New prime minister signals slowdown in Australian immigration to curb rapid population growth
By Rod McGuirk (CP) – 1 hour ago
CANBERRA, Australia — New Prime Minister Julia Gillard on Sunday signalled Australia's immigration intake will slow under her leadership as concerns grow about the nation's rapid population growth.
Gillard said she disagreed with her predecessor Kevin Rudd, who was ousted by the ruling Labor Party last week, on the "major issue" of population policy.
Rudd recently gave a speech endorsing a "big Australia," citing government statistics that on present immigration trends, Australia's population would grow from 22 million today to 35 million by 2050.
"I don't believe in a big Australia," Gillard told Nine Network television. "I don't believe in simply hurtling down a track to a 36 million or 40 million population."
Gillard, who immigrated as a child from Wales in 1966 when Australia's population was 11.5 million, said the key factor to determine future immigration rates should be governments' capacity to provide the roads and services needed to sustain a larger population.
She said she planned to appoint a new Minister for Sustainable Population to examine growth capacity when she announces her new Cabinet, probably this week.
Australia's population grew 2 per cent mainly through immigration last year — faster than any other developed country.
While Australia is relatively sparsely populated, factors such as a lack of water limit its potential for population growth.
The world's driest continent after Antarctica has endured years of drought that the government blames on global climate change and several cities plan to build desalination plants to create drinking water from the sea.
But 16 years of continuous economic growth driven by Chinese demand for Australian minerals and energy have created skill shortages that are often filled by immigrants.
The Australian Conservation Foundation, the nation's leading environmental group, has warned that population growth projections threaten biodiversity.
Lawmaker Kelvin Thomson, of Gillard's Labor Party, has argued Australia needs to cap its population at 26 million if it is serious about reducing its greenhouse gas emissions.
Copyright © 2010 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Gillard on Immigration
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Re: Gillard on Immigration
How gillard? rudd said big u say small, none of u say how. who votes for these fucksticks who talk and never follow through with anything that works
Last edited by punk on Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Gillard on Immigration
Now that's a sensible start. I agree that we should not being looking towards a large Australian population. Or at least, that increases in population should occur only when the infrastructure allows for it. Recycled water is the way of the future, but currently offers a limited supply. When that supply is more readily available with surpluses capable of sustaining a significant additional population then immigration should be increase with a mind to increasing basic services at the same time across all growth corridors.... which translate into Federal Funding for sensible and sustainable State planning.
Re: Gillard on Immigration
why do u keep humiliating urself. this is a load of mixed up rubbish. did u get it off the alp website? there is now a ten to twenty year need to slash budgets to repay alp debt. where will the funds for infrastructure come from u shit covered leftard? ur shitty arse?Sappho wrote:Now that's a sensible start. I agree that we should not being looking towards a large Australian population. Or at least, that increases in population should occur only when the infrastructure allows for it. Recycled water is the way of the future, but currently offers a limited supply. When that supply is more readily available with surpluses capable of sustaining a significant additional population then immigration should be increase with a mind to increasing basic services at the same time across all growth corridors.... which translate into Federal Funding for sensible and sustainable State planning.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests