Huge terrorist attack in Sri Lanka

[brian ross]

COPENHAGEN: Denmark's richest man Anders Holch Povlsen and his wife lost three of their four children in the Easter Sunday attacks in Sri Lanka, a spokesman for Povlsen's fashion firm said on Monday.

The spokesman declined to give any further details but Danish media said the family had been on holiday in Sri Lanka.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/sri-lan ... ks-2026733

What a horrible thing. 3 out of 4 of his children are now gone. Maybe Mr Povlsen will take up the 'good fight'.

It is indeed a horrible thing to have occured. But, Black Orchid what is the "good fight" in your view? Persecution of innocent Muslims simply because they share a religion with the Islamists? Attacking innocent Muslims? Evicting innocent Muslims from their homelands because they are afterall, Muslims and share a religion with the Islamists? Tsk, tsk.

[Nicole]

I have a friend who now lives in Sri Lanka and I have no clue if she is ok or not. She is a muslim though so I assume she is ok.

Well looka that, Bri Bri. Black Orchid has a Muslim friend.

So go eat shit.

[Black Orchid]

Any criticism of Islamic terrorism, violence and murder is criticism of ALL muslims in the eyes of these SJW nutjobs didn't you know? Then they try to vilify you by flapping their arms and calling you nasty names

The tide is changing though and about time too.

[sprintcyclist]

Any criticism of Islamic terrorism, violence and murder is criticism of ALL muslims in the eyes of these SJW nutjobs didn't you know? Then they try to vilify you by flapping their arms and calling you nasty names

The tide is changing though and about time too.

yes, it is changing.

sjws no longer win by condescending or insulting remarks

[Black Orchid]

Only leftists understand that one must vote left no matter who the Democrat is, no matter who the Republican opponent is. Leftists are completely interchangeable: There is no ideological difference among the 20 or so Democrats running for president. Mayor Pete Buttigieg is not one degree to the right of Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren.

That is why it is important to understand Clinton and Obama's tweets: to understand the left, not to understand her or him.

Here are the tweets:

Obama: "The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity. On a day devoted to love, redemption, and renewal, we pray for the victims and stand with the people of Sri Lanka."

Three hours later, Clinton tweeted: "On this holy weekend for many faiths, we must stand united against hatred and violence. I'm praying for everyone affected by today's horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers in Sri Lanka."

As they both spelled "worshipers" the same idiosyncratic way and used the term "Easter worshippers," it is likely they either had the same writers or Clinton copied Obama.

Here's what's critical: Neither used the word "Christians." And in order to avoid doing so, they went so far as to make up a new term -- "Easter worshippers" -- heretofore unknown to any Christian.

When Jews were murdered at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Clinton mentioned the synagogue in a tweet. But in her post-Sri Lanka tweet, despite the bombing of three churches filled with Christians, Clinton made no mention of church or churches. In a tweet after the massacre of Muslims in New Zealand, she wrote that her heart broke for "the global Muslim community." But in her latest tweet, not a word about Christians or the global Christian community.

Obama similarly wrote in his tweet about New Zealand that he was grieving with "the Muslim community" over the "horrible massacre in the Mosques." But in his tweet about Sri Lanka, there is no mention of Christians or churches.

The reason neither of them mentioned Christians or churches is that the left has essentially forbidden mention of all the anti-Christian murders perpetrated by Muslims in Europe, the Middle East and Africa and of all the Muslim desecration of churches in Europe, Africa and anywhere else. This is part of the same phenomenon -- that I and others have documented -- of British police and politicians covering up six years of rape of 1,400 of English girls by Muslim "grooming gangs" in Rotherham and elsewhere in England.

Essentially, the left's rule is that nothing bad -- no matter how true -- may be said about Muslims or Islam and nothing good -- no matter how true -- may be said of Christians or Christianity.

Clinton's post-New Zealand tweet also included these words: "We must continue to fight the perpetuation and normalization of Islamophobia and racism in all its forms. White supremacist terrorists must be condemned by leaders everywhere. Their murderous hatred must be stopped."

She made sure to condemn "Islamophobia," but she wrote not a word about the far more destructive and widespread hatred of Christians in the Muslim world, seen in Muslims' virtual elimination of the Christian communities in the Middle East, the regular murder and kidnappings of Coptic Christians in Egypt and the murder of Christians in Nigeria. She calls on "leaders everywhere" to condemn "white supremacist terrorists," one of the smallest hate groups on Earth, but never calls on leaders everywhere to condemn Islamist terrorists, the largest hate group on Earth.

