brian ross wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:53 pm
Personally, I am getting fed up with the childish tit-for-tat back and forth between the Republicans, the Democrats, el Presidente Trump and everybody else. I think it's time they all packed up and went home and handed the reins of power back to the UK. Queen Elizabeth and even BoJo could do a better job than they seem capable of. Time for the world to have a rest from the bullshit that the US media bombards us with nightly. Time we all had a Christmas present and the whole shebang was handed over to Westminster until the yanks start acting like adults and took responsibility for their own actions. Tsk, tsk.
The4thEstate wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:34 am
As bad as it is in the entrenched federal bureaucracy -- which explains why American voters put a disruptor like Trump in the White House -- I hardly see how it would improve anything to put ourselves under the control of the Brits, who can't even pull off a proper divorce from the EU without shedding Prime Ministers like ballast from a hot-air balloon.
Plus, we'd be selling out our sovereignty to a gaggle of unelected Eurocrats in Brussels, whose most fervent desire is to transform the continent into a Third World spillway packed with hordes of Middle East Muslims, Africans and others so unfamiliar with modern Western society that they need instructions to figure out how to use a flush toilet.
But look, if you're tired of listening to the U.S. media, my suggestion is that you do what most Americans do -- ignore it.
brian ross wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:06 pm
You may like to believe that about Trump but I am fairly sure he has simply replaced the old swamp with a new swamp, 4E.

An assertion that, as usual, is backed up by ... nothing.
brian ross wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:06 pm
However, the point I am making is that the US political system is pretty well fucked, well and truly. Doesn't matter who is in charge or who is on the bottom, the whole thing has been corrupted. Americans have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted with Government. They have become too partisan.
If the entire system were truly corrupted, an outsider like Trump would never have stood a chance of being elected in the first place.
But let's be frank here: You're only making that declaration because you're trapped in an ideological corner.
If you embrace Trump's outsider status in contrast to the D.C. establishment, you'll never be able sit at the lefty cool kids' lunch table again.
But if you embrace the existing order that Trump is in the process of disrupting, you're on the same side that gave America the corruption in the FBI and other federal agencies.
So, rather than admit that Trump might actually be doing the country good, your only way out is to curse the entire political system. Hey, I get it: It's a way out, if not an honest one.
brian ross wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:06 pm
I am not claiming that the UK (note, not the EU) system is perfect. Far from it. However the British appear to be able to act much more responsibly and can accept responsibility for their actions. If you ignore BREXIT for the moment, the Westminster system seems to be run by adults.
Oh, yeah ... that's readily apparent in the way Parliament is conducted. Like the way the entire body dissolves into a 3rd grade food fight around the 1:00 mark in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xJlPO5jqE8
brian ross wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:06 pm
I am unsure why you are mixing the Westminster system with the EU system. They are two completely separate political systems - which for the moment are connected but as we all know, that is about to end. Like a typical Ignorant American, I expect you believe that the Queen rules the UK and controls the Government?
"Typical ignorant American."
Ah, going ad hominem again, are we? Naughty, naughty Brian!
I'll throw you a bone and explain my viewpoint in terms that perhaps even you can understand: The EU indeed affects UK sovereignty, and I believe Brits, like any nation's citizens, should have full control over their own laws. (P.S. I feel the same way about the U.N.)
If you still doubt me, here's a little light reading for you:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 43256.html
What is 1972 European Communities Act?
The UK Parliament passed the European Communities Act in 1972 which gave instant effect to EU law. This means if there is a clash between an act of UK Parliament and EU Law, EU law will always succeed.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) interprets EU law with judgments that were binding on all member states.
And if you're still having trouble understanding the big words, take a look at what happens when a nation like Hungary decides to buck an EU edict on immigration:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hung ... SKCN1PI1FP
BRUSSELS/BUDAPEST (Reuters) - The European Commission said on Thursday it was taking its legal procedure against Hungary to the next step after Budapest criminalised support for migrants, moving the case closer to a possible ruling by the European Court of Justice. The EU says Hungary’s tough stance has breached EU law.
But ... but ... but how could EU law be dominant over Hungarian law if, like the UK, Hungary has an entirely different political system than the EU?