Synthetic Drugs

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
User avatar
Mattus
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Internationalist

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by Mattus » Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:52 am

boxy wrote:
Mattus wrote:
boxy wrote:Then declare them recreational drugs, and place similar (or even more stringent) regulations upon them?
But recreational drugs are all prohibited.
So how did these types of drugs slip through the cracks? I'm drinking a beer now. Could be happily taking a drag on a ciggy, if I wanted, and wake up with a coffee in the morning.

Na, they're not universally prohibited.
Beer and coffee are regulated as foods, as you must already be aware. I'm not certain about tobacco but probably regulated as a poison?
"I may be the first man to put a testicle in Germaine Greer's mouth"

-Heston Blumenthal

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7259
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:03 am

Synthetic cannabis used to be available in Australia but not sure what the status is now. That stuff scares me. The real stuff does not. Just enjoyed a cannabis lolly the other week.

User avatar
AnimalMother
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 2:48 pm

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by AnimalMother » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:42 pm

The only reason these "synthetic drugs" exist in the first place, is because stupid prohibition laws against safer drugs were introduced last century.

It's way past time to renounce those laws, and start working to undo the damage they've caused.
Aqualung my friend -
Don't you start away uneasy
You poor old sod, you see,
It's only me

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:11 pm

Even now, the chemists are finding ways to take two innocuous substances by themselves but when metabolised by the body together creates a drug like high.

Nootropics is an interesting study in how to be a crash test drug dummy.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
AnimalMother
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 2:48 pm

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by AnimalMother » Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:25 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:Even now, the chemists are finding ways to take two innocuous substances by themselves but when metabolised by the body together creates a drug like high.

Nootropics is an interesting study in how to be a crash test drug dummy.
Indeed it is.

I'll just stick with the old school. Safer that way. XD
Aqualung my friend -
Don't you start away uneasy
You poor old sod, you see,
It's only me

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11787
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by Super Nova » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:00 pm

AnimalMother wrote:The only reason these "synthetic drugs" exist in the first place, is because stupid prohibition laws against safer drugs were introduced last century.

It's way past time to renounce those laws, and start working to undo the damage they've caused.
Totally agree.

War is over. Druggies win.

Legalise, tax it, control the quality of the drugs, kill the black market....
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by boxy » Tue Jun 11, 2013 9:16 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:Synthetics are not easier to define. That's the whole issue with them. It's why the manufacturers can skirt current drug laws and detection- they are undefinable for regulation which is why Australia has analogue drug laws in an effort as a catch all which then acts as an incentive for the manufacturers to further push the envelope in chemical composition.
Yes, I understand that it's almost impossible to legislate against them, and in that way they are hard to define.

However, surely it is piss easy to define individual synthetic chemicals as being "safe for sale". Something that is mixed up in a lab (as opposed to grown) can be tested to be within extremely tight tolerances.

Find something safe, get it approved, and then mass produce it at levels that criminals can't even hope to compete with.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:00 pm

boxy wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:Synthetics are not easier to define. That's the whole issue with them. It's why the manufacturers can skirt current drug laws and detection- they are undefinable for regulation which is why Australia has analogue drug laws in an effort as a catch all which then acts as an incentive for the manufacturers to further push the envelope in chemical composition.
Yes, I understand that it's almost impossible to legislate against them, and in that way they are hard to define.

However, surely it is piss easy to define individual synthetic chemicals as being "safe for sale". Something that is mixed up in a lab (as opposed to grown) can be tested to be within extremely tight tolerances.

Find something safe, get it approved, and then mass produce it at levels that criminals can't even hope to compete with.
:roll: Let me know how you get on with your FDA approvals for your 'safe' synthetics when coke, morphine, hooch and MDMA are already defined and are the base line for the chemical composition for synthetics and the object of the chemistry is to deviate enough from them to achieve the same effect but skirt the tests.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Synthetic Drugs

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:49 pm

This entire scenario illustrates the absurdity of drug prohibitions .. of any sort .. and suggests the Dutch got it right/correct when legalising drugs and educating the population .. so it's "Take it/the stuff if you want, but this is the likely/possible/potential outcome/result .. so don't expect any sympathy for being a junkie" .. or dead.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests