Immigration simplified using gumballs

[Black Orchid]

"Immigration can never be an effective or significant way to deal with the suffering people of the world. They have to be helped where they live. 99.9% of them will never be able to immigrate to a rich country. There's no hope for that. The only place that 99.9% of these people can be helped is where they live."

Every year the US takes in 1 million people from impoverished countries and every year these same impoverished countries added, births over deaths, 80 million people to their population.

Do the math.

[Black Orchid]

Short version ...

[Valkie]

The only cure

The one sure fire way to stop and prevent further poverty

Is to stop poor countries breeding.

Not genocide, not murder, not war, simply stop them breeding.

Imagine, if we introduced compolsory sterilization to any country that had too many people to be able to be supported by their own country.
In just 10 years, poverty would be around 25% less.
In 20 years, better than 50% of poverty would be around.
In 25 years, perhaps 30 years, poverty would be virtually non existent.

No more need to waste money on charity giving food and water to breeding machines who will never have any chance of being anything more than a breeding machine.

Who, in their right mind, would bring a child into the world.
Knowing that the child would suffer starvation, disease and have virtually zero chance of being anything other than a parasite all their lives?
Would you have a child if you knew they might well starve or die of thurst?
Would you have a child if you knew they would spend their whole life suffering and begging for food.
Would you briing a child into the world where you knew your child would be just one of billions who would struggle to live and die Young unfullfilled.

I don't give to these charities because I do not want to be the cause of suffering of millions.
Because every time you help one person survive, they breed more children, who breed more chikdren, who breed more children adinfinitum.

[BigP]

The only cure

The one sure fire way to stop and prevent further poverty

Is to stop poor countries breeding.

Not genocide, not murder, not war, simply stop them breeding.

Imagine, if we introduced compolsory sterilization to any country that had too many people to be able to be supported by their own country.
In just 10 years, poverty would be around 25% less.
In 20 years, better than 50% of poverty would be around.
In 25 years, perhaps 30 years, poverty would be virtually non existent.

No more need to waste money on charity giving food and water to breeding machines who will never have any chance of being anything more than a breeding machine.

Who, in their right mind, would bring a child into the world.
Knowing that the child would suffer starvation, disease and have virtually zero chance of being anything other than a parasite all their lives?
Would you have a child if you knew they might well starve or die of thurst?
Would you have a child if you knew they would spend their whole life suffering and begging for food.
Would you briing a child into the world where you knew your child would be just one of billions who would struggle to live and die Young unfullfilled.

I don't give to these charities because I do not want to be the cause of suffering of millions.
Because every time you help one person survive, they breed more children, who breed more chikdren, who breed more children adinfinitum.

Ozpol ban you for a bit Valk ?

[Black Orchid]

Being underweight and malnourished is supposed to suppress fertility yet the poverty stricken breed like flies.

[Valkie]

The only cure

The one sure fire way to stop and prevent further poverty

Is to stop poor countries breeding.

Not genocide, not murder, not war, simply stop them breeding.

Imagine, if we introduced compolsory sterilization to any country that had too many people to be able to be supported by their own country.
In just 10 years, poverty would be around 25% less.
In 20 years, better than 50% of poverty would be around.
In 25 years, perhaps 30 years, poverty would be virtually non existent.

No more need to waste money on charity giving food and water to breeding machines who will never have any chance of being anything more than a breeding machine.

Who, in their right mind, would bring a child into the world.
Knowing that the child would suffer starvation, disease and have virtually zero chance of being anything other than a parasite all their lives?
Would you have a child if you knew they might well starve or die of thurst?
Would you have a child if you knew they would spend their whole life suffering and begging for food.
Would you briing a child into the world where you knew your child would be just one of billions who would struggle to live and die Young unfullfilled.

I don't give to these charities because I do not want to be the cause of suffering of millions.
Because every time you help one person survive, they breed more children, who breed more chikdren, who breed more children adinfinitum.

Ozpol ban you for a bit Valk ?

No, why do you ask?

[BigP]

The only cure

The one sure fire way to stop and prevent further poverty

Is to stop poor countries breeding.

Not genocide, not murder, not war, simply stop them breeding.