These two tweets tell you a lot about Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. But far more importantly, they tell you a lot about the left.

https://townhall.com/columnists/dennisp ... s-n2545189

[brian ross]

Any criticism of Islamic terrorism, violence and murder is criticism of ALL muslims in the eyes of these SJW nutjobs didn't you know? Then they try to vilify you by flapping their arms and calling you nasty names

The tide is changing though and about time too.

In your mind, perhaps, Black Orchid. However, you lump all Muslims together with the Terrorists, simply because they are all, afterall Muslims. So, to you, even the victims of Daesh who are afterall, Muslims, are the same as the followers of Daesh, in your mind? Really? How about the victims of al Qaeda or the Taliban? They are all afterall, Muslims, yet they are attacking one another on the basis of theologican schisms they have in their views. Rather like how the Protestants and the Catholics used to attack one another, like how the PIRA and the Unionists used to like murdering and blowing each other up in Londonderray and Belfast. According to, because they are all Christians, they should all be treated the same.

[brian ross]

Any criticism of Islamic terrorism, violence and murder is criticism of ALL muslims in the eyes of these SJW nutjobs didn't you know? Then they try to vilify you by flapping their arms and calling you nasty names

The tide is changing though and about time too.

yes, it is changing.

sjws no longer win by condescending or insulting remarks

Calling someone an "Islamophobe" on the basis of their remarks isn't actually insulting, Sprint. It is correctly using the English language. Appears you don't care to be called by the correct name for your arguments. I wonder why?

[Black Orchid]

Any criticism of Islamic terrorism, violence and murder is criticism of ALL muslims in the eyes of these SJW nutjobs didn't you know? Then they try to vilify you by flapping their arms and calling you nasty names

The tide is changing though and about time too.

In your mind, perhaps, Black Orchid. However, you lump all Muslims together with the Terrorists, simply because they are all, afterall Muslims. So, to you, even the victims of Daesh who are afterall, Muslims, are the same as the followers of Daesh, in your mind? Really? How about the victims of al Qaeda or the Taliban? They are all afterall, Muslims, yet they are attacking one another on the basis of theologican schisms they have in their views. Rather like how the Protestants and the Catholics used to attack one another, like how the PIRA and the Unionists used to like murdering and blowing each other up in Londonderray and Belfast. According to, because they are all Christians, they should all be treated the same.

Ditch the lame psychology attempt and stick to Podunk, WA

[brian ross]

Any criticism of Islamic terrorism, violence and murder is criticism of ALL muslims in the eyes of these SJW nutjobs didn't you know? Then they try to vilify you by flapping their arms and calling you nasty names

The tide is changing though and about time too.

In your mind, perhaps, Black Orchid. However, you lump all Muslims together with the Terrorists, simply because they are all, afterall Muslims. So, to you, even the victims of Daesh who are afterall, Muslims, are the same as the followers of Daesh, in your mind? Really? How about the victims of al Qaeda or the Taliban? They are all afterall, Muslims, yet they are attacking one another on the basis of theologican schisms they have in their views. Rather like how the Protestants and the Catholics used to attack one another, like how the PIRA and the Unionists used to like murdering and blowing each other up in Londonderray and Belfast. According to, because they are all Christians, they should all be treated the same.

Ditch the lame psychology attempt and stick to Podunk, WA

Lame insults to replace debate, wow, I always thought this place was different to ozpolitics. Appears I was mistaken...

[Valkie]

Its totally overwhelming

The COMPASSION, the support, offers of help and money

The outpouring of grief and charity from the Islamic community

It puts Christchurch to shame

Who am I kidding, muzzos don't give a shite
Unless of course they can gain something or get something for nothing

This CULT OF DEATH is brutal, murderous and twisted in the extreme.
There are no moderate muzzos, they are all tarred with the same brush
They follow a sociopath, lying, retarded, self confessed pedophile, cowardly, piece of filth Muhammid the mad.

The CULT OF DEATH known nothing but murder, killing and depraved acts
All muzzos follow the same nutcase, all are potential terrorists
All are dangerous and only waiting for a chance.

It's time to end this carnage
Over 800 Christian churches targeted
Over 300 people in this last twisted murderous act
How many millions more must die before we get rid of this CULT OF DEATH