Charles to sack 100 royal workers
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- Bobby
- Posts: 18243
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Charles to sack 100 royal workers
King Charles inherited over 38 billion pounds
but he reckons he's short of a quid:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/queen-eli ... -1.6582244
King Charles's staff told during mourning they could lose jobs
Up to 100 household employees at Clarence House affected,
published media report says
Thomson Reuters · Posted: Sep 14, 2022 7:26 AM ET | Last Updated: 2 hours ago
The Public and Commercial Services Union condemned the decision to announce
redundancies during the mourning period as "heartless."
King Charles's staff told during mourning they could lose jobs
The notifications were issued even as they were working to assist the new King during the accession process
but he reckons he's short of a quid:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/queen-eli ... -1.6582244
King Charles's staff told during mourning they could lose jobs
Up to 100 household employees at Clarence House affected,
published media report says
Thomson Reuters · Posted: Sep 14, 2022 7:26 AM ET | Last Updated: 2 hours ago
The Public and Commercial Services Union condemned the decision to announce
redundancies during the mourning period as "heartless."
King Charles's staff told during mourning they could lose jobs
The notifications were issued even as they were working to assist the new King during the accession process
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:46 pm
Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers
But he will move to where the Queen lived so his old employees have nobody to look after. Is that what happened.
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2022 12:56 pm
Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers
The financial times reports
If you believe everything on the internet you'll get lead up the garden path.
and paragraphs later reportsClarence House said that the notice could affect as many as 100 employees, but “while some redundancies will be unavoidable”, the royal household was “working urgently to identify alternative roles for the greatest possible number of staff”.
Clarence House hasn't sacked anyone at the top of the article and at the bottom they've sacked 100.But they also questioned why the redundancy notices had been issued before the Queen had been laid to rest and said this would not have been the King’s doing.
If you believe everything on the internet you'll get lead up the garden path.
-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:25 pm
- Location: Yaamba, Q
Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers
Six months since Charles became king. Already I don't want him to make it to his coronation.
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers
Oh let the UK have their tourist attraction.
They are all irrelevant accept for tourist dollars and filling up the tabloids.
They are all irrelevant accept for tourist dollars and filling up the tabloids.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:25 pm
- Location: Yaamba, Q
Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers
I wish someone would sack Bobby. Just to see what kind of facial expressions he would make. Fark I'm drunk!
- Bobby
- Posts: 18243
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Charles to sack 100 royal workers
UnSubRocky wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2023 5:18 amI wish someone would sack Bobby. Just to see what kind of facial expressions he would make. Fark I'm drunk!
You drunken bum - you're getting like Monk.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 23 guests