well I guess this will upset a few

[Rorschach]

... Meanwhile back to Hanson's "gifted" Trump's swearing in tickets ... turns out Hanson's had Rod Culleton begging for those tickets on numerous occasions via our Embassy since October.
Nope nothing to do with that idiot Culleton he's been out of the party and too busy trying to stave off bankruptcy.
Not much to do with Hanson either it was Malcolm Roberts off his own back who was calling around to see if he could score some tickets for the party.

Note the time frame - October - is prior to Trump winning the election, which suggests Hanson's advisor (James Ashby) knew the same thing I did - that the polls predicting a Clinton win were a sham.

But the begging for tickets (by Hanson crew) and then Pauline twittering "I've just been gifted ..." and "What an honour ..." means she's traded whatever integrity she had for bullshit with glitter.

Good story but not factually true.

And to back me up...
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/ ... tu3bb.html

You might, and only might,I AM RIGHT>>>>> be correct on Roberts rather than Culleton. I'll have to check Thursday's Australian again, but I'm reasonably confident the article said Culleton, and it'd make sense too for Culleton rather than Roberts to blow the whistle, because Culleton's on the outer (Hanson agreed with the govt about Culleton's validity as a senator). he's a total dick and should be a long way away from my parliament...

Trump's crew says the story is true. It certainly seems to be Roberts isn't denying it.
Of course pollies and cohorts aren't known for honesty, but neither are you. Well that's a lie, and uncalled for.
In this instance, the matter is really too petty to bother bullshitting about on the Trump crew side,
but appears to be very worthy of bullshitting about on the Hanson crew side. No bullshitting involved. You just got it wrong it wasn't Culleton. I like getting things factually correct.

I realise you don't like Trump, but that's because you don't have a mind of your own. You realise nothing. I like his speech yesterday, I'm wordering who wrote it for him. I don't like that he's a buffoon and keeps changing his stories all the time, but I'm hoping he will be good for America.
You let the commentariat/political hacks do your thinking for you, as illustrated by your constant posting of op-eds. Nope... wrong again... I post articles with facts in them facts that agree with my pov.... because I got sick of idiots like Monk and Aussie saying prove it to me every time I just posted my opinion on things.
So when the commentariat says Trump is a neanderthal, you post "Trump is a buffoon". He is....
Yet the character you posit as a ridiculous person is extremely successful, and you are not at all successful. I wasn't gifted with a real estate fortune etc like Trump was... so if I'm unsuccessful... how successful are you by that measure? hmmmm or are you just being nasty and hypocritical for no good reason?

I believe Hanson started out with integrity but has let James Ashby sell it for bullshit with glitter. Hanson suffers from not being able to pick winners.... eg Culleton was her Captain's pick. Ashby somehow ingratiated himself to her... she's a sucker and believes almost everything people tell her. I know I've seen it in person close up.
The party itself is beginning to fracture, in a large part due to loss of integrity. Not yet.... now you are spouting media rubbish. The cracks now apparent in the media were there from soon after Ashby gained her confidence. Nelson thought he had Hanson's ear... its been a problem since she first got into politics.
One nation is becoming just like any other party - full of shit. Not yet... But it certainly needs good people to join, it is rebuilding from being almost dead and a lot of those are the chaff from the past. It certainly needs someone to take hold of policy creation and get some sense in there. I also don't see why you feel so threatened you need to personally attack me when I don't attack you.

[Rorschach]

A couple of links to where all these graphs and stuff came from would have been appreciated.

this thread is about being invited to the Presidential Inauguration

rorschach seem to have trouble with that..
[although if you dare to go off topic on one of his topics he sure complains about it extremely loudly]..

dont tell me you as well.. I thought you had better manners than that red..

YOU cods are the reason I had to post that information... wake up to yourself or go back to ozpol where lying is normal.

[cods]

A couple of links to where all these graphs and stuff came from would have been appreciated.

this thread is about being invited to the Presidential Inauguration

rorschach seem to have trouble with that..
[although if you dare to go off topic on one of his topics he sure complains about it extremely loudly]..

dont tell me you as well.. I thought you had better manners than that red..

YOU cods are the reason I had to post that information... wake up to yourself or go back to ozpol where lying is normal.

well only red was interested in that information that has not a thing to do with thread..

seems to me its someone else who needs to wake up..

if you cant stick to the op.. please feel free to start your own thread with maps a graphs.,..

and you and red can bore out and sort out the worlds financial problems..

[Rorschach]

Yes they sure are!

Dont look in the mirror cods as you will surely see one!

Seems the GFC that only Australia dodged by spending to boost the economy, never occurred in cods mind.

It was never global either....

so amusing..you have missed your calling.

SO YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN THIS VAGUE PRONOUNCEMENT THEN
OR DID YOU JUST LIE?
PERHAPS YOU ALSO NEED TO MENTION WHO YOU ARE TALKIN TO.

you mean like you do....duh!

the vague message was about the comment to a vague message from red... who was trying to be smart

he didnt realise he was talking to YOU...

so wheres the comment I have made about the gfc??????...

I dont explain anything to nobodies

not my job.

if you need every post explained you have come to the wrong place.
when you make a decent comment you may who knows??? get a decent reply in return...

got it?.

Oh I know how things work
Apparently YOU don't.
If you comment on the previous post you don't have to post a name to identify who you are posting to.
You can even quote the person you are replying to.
If you don't post a name and there are multiple voices its taken that the last voice is the one you are replying to.
But If you post as you did in answer to my previous post and don't add a name.... well YOU just make things freakin difficult and confusing, if you wanted to question or comment on red you should have quoted his post not mine.
No wonder people in forums think you are dense.

[Rorschach]

I am very sorry cods!

I know what the topic was about but Roach went berserk with graphs and shit, I just wanted to read the sources and reasons why the Australian Parliament acted as they did!.

I actually wondered if Labor would have instigated all the GFC initiatives without being advised to do so by the Department of Finance and the RBA,

I sort of doubted they would but Roach is obviously a friggin genius on what happened!

I guess we will never know!

I have searched his sources and they seem dodgie BTW!

None of them are dodgie you disingenuous twat... they are based on facts from well known economic organisations.

Now Where was I... oh yes Cods that idiot you apologised to.

here you go cods...
I said

IT WASN'T GLOBAL EITHER in reply to red

You replied
so amusing..you have missed your calling.

To which I replied
Really?
and posted all the appropriate information. If that doesn't clear things up for you then maybe you should just stay in the dementia ward.

[cods]

so amusing you have missed your calling..

whats to explain?...

keep pounding that keyboard.

I have to bake a cake for my grandson..cheers..

[Rorschach]

so my post has disappeared... one more time then eh.
cant face the truth eh cods... then just runaway... much better than me having to answer or correct the rot you write.