, in my view more legitimate than to kill one for a selfish and self-seeking and convenience based reason.

There can be no more selfish and self serving/self seeking reason than this one. A parent who wants an abortion because she/he does not have the committment to his/her own flesh to take care of the life THEY created. Killing is killing did you not say that.?

And you are right I guess- we cannot know the experience of life of another, but the suggestion I made was based on IF the baby would be spending their life that way.

sorry that doesnt make sense?

If as you say it is impossible to know or determine when an adult or child or baby is in a vegetative state- unaware of surroundings and living and touch etc - then it means it is impossible for it ever to be even that little bit legitimate to kill the foetus isn't it?

Yes- but I never said one thing and then contradicted myself. I only question here where you really stand on the pro life arguement and according to you ,you really havent given any thought to killing a life..so you really dont get it as you said you did.

It seems we have differing veiws on what actually constitutes a life..wether we consider the life of one more superior than the next.


I'm glad we cleared that up!

[Rainbow Moonlight]

Whatever you want from me it clearly isn't rational argument. I'm out of this little misrepresentation and baiting exercise of yours.

[Auzgurl]

Whatever you want from me it clearly isn't rational argument. I'm out of this little misrepresentation and baiting exercise of yours.

OK then conclusion..

Rainbow Moonlight lies about her stance on abortion and the rights of the fetus and therefore owes one or 2 people an apology for standing from an ever so great height and pissing on the honest folk who took time to debate her on that premise.


And when she said that she understood what it meant to exstinguish a life, that she fully undertsood the gravity of that decision could and would detract from her humanity..she did..a little bit!- but not really.


Apparently the poor unfortunate "broken ones" aren't real pple

[Aussie]

Auzgirl, do me favour.

Do a dot point presentation of what you reckon RW's position on abortion is.

[Auzgurl]

Auzgirl, do me favour.

Do a dot point presentation of what you reckon RW's position on abortion is.

Your habit of wet nursing is very endearing Aussie - not.

[Aussie]

Auzgirl, do me favour.

Do a dot point presentation of what you reckon RW's position on abortion is.

Your habit of wet nursing is very endearing Aussie - not.

ele has never needed any 'wet nursing' from anyone, let alone me.

However, It seems you might if you cannot:

Do a dot point presentation of what you reckon RW's position on abortion is.

If you can't:

(a) "I'm glad we cleared that up!" and;

(b) "OK then conclusion.."