Saving Australia from the Greens:--and Chinas red army

[mellie]

30 November 2013 is the last possible date for the next federal election.

It is without question that a half-Senate election for Senators elected in 2007 cannot be held until after 1 July 2013.

Is it against the Constitution for another half-Senate election to be held for those seats contested on 21 August. Section 13 of the constitution states that those Senators elected 'shall' take their seats on 1 July 2011, but should we be attempting to issue writs for a half-Senate before that date, on the grounds of this government clearly having become too difficult to manage for either a Labor or even Liberal lead hand-over?

It's become apparent, that neither leading party wants anything to do with a global Green stick-in-the-mud endangering not only our economy, but many nations around the world.


After 1 July 2011, there is no question that a writ for those Senate seats cannot be issued until after 1 July 2016..... so if somethings not done by July 1...then we are stuck with the Greens until 2016, like it or lump it.

Surely there must be something we can do?

[skippy]

Surely there must be something we can do?

There is, get used to it,sweet thing.

[mellie]

Surely there must be something we can do?

There is, get used to it,sweet thing.

So you are OK with regressing to imperialist communism (China's watermelon global army) dressed up as environmentalism by world elitist c/o UN then?

Ie... losing our nations sovereignty, prosperity, based on what, pseudo-science designed to scare dumb westerners and greenopean do-gooders into voting for China's rise to global imperialism?

China are only out for themselves, if you own 600 acres of land they want, in another 10 years they will come in and take it, ..impossible you think?

Well, we have been doing this to other resource rich nations in the middle east for hundreds of years, so whats to stop them from doing this to us?


The 12th FYP is a globalist green development plan which marks China’s entry into the green technology development era. China are referring to this as the green revolution:--a historical moment: the point at which China launches more than Chinese New Years crackers– and enforces global action for responding to climate change on their terms. The positive effects will be enjoyed by China and their communist allies, but nations rich in resources, mass, and prosperity risk losing sovereignty, if the indigenous and Muslims think westerners are mean, just wait until China and allies decide to exterminate them in order to make way for toxic industry, only this time, in someone else's nation, and at our expense.

Our progeny will be forced to suffer as a consequence of China's population crisis they will solve by exterminating us to make way for their own creed.

Beware the sleeping red dragon, he seems quite and amicable enough now, but sooner or later, they will like bacteria, like all humans are biologically programmed to do, invade and engulf for the sole survival of their own colonies.

As bacteria does.

[mellie]

A friend of mine a geological physicist, (the one I mentioned re- The Japan thingy we are not supposed to discuss, due to sea water near Tokyo containing more than 1000 time the safe level of radiation) advises a number of countries are in strife, (apparently whats happening now is 200 or so years over due, it's cyclic, and a number of seismically active, and geologically compromised nations such as New Zealand are in fact sinking, (no, the seas are not rising)...and it's due to solar activity, and the magnetic, gravitational effect on our earths plates.

She insists New Zealand will sink, how much, I'm not sure, because I get most of my information from her brother, who is one of my best friends.

She advises the scientists at the (facility she works at) don't believe in a man-made climate change theory, rather believe it's a matter of them and us needing to prepare global economy wise. She says we are pretty right here, ( are not sinking)... are a geological safe-zone.

Apparently it's expected to be quite catastrophic and what we have been seeing in recent years is both hundreds of years overdue, and merely the start of a solar phase, (flares, apparently) ...Japan, China and New Zealand are among the nations who will bear the full brunt of it, and given China are notorious for spying on our government agencies, departments and research facilities, if she knows this, (not a big secret or anything).. then I would say, they know this too, meaning they need to prepare.

She also said some islands would completely sink. Ring of fire.

[harvey]

30 November 2013 is the last possible date for the next federal election.

Thatd be about right as I think that the latest the election has to be held about 3 months after the full term of the last election.
The last federal election was 21 Aug 10, and that was an early election, and the latest that last years election could have been held was in Feb11 (afterthe Nov07).


But it would be good if an election could be held this year, even a by-election for a ALP seat or even an independant seat. As the result would change the government.

[Jovial Monk]

An idiot dribbled:

As the result would change the government.

That would depend on the seat—and the support for the govt is rising. A byelection in a marginal Lib seat could increase the govt’s buffer which in any case is pretty good: neither Katter nor Crook are in any hurry to support the Coalition.

As the NBN just keeps rolling out, as the carbon tax compensation is spelled out I think it will be increasingly the coalition that will be anxious it won’t have any of its members dying or quitting.

Losing the NSW albatross won’t hurt the govt any either!

[harvey]

Only a fool would suggest that the ALP could claim/retain any federal seat at the moment - even Gillard would be struggling in her own seat.

[mellie]

Now, whether or not my friend and her colleagues are right or not I'm not sure, have to wait and see I guess... but this is our nations leading scientific institutes theory, not being divulged to the public.

Scientists are people too skip, they have to pay bills, live, work, study, this and are prone to error, but I have to say, I do find it odd that they are only discussing this theory off-the-record, (it's classified), of which contrasts greatly with a global warming theory we the public are being told we can manage by way of reducing carbon emissions.

Also, they are worried about space objects, communications systems, satellites, radiation levels etc, ... infrastructure, (global water shortages)..

[Jovial Monk]

Only a fool would read a discussion of trends as meaning RIGHT THE FUCK NOW!

[harvey]

Now, whether or not my friend and her colleagues are right or not I'm not sure, have to wait and see I guess... but this is our nations leading scientific institutes theory, not being divulged to the public.

Depending on the results of their research will determine whethe ror not Gillard would allow any results to be released.