Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote for

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote for

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:11 pm

:rofl

Shorten gets up but doesn't have the support of the ALP membership.

Kevni's land mines are still blowing up in the ALPs face :rofl
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Chard
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 3:05 pm
Location: Mein Führer! I can walk!

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by Chard » Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:33 pm

Ok, just checking if myy my Australian Political Basics is right, but as I understand it your citizens and elect representitives in that he form of MPs, who in turn elect major politifal positions amongst themselves along party lines?

If the above is basically correct, than what matter if the MPs you elect in turn elect someone you disagree with, as the system is essentially working as designed?
Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy the FEAR to attack. - Dr. Strangelove

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by freediver » Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:15 pm

People are guided by who the party leader is, partly because they dictate party policy. It is not like the US system where MPs cross the floor on a regular basis.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:20 pm

Before the last election the party internally elected who they think is the best to lead them, voted for and along internal petty lines and factions. After the last election just gone, the left leaning ALP changed the rules because they were throwing out leaders whilst in govt like old diapers-changed twice, 1st time because 50% of the party thought he was psychotic and the 2nd time because she was shit in the eyes of the public for lying. So now the caucus has 50% weighting and the membership has 50%.

It could have been worse...imagine a popularly elected leader by the membership trying to lead a party that the caucus didn't want? I actually joined and voted for the most useless guy :rofl

All it serves is for ammunition for their opponents. Not that it worries me. I'm not exactly a fan of left leaning parties or their politics.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

wog_girl

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by wog_girl » Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:09 pm

The unions made sure that their puppets remain in control. Screw what the people want - apparently. Good to see the union stranglehold on Labor continue. Shame about the majority of Australians who aren't union monkeys. The Greens look better by the day.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:44 pm

Steady on, I think I prefer the outright thuggery of the ALP than the outright buggary of the Greens., although its really the same shit sandwich.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Hebe
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 6:49 pm

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by Hebe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:28 am

The new ALP leader was chosen by members, whether directly voting or by people they'd already voted in.

And I suspect union membership will rocket up once Abetz gets his hands on IR. The ALP was built by the unions and workers.

It's not the unions they need to be wary of. It's the factions.
The better I get to know people, the more I find myself loving dogs.

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Labor elects a leader who 60% of their own wouldn't vote

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:15 pm

The way I see it, the mining industry got the unions to shaft Rudd to abate his proposed mining tax, and install Gillard because her incompetence made her controllable/malleable via the unions or Howes directly.
If Labor had stood their ground rather than allow themselves to be manipulated by external forces, they could have remained in power for a long time, simply because Howard $#@+ on so many people who had previously supported him.

Shorten, Albanese? .. doesn't really matter, Labor is destined to remain in the wastelands for quite a while into the future now.

I'm glad Peter Beatie failed to gain a seat, that prick has cost every Qlder roughly $1000 or more with his force council amalgamations. Supposedly to save money, but has sent viable councils with million$ in the bank into debt and massively reduced Qlders representation.

Now Labor has appointed rabid feminazi Tanya Plibersek (sp?) as deputy, not because she has talent or ability but because of what's between her legs.

AFAIC Labor deserves to remain in the wasteland, and it wouldn't bother me in the slightest if then never get elected again, anywhere.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 95 guests