Labor falls to historic lows: Newspoll

[mellie]

Mel, one question

Do you believe in man induced climate change?, just yes or no will do.

Climate change, yes, of course we the human race have cause damage, but is anyone thinking that there is also a natural process going on?
If there is anyone here that has a bit of a scientific mind or even watch doco's on this subject, you will recall that with the ice core drill samples we are moving into another iceage period, it's as clear as the smurk on low IQ's face,
no, none of us want more taxing because with this "Carbon tax" they are actually taxing the air we breath, no two ways about it, the only way to stop smog in the atmosphere is to make everything with robotics as they do in Japan.

A moment of silence for Japan if you will after the major earthquake and severe tsunami that has hit.

there is no way we can effectively control carbon, and the hole in the atmosphere, it has always been there over the south pole.

I already answered him Viking, I think he missed my response...and likewise, I am incline to agree with you on a few points there, sure humans are harming the environment, though don't think the church of climatology headed by Al Gore is the solution, for one, we are currently enduring a cycle of cooling, and what happens when the earth temperature cools, lower than years gone past?

It cracks, water expands, hence the cyclic tremors I think.

When water freezes, does not ice expand?

Fact is, we are attempting to impose an unconstitutional tax based on a theory, one with more holes in it than a Skips underpants.

More research required.

Al Gore claimed we are warming, though refuses to answer questions concerning our current cooling ...so lets call it "Climate Change" instead...because any change confirms their theory yes?

Weather, atmosphere, the environment itself is forever changing, always has, always will.

So rather than slog people a tax for things we cant change, how about we focus on the things we can...other factors which harm our immediate environment, like asbestos under high schools and toxic waste dumps... increasing dioxin levels in our produce and water supply...heavy metals, other pollutants which the Greens for some reason have forgotten about.

[Outlaw Yogi]

So we keep having record high temps, polar regions and glaciers are in meltdown, but the world is cooling.

$#!+, next you'll be telling us how to cook our dinner in a chest freezer.

[mellie]

Just in...

The latest telephone Morgan Poll conducted over the last three nights, March 8-10, 2011, shows on a Two-Party preferred basis the L-NP (55.5%, up 4%) now has a large lead over the ALP (44.5%, down 4%). • A clear majority of electors (57%) oppose the Gillard Government's proposed legislation to 'place a price on carbon.' • A large majority of electors (72%) agree that Prime Minister Gillard lied about the proposed carbon tax before the Federal election when she stated 'There will be no carbon tax under the Government I lead.' • Opinion is divided on Opposition Leader Tony Abbott's promise 'to rescind' the Government's proposed 'carbon tax' legislation if the Liberal Party is elected: 46% support rescinding the legislation cf. 42% oppose rescinding the legislation. Also released today is a Face-to-Face Morgan Poll taken over the last two weekends (February 26/27 & March 8/10, 2011) but before today's telephone Morgan Poll. It shows the L-NP (51.5%) ahead of the ALP (48.5%) on a Two-Party preferred basis. However, if taken week by week, the ALP (51.5%) cf. L-NP (48.5%) was slightly ahead during the first weekend of interviewing (February 26/27, 2011) but the L-NP support increased significantly since then with the L-NP (54%) cf. ALP (46%) now clearly ahead on the weekend of March 5/6, 2011. It is worth noting that both weekends of interviewing took place after Prime Minister Gillard announced the proposal for the 'carbon tax' on Thursday February 24, 2011.