Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:20 pm

Ignoramuses and morons!

Malaysia and Indo have not signed the UNHCR Convention. ASs there may not work, have to stay in camps etc.

There is one other country in SE Asia that HAS signed the UNHCR Convention? Any of the incandescent intellects here know what country that is?

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25811
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:23 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:Under the Malaysian Regional Processing Centre refugees there could work, get their kids educated, have access to much better health facilities than now and they will know they are in a queue and will be resettled.
Jovial Monk wrote:Ignoramuses and morons!

Malaysia and Indo have not signed the UNHCR Convention. ASs there may not work, have to stay in camps etc.
So, which is it?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Rorschach » Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:30 pm

:bgrin
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:03 pm

We were talking about why ASs left Indo in unsafe boats. I have given you the reason.

As part of the Malaysian Regional Processing Centre the ASs being processed there would be granted rights—to work etc—until they were taken to Australia.

Comparing apples and oranges as you did BO is not a clever thing to do.

Anybody know the one SE Asian country to sign the UNHCR Convention?
Last edited by Jovial Monk on Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25811
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:10 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:Comparing apples and oranges as you did BO is not a clever thing to do.
I merely pointed out 2 totally contradictory statements by yourself. So don't talk to me about 'clever'

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:20 pm

Apples and oranges.

Picked the one country (besides Oz & NZ) where ASs can settle yet? Google is your friend if you actually don’t know.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25811
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:24 pm

I don't read all of your posts Monk. Sorry

Perhaps you should open your doors and allow them to settle in your home? It had better be good enough though or you will find yourself before the courts :rofl

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:36 pm

The other country is Cambodia, doesn’t anyone besides my self read up on a subject they are debating? Cambodia is too poor to resettle any but a token number of ASs.

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:38 pm

If it is any consolation DeepshiT is as big an unthinking ignoramus as the rest, talking of “country shopping” as he does. You now know Malaysia and Indo are not places where ASs can settle.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25811
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:39 pm

But but but YOU said they could work in Malaysia!!!

That was my only point!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests