Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18243
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by Bobby » Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:07 am

King Charles inherited over 38 billion pounds
but he reckons he's short of a quid:


https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/queen-eli ... -1.6582244

Image

King Charles's staff told during mourning they could lose jobs   

Up to 100 household employees at Clarence House affected,
published media report says

Thomson Reuters · Posted: Sep 14, 2022 7:26 AM ET | Last Updated: 2 hours ago
The Public and Commercial Services Union condemned the decision to announce
redundancies during the mourning period as "heartless."

King Charles's staff told during mourning they could lose jobs
The notifications were issued even as they were working to assist the new King during the accession process

Groot
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by Groot » Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:20 am

But he will move to where the Queen lived so his old employees have nobody to look after. Is that what happened.

User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6275
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by Redneck » Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:26 am

Groot wrote:
Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:20 am
But he will move to where the Queen lived so his old employees have nobody to look after. Is that what happened.
Yeah thats it more or less as i understand it!

Thwakball
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2022 12:56 pm

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by Thwakball » Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:47 pm

The financial times reports
Clarence House said that the notice could affect as many as 100 employees, but “while some redundancies will be unavoidable”, the royal household was “working urgently to identify alternative roles for the greatest possible number of staff”.
and paragraphs later reports
But they also questioned why the redundancy notices had been issued before the Queen had been laid to rest and said this would not have been the King’s doing.
Clarence House hasn't sacked anyone at the top of the article and at the bottom they've sacked 100.

If you believe everything on the internet you'll get lead up the garden path.

UnSubRocky
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:25 pm
Location: Yaamba, Q

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by UnSubRocky » Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:46 am

Six months since Charles became king. Already I don't want him to make it to his coronation.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11787
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by Super Nova » Tue Mar 28, 2023 12:09 am

Oh let the UK have their tourist attraction.

They are all irrelevant accept for tourist dollars and filling up the tabloids.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

UnSubRocky
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:25 pm
Location: Yaamba, Q

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by UnSubRocky » Tue Jul 11, 2023 5:18 am

I wish someone would sack Bobby. Just to see what kind of facial expressions he would make. Fark I'm drunk!

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18243
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers

Post by Bobby » Tue Jul 11, 2023 7:30 am

UnSubRocky wrote:
Tue Jul 11, 2023 5:18 am
I wish someone would sack Bobby. Just to see what kind of facial expressions he would make. Fark I'm drunk!

You drunken bum - you're getting like Monk.


Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 23 guests