Liberal premier backs gay marriage

[AiA in Atlanta]

50% support in polls doesn't necessarily translate to the voting both and can have the opposite effect on contentious issue

You realize gay marriage is legal in several American states because of popular support, don't you? Yes, there are regions in the US that do not support it and those areas have historically lagged behind the times ...

Yeah, that's the equivalent of saying "well, Tasmania and the ACT have done it- that must mean they are representative of the majority. The others just lag behind because they dont yet have the majority of their population on the dole or public purse"

You may want to consider a move to Alabama. Wonderful place. For regressives.

[Rorschach]

What makes you think what you claim is progressive actually is?

[AiA in Atlanta]

What makes you think what you claim is progressive actually is?

Ever been to Alabama?

[Rorschach]

It's a stupid question... like demanding I find examples of a left handed society

that's worse than your last attempt boxy

You made claims I asked for examples... you have none.
Why? because your claims are based on a false premise.

[Rorschach]

What makes you think what you claim is progressive actually is?

Ever been to Alabama?

Got nothing eh?

[Aussie]

because your claims are based on a false premise.

What false premise? Now......your obligation is to answer that question of mine, before you say or do anything else.

[Rorschach]

A letter to Turnbull...

Gay marriage

Honestly, who are the people of Wentworth? The question is... do they understand the proposition?

The issue isn't about homophobia or human rights. It is about lifestyle, choice, tradition and in some cases (perhaps, the majority) of Religion.

I know lots of people who are homosexual and guess what... they don't want to get married. Most "gay" people do not seek marriage. So who are you supposedly representing? The choice to be "gay" automatically excludes one from MARRIAGE, that being the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, a commitment to monogamy, the initiation of the natural family unit.

Face it choosing a "gay" lifestyle or relationship excludes one from having a family in the NATURAL context. IE a man and a woman, (husband and wife), having children. The tradition of marriage is based on this natural order. If I chose to be gay, I would accept this fact. No one is excluding anyone or trampling on anyone's human rights. No more than a Vegan is prevented from eating meat... it is a choice, made by the individual. Choices have consequences. If I choose to play Cricket, I cannot then expect everyone to call it Football, just because I wish it.

As long as same sex relationships are afforded the same legal rights as heterosexual relationships (and they do) then, lets all stop the pandering to a vocal minority who seek to change the language and the meaning of our words and get on with life.

[Rorschach]

because your claims are based on a false premise.

What false premise? Now......your obligation is to answer that question of mine, before you say or do anything else.

You are so disappointing I knew you'd try that shit on.

You have failed yet again boxy to answer my questions from pages ago.
If you want answers go read the 2 major posts I already put up here.

The false premise/s are in what you wrote or have you forgotten already.

[Rorschach]

Honestly boxy you people have nothing.

pathetic.

[Aussie]

because your claims are based on a false premise.

What false premise? Now......your obligation is to answer that question of mine, before you say or do anything else.

You are so disappointing I knew you'd try that shit on.

You have failed yet again boxy to answer my questions from pages ago.
If you want answers go read the 2 major posts I already put up here.

The false premise/s are in what you wrote or have you forgotten already.