Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Cuntroy, not content to dictate what you view online now wants to monitor all your online viewing habits and emails and force ISP to keep records.
http://www.news.com.au/technology/inter ... 5878467822
THE Federal Government is considering forcing internet providers like Telstra and Optus to keep records of what their customers do online.
The records could include people's web browsing history and emails and be held for several years, according to technology website ZDNet.
At the moment a warrant is needed before an internet service provider can begin logging a user's web browsing history.
The Attorney-General's Department said it was considering adopting a data retention scheme similar to one introduced in Europe after the Madrid train bombings.
Under that directive, passed by the European Union in 2006, telephone and internet companies are forced to log details of communications for up to two years.
Only details about the date and time of each phone call, or each time a user connects to the internet, are collected. The content of each communication is not stored.
However industry sources told ZDNet the scheme being considered by the Australian Government would be more far-reaching and could include tracking each website visited by users.
Oh dear- I wonder how Squealer will try and spin this as another brilliant Krudd policy?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f37/b2f374a6e5286029356d607dd92879bac6591674" alt="Laughing :lol:"
I suppose when you reach the mentally incompetent stage of preferring the population to live under a "1984" administration, anything is possible.
Krudd is gawn
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af392/af3924b67ad5a3636da64a74575ce6dbd848dc3e" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
-
Dovetail Joint
Post
by Dovetail Joint » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:19 pm
Bring back Howard.
-
pierre
Post
by pierre » Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:47 pm
I have a big brother. He saved me from being beaten up by the Frailey brothers in grade 4. Sometimes it's good to have a big brother. The Frailey bros may disagree.
-
Jovial Monk
Post
by Jovial Monk » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:17 pm
Yeah, bring back John Howard, bring him to the office of the Auditor General so he can explain why he costs the tax payer as much per year as Fraser, Hawke and Keating together. He could perhaps explain to the AG why he claims travel costs off the tax payer to travel to paid speaking engagements.
A disgusting little turd in or out of Parliament {shudder}
Last edited by Jovial Monk on Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:22 pm
He was worth 100x what Fraser, Hawke and Keating were to this country
But I suspect you are using selective accounting...as per usual. Tally up what Keatings costs were in his first year when he was tossed and compare it to ex-PM's 12-20 years prior.
You are as transparent, as your jellyfish spinal cord
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:34 pm
pierre wrote:I have a big brother. He saved me from being beaten up by the Frailey brothers in grade 4. Sometimes it's good to have a big brother. The Frailey bros may disagree.
It's nice that you feel the need to be protected from your inability to protect yourself...or your inability to stop seeking out childporn according to Cuntroy. The man is a fucking genius
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Users browsing this forum: tllwd and 19 guests