Ashby

[mantra]

Why don't you tell us all why it would be such a big deal if Abbott knew 10 hours before? 5 hors before? 2 hours before 10 minutes before? before what... ?

It is no big deal if Abbott knew beforehand, but isn't this "debate" over Abbott being innocent of these charges? He likes to portray himself as an "honest" man, so he needs to tell the truth occasionally. This is why he has such a high disapproval rating. Gillard shouldn't be any competition if she's as bad as the RW's continually claim - but she's still preferred PM. What does that tell you? That Abbott is more dishonest than she is?

[Grendel]

Abbott knew, Mantra.

[IQS.RLOW]

Abbott knew, Mantra.

No evidence

[Jovial Monk]

Evidence, codeine addict? 63% disapproval, a cover up unravelling even before the govt enquiry is under way, no policies is pretty good evidence to me.

As the election draws closer the electorate has to consider the despised Abbott as PM. It will prove too awful to contemplate and support will move from Lib to Labor. I have bet $500 on this so am confident.

[IQS.RLOW]

So, no evidence...


55:45

[Jovial Monk]

Abbott knew, Mantra.

No evidence

There is evidence. MSM will have to report that Abbott wrote his press release (actually, a PR firm) wrote the press release before the Lewis story appeared anywhere, on–line or dead tree. It is the cover gets you, just ask Nixon.

[mantra]

Abbott knew, Mantra.

Like a lot of political issues which are hidden - real proof will be hard to obtain, so we have to surmise that going by Abbott's history of persecuting the opposition, he is guilty.

Pity Aussie wasn't around because this would apply in regard to Abbott's guilt.

preponderance of the evidence n. the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence

[IQS.RLOW]

So again...no evidence

Not a skerrick.
Not one iota.
Nada
Zip
Zilch
Bupkis

[Jovial Monk]

Proof Abbott knew is here: http://sortius-is-a-geek.com/?p=2626

BTW with a ten hour time difference between server and workstation no authentication can be done, Not So Super is bullshitting.

[Grendel]

So again...no evidence

Not a skerrick.
Not one iota.
Nada
Zip
Zilch
Bupkis

As with the AWU, no evidence

Not a skerrick.
Not one iota.
Nada
Zip
Zilch
Bupkis

Abbott knew!