Imagine, if we introduced compolsory sterilization to any country that had too many people to be able to be supported by their own country.
In just 10 years, poverty would be around 25% less.
In 20 years, better than 50% of poverty would be around.
In 25 years, perhaps 30 years, poverty would be virtually non existent.

No more need to waste money on charity giving food and water to breeding machines who will never have any chance of being anything more than a breeding machine.

Who, in their right mind, would bring a child into the world.
Knowing that the child would suffer starvation, disease and have virtually zero chance of being anything other than a parasite all their lives?
Would you have a child if you knew they might well starve or die of thurst?
Would you have a child if you knew they would spend their whole life suffering and begging for food.
Would you briing a child into the world where you knew your child would be just one of billions who would struggle to live and die Young unfullfilled.

I don't give to these charities because I do not want to be the cause of suffering of millions.
Because every time you help one person survive, they breed more children, who breed more chikdren, who breed more children adinfinitum.

Ozpol ban you for a bit Valk ?

No, why do you ask?

Again just a bit of humor, The more paranoid posters here think that every newbie that turns up is probably someone that has been banned from Ozpol taking on a new ID lol

[Black Orchid]

Again just a bit of humor, The more paranoid posters here think that every newbie that turns up is probably someone that has been banned from Ozpol taking on a new ID lol

That's not true P. One particular member banned from HERE keeps turning up with a new ID hoping to read what he can't see. That is far from every newbie . It's one particular nutter (who is also at OzPol) and who is permanently banned from HERE and continues to try to gain access in order to close us down due to his very unstable obsession.

I monitor new members but I let 'Mohawk' through just to prove the point that the idiot is not as smart as he thinks he is and also to prove what an outright liar he is.

[Nicole]

The only cure

The one sure fire way to stop and prevent further poverty

Is to stop poor countries breeding.

Not genocide, not murder, not war, simply stop them breeding.

Imagine, if we introduced compolsory sterilization to any country that had too many people to be able to be supported by their own country.
In just 10 years, poverty would be around 25% less.
In 20 years, better than 50% of poverty would be around.
In 25 years, perhaps 30 years, poverty would be virtually non existent.

No more need to waste money on charity giving food and water to breeding machines who will never have any chance of being anything more than a breeding machine.

Hi valkie,

Good to read you again. The population of Ethiopia has doubled in 20 years. We keep propping them up with aid, and they keep breeding. From memory, the current population of Ethiopia is 88 million. What will happen if we continue to allow this to happen by propping such countries up with aid.

Your post goes right to the heart of the issue: population. Too many fucking people.

[Valkie]

The only cure

The one sure fire way to stop and prevent further poverty

Is to stop poor countries breeding.

Not genocide, not murder, not war, simply stop them breeding.

Imagine, if we introduced compolsory sterilization to any country that had too many people to be able to be supported by their own country.
In just 10 years, poverty would be around 25% less.
In 20 years, better than 50% of poverty would be around.
In 25 years, perhaps 30 years, poverty would be virtually non existent.

No more need to waste money on charity giving food and water to breeding machines who will never have any chance of being anything more than a breeding machine.

Hi valkie,

Good to read you again. The population of Ethiopia has doubled in 20 years. We keep propping them up with aid, and they keep breeding. From memory, the current population of Ethiopia is 88 million. What will happen if we continue to allow this to happen by propping such countries up with aid.

Your post goes right to the heart of the issue: population. Too many fucking people.

Nature generally solves the problem by natural means.
Once a particular species starts to become too many
The food source becomes insufficient
Result
It dies out to a sustainable number.

Lions have a specific ratio of x number. Vs the number of prey.
When too many breed, they attack the food source until it becomes insufficient
Then the Lions die out.

We, as a species, are so stupid that we don't see the problem.
We attempt, stupidly, to sustain other humans where that natural process should be cutting in.
The final result is that some humans will have to do nothing but produce food for a population who cannot grow or produce their own.
Eventually, if not brought into chack soon, even the ones who have the means, will start to struggle to maintain a sustainable food source.
The human race may well destroy the planet, it's resources, Flora and fauna
Simply because we will not allow nature to control it's numbers naturally

But to say this makes me a bad person apparently..
Go figure?