Difference between Labor and fib parties

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
Jovial Monk

Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by Jovial Monk » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:00 pm

Today Horatio made his valedictory speech. Rudd was there and spoke for 10 minutes in reply to Horatio. Julia was there: wow, the PM & Deputy PM plus quite a few other Labor figures.

Let us go back a few years. Kim Beazley making his valedictory speech. Was the PM there? Nope, Howard too fucking scummy to make the gesture (Beazley had been in Parlt like 27 years!) Was the Deputy Fib there? Nope, Tip was asleep in the hammock. Only Robb was there, Minister on duty, plus two anonymous backbenchers. Horatio joined the crappy little group of fibs in the Chamber.

At the end of the speech the public galleries clapped, Robb and the backbenchers clapped along with them. Horatio didn't.

Gee, the Fibs just fucking suck don't they? No manners, no courtesy, no feelings. Scum.

Today, the schmalz was laid on with a trowel. If you can find a replay of that 2 hours (IIRC) in the HoR you will see Horatio appreciated Rudd's speech in reply more than the confected crap Truffles mouthed.

Fibs suck, bigtime!

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by boxy » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:07 pm

Your fawning sickens me.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Jovial Monk

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by Jovial Monk » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:09 pm

Compare today and when Beazley made his valedictory.

You know, get some facts?

Jubial Priest

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by Jubial Priest » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:09 pm

Drunk again, you sad old fuck?

Beazley didn't do anything but eat in the dining room for 27 years. No one fucking cared he was gone. Even his own fucking party couldn't wait till he fucked off.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by boxy » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:13 pm

I have this theory, JM is a paid, Liberal party mole, sent in to make Labor supporters cringe whenever they consider agreeing with such a moron. Same in reverse for deepy... paid Labor plant, making conservative pundits look like psychotic, stalking bastards.



I mean, who would devote so much time to being complete dickheads in public, unless they weren't being paid handsomely for it.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Jovial Monk

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by Jovial Monk » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:14 pm

and boxy thinks he would make a good moderator?

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by boxy » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:16 pm

Non sequitur :D
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Jubial Priest

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by Jubial Priest » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:17 pm

Actually DT puts together a lot better arguments and opinions coupled to a sense of humour than the meandering drivel spat forth in a constant drunken rage by this fuckwit. You can almost see the text dribbling down his chin


Jubial Priest

Re: Difference between Labor and fib parties

Post by Jubial Priest » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:21 pm

How would you think without other peoples opinion pieces hey Monk?

I expect you wouldn't

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 75 guests