Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Post
by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Dec 03, 2015 3:23 pm
mellie wrote:Shortens hands are far from clean.
Indeed, but they're all dodgey.
Gillard took union kickbacks and made payments on her house, plus set up Craig Thomson's slush fund.
Interesting that Thomson stole $400k and is in gaol/jail, but Kathy Jackson stole $1.4mil and gets to keep her house.
As for Malcolm "water privatisation" Turnbull, well his role in Oz's largest corporate failure - collapse of HIH - is about to have some potentially dirty laundry aired.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
-
mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Post
by mantra » Thu Dec 03, 2015 7:46 pm
They're all susceptible to corruption - aside from the Greens who don't appear to have any criminals amongst them so far. The major parties believe rorting is OK - they just use different excuses to justify it. Neither party shows any restraint.
-
Black Orchid
- Posts: 25822
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Post
by Black Orchid » Fri Dec 04, 2015 6:03 pm
I only skimmed the link above but I noticed that Nova Peris has claimed more for "family travel expenses" than Bill Shorten, Barnaby Joyce, Julie Bishop, Joe Hockey or Tanya Pilbersek. Suck it dry while you can Nova?
Adam Bandt had spent $323,697 on "office fit outs". Once again I only skimmed the list but I didn't notice any other "office fit outs".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf10c/bf10c0e823dbc428e88d161e46e49887d6f52bec" alt="Shocked :shock:"
-
mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Post
by mantra » Sat Dec 05, 2015 7:10 am
Joyce spent twice the amount on office fit outs than Bandt, not that it makes any difference in the scheme of things. These expenses can't be justified while most voters are struggling to keep their heads above water financially.
The latest expenditure report for MPs and senators found that Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce had the highest total, registering $1,073,991.45 in expenses during the period, followed by Justice Minister Michael Keenan and Foreign Minister Julie Bishop.
Mr Joyce also claimed the largest amount on office fit outs, totalling more than $670,000.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-03/f ... es/6999498
-
Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Post
by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:30 pm
Outlaw Yogi wrote:mellie wrote:Shortens hands are far from clean.
Indeed, but they're all dodgey.
Gillard took union kickbacks and made payments on her house, plus set up Craig Thomson's slush fund.
Interesting that Thomson stole $400k and is in gaol/jail, but Kathy Jackson stole $1.4mil and gets to keep her house.
As for Malcolm "water privatisation" Turnbull, well his role in Oz's largest corporate failure - collapse of HIH - is about to have some potentially dirty laundry aired.
CORRECTION: Gillard took union kickbacks and used it for renovations on her house, plus set up Bruce Wilson's slush fund.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
-
mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Post
by mantra » Fri Dec 18, 2015 7:50 pm
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Gillard took union kickbacks and used it for renovations on her house, plus set up Bruce Wilson's slush fund.
All solicitors prepare dodgy contracts at some time or other. It's how they earn a living. As far as the $5,000 given to her for home renovations, why would she question it? No doubt her boyfriend had plenty of cash at the time and she didn't even think about it. She was cleared anyway.
-
Black Orchid
- Posts: 25822
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Post
by Black Orchid » Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:42 am
You would be hard pushed trying to find a politician from either side nowadays who didn't take kick backs or use their position for personal gain.
It's the whole reason they choose politics. None of them care about Australia or Australians anymore. They only care about what can get out of it.
-
skippy
- Posts: 5239
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm
Post
by skippy » Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:22 pm
I'm not sure today's announcements will be seen as good decisions by Malcolm.
A Minister resigning and Brough finally "stepping aside" doesn't look too good.
He also has the Nationals on the war path undermining him.
Brough should have been dumped weeks ago.
Lucky for Malcolm he has a numpty like Shorten as opposition leader.
http://www.news.com.au/national/politic ... 246c86964d
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:36 pm
Meh...plenty of ministerial resignations and reshuffles have occurred in the past due to behaviour and travel rorts etc. Howard lost heaps in his first term.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Post
by mantra » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:01 am
There are calls to restore Abbott to the front bench - and that isn't a bad idea. Turnbull has at least gotten rid of 2 unreliable ministers so there is a gap that needs to be filled. If Turnbull has got the guts to do that, then it will show that he's confident in himself and doesn't feel threatened.
Malcolm Turnbull is being urged to restore former prime minister Tony Abbott to a prominent frontbench position when the Prime Minister reshuffles his ministry - likely in February following the resignations of junior ministers Jamie Briggs and Mal Brough.
Read more:
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal ... z3vpBdyVI2
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 54 guests