mantra wrote:
It depends on an individual's approach to rehabilitation and that applies to both sexes. Lately women are being punished more for their crimes in relation to child abuse - and so they should be. I'm not sure about drug crimes, but it seems that males generally take more risks and do more damage when it comes to larceny and violence. When was the last time a female was charged with manslaughter/murder after king hitting someone?
Bullshit! ... About the only thing other than Social security fraud that gets women gaoled/jailed is killing her kids, and even then sometimes they get off on some mental illness excuse.
A man and a woman (neither with children to obscure the issue) can go to court for a quantity of illegal drugs. He will most likely go to gaol/jail and she almost never will (in OZ not SE Asia). Regardless of whether they're co-accused or separate instances. Typically he'll do time and she'll go to a rehab, and maybe get probation.
A man and a woman can do an armed hold up or bag snatch together, he goes to gaol/jail, she gets a good behaviour bond.
Most shop lifters are female, and very rarely are gaoled/jailed for it.
In Bundy (like many other hick towns) men are gaoled/jailed for drunken assaults semi-regularly. A group of 11 Aboriginal women routinely bashed and robbed old drunks in North Bundy for years on end. It wasn't until 4 of them attacked 4 (male) Irish backbackers for refusing cigaretes that 4 of them got 6 months.
Anyway, this isn't just about men not being equal to women under the law, as the family court demonstrates regularly. Or the fact that women generally aren't held responsible for their actions because men are typically held responsible for women's actions. This is about women being given unfair advantages in every aspect of our society at virtually every level and women complaining it's not good enough or they're getting a raw deal.
In legal matters there's Women's Legal Services funded by the taxpayer.
In education there's heaps of women only programs at unis to get more women into uni despite women outnumbering men in unis for years now.
In politics one party (ALP) has a gerrymander as part of their Affirmative Action scheme making a candidate pre-selection vote for a woman worth 1.4 votes for a male candidate.
Actually, in a way that's good, because it's destroying the ALP.
In Bundy the ALP preselected a real estate agent Garry Parr (a local), but head office used the gerrymander to install one of the female cronies, who it turned out to be was directly implicated in the Jayant Patel (Dr Death) scandal cover-up and whipped him out of the country to try and avoid his prosecution.
The result? ... Most of their branch members refused to hand out HTVs for the ALP.
In the Greens, the favouritism to female candidates is so overt they don't need a policy to enforce it. It's taken for granted. I remember sitting at a Qld Greens State Council or Conference meeting when some old sheila starts banging on about making sure at least 50% of Greens MPs are women. At the time the Greens had 8 reps OZ wide and Bob Brown was the only male. One bloke Asked "Does that mean the Greens should select more male candidates so we can achieve a gender balance?". The hags shut up.
I quit the Greens, my office bearing positions, and the Greens media list in 2008, but their reps regularly bombard my inbox with their rants and requests for money.
Now I know Larissa Waters personally. I like Larissa, she's reasonably smart for a woman, and I've never heard her go off on some femi-nazi rant depicting males as perpetrators and females as victims as per typical dingbat whinge.
But recently I got an email asking to sign her petition about "the domestic violence epidemic". Well Larissa can jam her grandstanding up her coit.
This so called domestic violence epidemic is a fantasy.
BTW, feminist orgs consider 'refusing to give money' as domestic violence.
A NSW female Police officer told me women are responsible for 40% of domestic violence, but almost none gets charged or even reported, let alone convicted.
Heard a quote once, stating 70% of domestic disputes are over money.
I would hazzard a guess that 90% of that 70% are the woman complaining about money the man hasn't got, and other other 10% is the man having a hissy fit over her squandering money on frivilous items required to pay bills.
I went to court 4 times because a woman washing anti-depressants down with white wine accused me of something that never happened. Next thing I've got feminist social wankers ringing me up asking why I'm behaving in such ways? .. I told them they should get their facts straight and don't ring me again.
Then I saw some femi-nazi bullshit artist (they're all liars) from a women's legal service justifying her job because "It's so hard to get a DVO".
Absolute bullshit! .. Anyone can go to a Chamber Magistrate, make any unsubstantiated claim they like against someone without a shred of evidence, and that unsubstantiated claim remains against that person's name forever.
I haven't had many violent girlfriends, but one who attacked me in my sleep 3 times, got her nose broken on the 3rd occasion. If women don't want to get beaten up, they should stop picking fights they can't win.
I think feminists should be rounded up with cattle dogs, put on sheep transport ships and sold to Muslims.
As far as the Affirmative Action agenda blatantly destroying our society, I figure the only good that will come of it, is by giving the femi-nazi dingbats enough rope they'll hang their cause.
Once they've destroyed our society and our civilisation falters, they'll learn about equality the hard way. And they won't enjoy it one little bit.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
