Aussie wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 7:09 pm
I watched today.
He was selling this super/housing deposit thing on the basis that the super is 'your money,' so you get to use it (conditions apply) to buy your first house.
Yay. Yes, 'It's my money. So I get to use it. Yay!'
What a fake prick snake oil sales pitch that was.
"Sure, it's my money, but you will only let me use my fucking money that you have under your tight control when it suits you, but I don't get to use my money whenever it suits me, you fucker!"
Aussie you do realise that Paul Keating took this policy to market back in the early 1990's. It's a Labor initiative that he's resurrected.
Scomo stated at the Liberal Party Launch in Brisbane on the weekend that it will only be available to those qualifying 1st Home Owners wanting to buy their 1st home TO LIVE IN and it can go towards their deposit. Even then it's capped at 50K.
Essentially it's to give these people a chance to get over the line and secure a mortgage.
Interest rates have gone up AND lending criteria has tightened. So this is all about freeing a bit of cash for those trying to buy a property to live in.
Over the last few financial yrs there were around 100 000 first home owners out applying for a home loan. This number is expected to drastically reduce - hence this scheme.
I personally don't like the idea. Why? It's not enough to get first home owners over the line to meet the current strict lending criteria anyway. They won't be able to afford anything in Sydney.
Also I think it's a quiet way of pushing younger people out of Sydney into more affordable outer regions where houses and units are cheaper because they are cheaply and quickly made on small blocks of land and their capital appreciation rates are also low.
Here's a simple Sydney example to illustrate my point.
A 2 bedroom unit with 1 bathroom and 1 garage in Sydney is around 750K. I'm of course talking average area and an old style unit with the bare basics. It will probably require renovation. It's a realistic scenario though. For Sydney.
You need a 25% deposit to get over the line with a lender (because LMI is a no no plus they take into consideration stamp duty and conveyancing/legal and bank fees)
So you'll need 188K deposit up front.
What person in their 20's has that type of deposit lying around? They don't! Not unless mum n dad chip in along with any personal savings the 20 something has put together. Even then they'll be struggling.
That's where some super money would come in handy. However once again ... how much super does the average 20 something year old have? 20K? Maybe 30K tops. It's not going to be enough. Plus those who do qualify have to then pay that money back into their super fund IF/WHEN they sell their home.
The scheme MAY work if you buy something well out of Sydney but oh boy be careful doing that as petrol is climbing to $2 a litre and you'll be expected to cough up a lot in travelling costs (and tolls are pretty shocking now) to and from work. Unfortunately any real estate well out of Sydney FALLS easier so the risk of ending up with negative equity is there too.
Anyway ...when we were sitting down listening to Scomo deliver this so called reform for qualifying 1st Home Owners ..I immediately recalled Paul Keating in the 1990's doing the same thing as he entered election season during a recession.
Now Scomo is doing the same thing. And yes Australia IS in a severe recession now.
Unfortunately...Albanese has no experience in budgets or economics. And he has a lot of trouble remembering things. He's not a suitable replacement. And that's a shame.
This is why Australia is F U C K E D. And why everyone we know is laying low and restructuring their financial position so their money and assets are essentially invisible/as invisible as they can be.
Once we come out of recession AND a worthy Prime Minister who knows what he's talking about finally gets into position....then we'll be able to get back to where we left off. Until then...the word is to lay low and hibernate.