The PA Reichtards
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
-
Humble Questioner
The PA Reichtards
The PA Reichtards have hijacked our board and run out anyone who doesn't agree with them. What can we do to take back our board?
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: The PA Reichtards
Don't let anyone run you off, come back and defend your piece of the turf.Humble Questioner wrote:The PA Reichtards have hijacked our board and run out anyone who doesn't agree with them. What can we do to take back our board?
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: The PA Reichtards
Grow a spine and post... that's all they do.Humble Questioner wrote:The PA Reichtards have hijacked our board and run out anyone who doesn't agree with them. What can we do to take back our board?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: The PA Reichtards
I understand, you're a lefty and you're too scared to post here without the standard leftwing protection of heavy handed moderation.
I know, it must be terrifying to be bludgeoned with your own lies, but even if you believed your own lies, you could at least stand up with the courage of your convictions but I guess that too is a scary prospect for you. Having to face your own lies under a barrage of facts, morality and principles means you would only have two choices, either to engage and defend your lies or cower behind your keyboard and snipe away from the sidelines under anonymity.
Of course you could always try the Mantra defence and cry, sob and whinge every time you got caught out in a lie and pretend that it was 'just an embellishment-everyone does it' or 'I was just being colourful' then cry, sob and moan to the mods that 'everyone is being horrible to me and it will turn other posters away, so please shut everyone up so I can continue to lie and lie and lie'.
That didnt exactly work out the way she planned, did it...
I know, it must be terrifying to be bludgeoned with your own lies, but even if you believed your own lies, you could at least stand up with the courage of your convictions but I guess that too is a scary prospect for you. Having to face your own lies under a barrage of facts, morality and principles means you would only have two choices, either to engage and defend your lies or cower behind your keyboard and snipe away from the sidelines under anonymity.
Of course you could always try the Mantra defence and cry, sob and whinge every time you got caught out in a lie and pretend that it was 'just an embellishment-everyone does it' or 'I was just being colourful' then cry, sob and moan to the mods that 'everyone is being horrible to me and it will turn other posters away, so please shut everyone up so I can continue to lie and lie and lie'.
That didnt exactly work out the way she planned, did it...
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
AiA in Atlanta
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm
Re: The PA Reichtards
"Reichtards," I love it 
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: The PA Reichtards
If only! I'd love to have a barcode and a railcart ready and waiting for leftysAiA in Atlanta wrote:"Reichtards," I love it
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Guest
Re: The PA Reichtards
Too bad you were born to late to be a Nazi concentration camp guard and instead have to settle for a lifetime of boredom at the call center IQ!!!IQS.RLOW wrote:If only! I'd love to have a barcode and a railcart ready and waiting for leftysAiA in Atlanta wrote:"Reichtards," I love it
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: The PA Reichtards
We could us this innovation as a punishment here.
A 125 years of being locked in a room with IQ done in 1 hour. The PA a clockwork orange in the making.
Prisoners 'could serve 1,000 year sentence in eight hours'
Future biotechnology could be used to make prisoners feel as if they were serving a 1,000 year sentence, a team of scientists claim
Future biotechnology could be used to trick a prisoner's mind into thinking they have served a 1,000 year sentence, a group of scientists have claimed.
Philosopher Rebecca Roache is in charge of a team of scholars focused upon the ways futuristic technologies might transform punishment. Dr Roache claims the prison sentence of serious criminals could be made worse by extending their lives.
Speaking to Aeon magazine, Dr Roache said drugs could be developed to distort prisoners' minds into thinking time was passing more slowly.
"There are a number of psychoactive drugs that distort people’s sense of time, so you could imagine developing a pill or a liquid that made someone feel like they were serving a 1,000-year sentence," she said.
A second scenario would be to upload human minds to computers to speed up the rate at which the mind works, she wrote on her blog.
"If the speed-up were a factor of a million, a millennium of thinking would be accomplished in eight and a half hours... Uploading the mind of a convicted criminal and running it a million times faster than normal would enable the uploaded criminal to serve a 1,000 year sentence in eight-and-a-half hours. This would, obviously, be much cheaper for the taxpayer than extending criminals’ lifespans to enable them to serve 1,000 years in real time."
Thirty years in prison is currently the most severe punishment available in the UK legal system.
"To me, these questions about technology are interesting because they force us to rethink the truisms we currently hold about punishment. When we ask ourselves whether it’s inhumane to inflict a certain technology on someone, we have to make sure it’s not just the unfamiliarity that spooks us," Dr Roache said.
"Is it really OK to lock someone up for the best part of the only life they will ever have, or might it be more humane to tinker with their brains and set them free? When we ask that question, the goal isn’t simply to imagine a bunch of futuristic punishments – the goal is to look at today’s punishments through the lens of the future."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/n ... hours.html
A 125 years of being locked in a room with IQ done in 1 hour. The PA a clockwork orange in the making.
Prisoners 'could serve 1,000 year sentence in eight hours'
Future biotechnology could be used to make prisoners feel as if they were serving a 1,000 year sentence, a team of scientists claim
Future biotechnology could be used to trick a prisoner's mind into thinking they have served a 1,000 year sentence, a group of scientists have claimed.
Philosopher Rebecca Roache is in charge of a team of scholars focused upon the ways futuristic technologies might transform punishment. Dr Roache claims the prison sentence of serious criminals could be made worse by extending their lives.
Speaking to Aeon magazine, Dr Roache said drugs could be developed to distort prisoners' minds into thinking time was passing more slowly.
"There are a number of psychoactive drugs that distort people’s sense of time, so you could imagine developing a pill or a liquid that made someone feel like they were serving a 1,000-year sentence," she said.
A second scenario would be to upload human minds to computers to speed up the rate at which the mind works, she wrote on her blog.
"If the speed-up were a factor of a million, a millennium of thinking would be accomplished in eight and a half hours... Uploading the mind of a convicted criminal and running it a million times faster than normal would enable the uploaded criminal to serve a 1,000 year sentence in eight-and-a-half hours. This would, obviously, be much cheaper for the taxpayer than extending criminals’ lifespans to enable them to serve 1,000 years in real time."
Thirty years in prison is currently the most severe punishment available in the UK legal system.
"To me, these questions about technology are interesting because they force us to rethink the truisms we currently hold about punishment. When we ask ourselves whether it’s inhumane to inflict a certain technology on someone, we have to make sure it’s not just the unfamiliarity that spooks us," Dr Roache said.
"Is it really OK to lock someone up for the best part of the only life they will ever have, or might it be more humane to tinker with their brains and set them free? When we ask that question, the goal isn’t simply to imagine a bunch of futuristic punishments – the goal is to look at today’s punishments through the lens of the future."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/n ... hours.html
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests