Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
Another dry gully. FWA have been fishing in one. The Brothels have got nothing, and Thomson's clear denials remain unchallenged.
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
It is CHRISTMAS, Aussie. Nobody cares where your little mate got his rocks off, or how he paid for it.Aussie wrote:Another dry gully. FWA have been fishing in one. The Brothels have got nothing, and Thomson's clear denials remain unchallenged.
Question (out of interest) ... Do you think it is OK for a married man to PAY a prostitute for sex?
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
I could not care less about it. I don't blame any bloke if he has to pay for what his Wife either won't, or can't deliver. WTF has that got to do with the piss and wind allegations against Thomson?Do you think it is OK for a married man to PAY a prostitute for sex?
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
IF you don't understand the question, Aussie, it has a LOT to say about your morals and definition of the sanction of marriage.Aussie wrote:I could not care less about it. I don't blame any bloke if he has to pay for what his Wife either won't, or can't deliver. WTF has that got to do with the piss and wind allegations against Thomson?Do you think it is OK for a married man to PAY a prostitute for sex?
I didn't ask you a personal question as I care less what you actually "do". However, your reply
indicates a fault within you.
IF a man "needs" extra sex, he does not have to PAY for it. Unless he is extremely ugly and/or fat plus a PITA and if the latter, surely the wife would walk?
Thomson is a creep. Are you?
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
You asked me a question:
Even though it has NIL to do with the Topic, I answered it:Do you think it is OK for a married man to PAY a prostitute for sex?
I could not care less about it. I don't blame any bloke if he has to pay for what his Wife either won't, or can't deliver.
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
IQS.RLOW wrote:I see Aussie is ignoring this thread now.
C'mon Aussie, where's your Christmas spirit?
Was this just all piss and wind?Or did you spend your time penning that post with nothing but a moral vacuum behind it?Here is my concession. I am willing to draw a line in the sand for what has been done in the past concerning that conduct.
You sell yourself as a man of moral conviction.
Are you prepared to step up to the plate you yourself have laid?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
Aussie wrote:You asked me a question:
Do you think it is OK for a married man to PAY a prostitute for sex?
Even though it has NIL to do with the Topic, I answered it:
I could not care less about it. I don't blame any bloke if he has to pay for what his Wife either won't, or can't deliver.
Exactly.
Then I said:
So? Are you? Please answer the MAIN question that is NOT off topic.IF you don't understand the question, Aussie, it has a LOT to say about your morals and definition of the sanction of marriage.
I didn't ask you a personal question as I care less what you actually "do". However, your reply
indicates a fault within you.
IF a man "needs" extra sex, he does not have to PAY for it. Unless he is extremely ugly and/or fat plus a PITA and if the latter, surely the wife would walk?
Thomson is a creep. Are you?

- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
Aussie wrote:I could not care less about it. I don't blame any bloke if he has to pay for what his Wife either won't, or can't deliver. WTF has that got to do with the piss and wind allegations against Thomson?Do you think it is OK for a married man to PAY a prostitute for sex?
Damn I wonder how she got pregnant then...?
I don't expect any video on Thomson after so long, they probably rotate the tape.
But I don't for one minute believe his story. Who in their right mind would?
Arsie doesn't seem to be a very empathetic or compassionate person either Nef... did you see his response to the woman who committed suicide because of the DJs prank.
Last edited by Rorschach on Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
Naffy, I have no idea what you are referring to as the 'main' question. Roach, is this still a keyboard issue:

But I don't for one minute belief his story

- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Fair Work begins court action against Thomson
no goober that's a typo
it's capitals remember..
you are such a prat... but if that makes you feel like a winner hey.... hope it makes your day

obviously you are not one for changing Arsie so as far as I'm concerned... NO TRUCE up yours and you aint seen nothin yet.
it's capitals remember..
you are such a prat... but if that makes you feel like a winner hey.... hope it makes your day



obviously you are not one for changing Arsie so as far as I'm concerned... NO TRUCE up yours and you aint seen nothin yet.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests