Net Zero effect

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Net Zero effect

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:41 pm

The effect of Net Zero CO2 emissions has Net Zero consequence on global warming.

I was under the impression that human activity caused 3% of atmospheric CO2 and nature was responsible for the remaining 97%, with roughly 90% emitted by zoo-plankton.
My father searched the topic on his phone and the almighty Google says humanity is responsible for 32% of atmospheric CO2.
I'm willing to stand corrected, so by the conventional hypothesis nature causes roughly 2/3rds of the current 400ppm.

In 2020 the Chinese army released (accidentally or deliberately is separate topic/issue) a weaponised bat virus now known as COVID19.
In a panic governments shut the world down and apparently there was a corresponding drop in CO2 emissions, yet atmospheric CO2 levels continued to rise.

Hello! ... is anybody awake out there .. gives everyone (except astrophysicists) a collective slap over the back of the head.
I'll repeat that just in case you missed it ... governments shut the world down and apparently there was a corresponding drop in CO2 emissions, yet atmospheric CO2 levels continued to rise.


This entire "Net Zero" show is a complete sham. If it was fair dinkum the restrictions would apply across the board, not just the developed/industrialised world. It's just another part of the Marxist agenda to destroy Westernised civilisation.

The real culprit for the cause of global warming is increased exposure to cosmic radiation from the centre of the Milky Way.
Our solar system is on an elliptic (like an egg) orbit around the galaxy and it takes 25,980 years to do 1 lap.
When we're near the ends of the ellipse we experience colder weather and are more prone to the formation of ice ages.
Every 12,990 years (maybe why 13 is considered an unlucky number) our solar system is closer to the centre of the galaxy, which has constant star and planet forming explosions - sort of like a never ending big bang - which charge up our sun, which in turn bombards us with increased levels of charged particles - mostly electrons and protons, but not a counter-balancing level of neutrinos.

These electrons increase magma intensity and weaken our magnetosphere - which protects us from cosmic radiation.
Increased magma intensity means more volcanic activity and most volcanoes are in the oceans.
Warmer water creates increased phyto-plankton growth and more favourable breeding conditions for zoo-plankton, which now have more phyto-plankton to eat. Zoo-plankton breath oxygen and exhale CO2. Warmer water expels CO2 into the atmosphere.

CO2 doesn't cause global warming. Global warming causes increased amounts of CO2 and the geological record indicates the heating precedes the CO2 increase by 800 years.

Atmospheric CO2 is currently 400ppm. When atmospheric CO2 was 4000ppm the planet froze over.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests