Howard/Costello myth of good economic managers gone

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
Jovial Monk

Howard/Costello myth of good economic managers gone

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat May 16, 2009 10:53 am

Not even the OO is trying to shore up the myth anymore:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st ... 71,00.html

9% growth in spending, aimed solely at buying elections and made possible by the mining boom. Well, we have no mining boom today, the mild recession we are suffering was sufficient to lay bare the crap economic management by the economic vandals, V1 & V2.
Going to families earning up to $150,000 a year, the $17 billion in family tax benefits is Canberra's third biggest spending program after grants to the states and the age pension. It means that families earning up to $60,000 effectively pay no or little tax. The problem is that the revenue bonanza supporting Howard's grand political strategy has collapsed with the end of the resources boom and the grip of recession. And, with hindsight, the federal Treasury argues Howardism could only be sustained while sky-high prices for Australia's iron ore and coal exports were pumping up national income and, with it, the national tax base.
By stopping/reducing this churn of paying tax and claiming all of it back (and sometimes more) Swan should be able to affect major efficiencies at the ATO: free up manpower to spend more time on auditing businesses!

Swan has to stop the recession causing wholesale unemployment and try and undo the damage from V1 & V2. Expect a concerted attack on middleclass welfare over the next decade at least! (Oh, yeah, LOW_IQ defines middle class welfare as the rich being taxed to pay for the very poor. Poor, silly little fluffy bunny, that is not what middleclass welfare is: it is taking from those doing it tough to give to those doing quite well.

Swan has committed to a 2% limit to real spending over the next couple of terms. So any disaster, any need for govt spending needs to be financed by savings elsewhere. The Fibs will accept it, they are pretty much a spent force looking at the onrushing light of the train of their demographic doom. Crash!

I have been saying all this pretty much throughout the wasted decade.

Ethnic

Re: Howard/Costello myth of good economic managers gone

Post by Ethnic » Sun May 17, 2009 2:47 pm

Bloody true, middle class welfare was the worst thing to have ever happened to this country. It has created a dangerous level of dependency for the well-off. Australians used to be able to make sacrifices and save up for things but not now. Howard has embedded in them a sense of entitlement. I hope it fades away now and Rudd should not feed this monster anymore. Pumping unlimited money to those who have enough created a spending frenzy and now we have a young generation unable to buy homes, food etc. We also have a near empty bank account which is expected to get us through the tough times when we should have easily had a couple of hundred billion dollars to help us. I’m sick of paying for the tax benefits, health rebates, clean energy rebates and babies of those who earn way more than me. Fuck this shit. At least paid maternity leave will be means tested. That’s a surprise.

Jovial Monk

Re: Howard/Costello myth of good economic managers gone

Post by Jovial Monk » Sun May 17, 2009 3:17 pm

Wel, he wants to means test the health care rebate, the fibs will die in a ditch to protest this. You wonder why, more people than ever are joining private health funds right now!

Ethnic

Re: Howard/Costello myth of good economic managers gone

Post by Ethnic » Sun May 17, 2009 3:36 pm

I know but a large part of the Liberals' voter base are in the upper-middle/upper class who make full use of the health rebates so I guess Turnbull feels he needs to fight on their behalf, or some shit like that. Fuck them, they can afford to pay the full amount. They won't drop out because the medicare levy awaits them if they do anyway so what's the difference?

Jovial Monk

Re: Howard/Costello myth of good economic managers gone

Post by Jovial Monk » Sun May 17, 2009 3:51 pm

The "Howard Legacy" not that that looks so flash now without the mining boom, eh?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests