When I get home last night, Gigi our daughter just ran into my arms and I talked to her and she said, ‘Mummy, I missed you’ and I said, ‘I missed you too, baby’ and she goes, ‘Where’s daddy?’ What do you tell a three-year-old? She’s three.
“I said, ‘Baby, daddy loves you so much. Don’t you worry, he’s on a work trip with Jesus so he can afford your blueberry budget’.
This broke me...
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
Members of the European Parliament dramatically refused a request to honor Charlie Kirk with a a moment of silence in the chamber Thursday.
Swedish MEP Charlie Weimers of the European Conservatives and Reformists group, asked colleagues Thursday to pause proceedings in the house and to "declare that our right to freedom of speech cannot be extinguished."
When Weimers went on to give up his remaining speaking time for a moment of silence, Vice President Katarina Barley cut him off, sparking desk-banging protests from right-wing lawmakers in the chamber.
Outside the chamber, Hungarian Fidesz MEP András László accused Parliament of hypocrisy, pointing out it had previously honored George Floyd but refused Kirk.
One person fired the bullet that murdered Charlie Kirk.
But there’s something we need to get out of politics: the ramping up of freedom of speech into the equivalent of violence.
“Words are violence”
“Micro-aggressions”
“His words made me feel unsafe”
“Jokes are harassment”
“His words made people attack me and I had to call the police”.
Once the idea that ‘words are violence’ is popularised, it makes some people think that real violence is justified in response.
Laws that interfere with freedom of speech in Australia
3.31 Commonwealth laws prohibit, or render unlawful, speech or expression in many different contexts, and include:
criminal laws;
secrecy laws;
contempt laws;
anti-discrimination laws;
media, broadcasting and telecommunications laws;
information laws; and
intellectual property laws.[53]
3.32 These laws are summarised below. Some of the justifications that have been advanced for laws that interfere with freedom of speech, and public criticisms of laws on that basis, are also discussed.