Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding?IQS.RLOW wrote:Lets hear you have a big sooky cry about the ALP no longer supporting a conscience vote.![]()
Rightys= let everyone have a say.
Leftys= Nazi fucks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b91cc/b91cceaa4df5776401b2cef8ca0bfad53948cbb3" alt="smack head :smack"
Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding?IQS.RLOW wrote:Lets hear you have a big sooky cry about the ALP no longer supporting a conscience vote.![]()
Rightys= let everyone have a say.
Leftys= Nazi fucks.
Same reason Lib votes are always conscience votes, unlike the BaaaaALP who squibbed it because the confusion would have the numpties heads exploding if they had to think for themselves.J o h n S m i t h wrote:Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding?IQS.RLOW wrote:Lets hear you have a big sooky cry about the ALP no longer supporting a conscience vote.![]()
Rightys= let everyone have a say.
Leftys= Nazi fucks.
IQS.RLOW wrote:Same reason Lib votes are always conscience votes, unlike the BaaaaALP who squibbed it because the confusion would have the numpties heads exploding if they had to think for themselves.J o h n S m i t h wrote:Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding?IQS.RLOW wrote:Lets hear you have a big sooky cry about the ALP no longer supporting a conscience vote.![]()
Rightys= let everyone have a say.
Leftys= Nazi fucks.
Because Plebiscites are NON-BINDING.... why ask this crap over and over again then say you know that?Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding
Rorschach wrote:J o h n S m i t h wrote:rubbish. Not supporting the pleb has nothing to do with it. The pleb is a $50m waste of money. Several MP's have already said they'll vote NO regardless of the pleb result. If that's going to be the case, why waste money on the pleb? Make it legally binding and labor has said they will support it, otherwise, better to put the money elsewhere. What is the no camp so afraid of that they won't make the result binding?Outlaw Yogi wrote:J o h n S m i t h wrote:and yet every single poll for almost the last decade has shown that the majority of people think gays should be allowed to marry.Outlaw Yogi wrote:I think Gay marriage should be disallowed because it's "culturally insensitive" to the majority of the population.![]()
No, only the selective surveys come out with a pro gay marriage result.
All the real polls say no, nine, nyit, non, not phuking on.
If the polls DID as you claim consistently give a result of support, the queers and ALP would support the plebiscite.
It's that simple.
Letting the voice of the people actually be heard is never a waste of money.
ALP seem to be leading you around by the nose.
For starters they now don't want a plebiscite they want a pollie vote. Why because they think they have the numbers... despite your several MPs.
Nope, they are afraid the people will not support SSM, despite all the crap they go on about being in the majority.Plebs are not binding.... how many times must you be told.Plebiscites have the advantage of being inherently democratic. According to Labor's Nicola Roxon, "you cannot go wrong by simply asking the Australian people what they think – and put the decision in their hands."
Referenda are for the Constitution they are binding. They are binding plebiscites.You need to stop listening to the ALP crap.Voting in referenda is compulsory. Referenda are binding on the government. A plebiscite is sometimes called an 'advisory referendum' because the government does not have to act upon its decision. Plebiscites do not deal with Constitutional questions but issues on which the government seeks approval to act, or not act.Aug 21, 2015
Rorschach wrote:THE PROBLEM IS YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE.... YOU HAVE NO REFUTATION AND NO IDEA. STOP WASTING MY TIME.J o h n S m i t h wrote:It's a $50 MILLION waste of money.Rorschach wrote: Letting the voice of the people actually be heard is never a waste of money
NO IT IS NOT....
what are you? stupid? I know they're not binding. That's my whole argument.Rorschach wrote: Plebs are not binding.... how many times must you be told.
NO I AM NOT. YOU HOWEVER ARE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT KETTLE OF FISH. THE FACT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'VE BEEN TOLD MANY TIMES SO FAR IS TOTALLY UNBELIEVABLE.you need to stop pretending you have a clue.Rorschach wrote: You need to stop listening to the ALP crap.
it is if you don't listen to it.Rorschach wrote: Letting the voice of the people actually be heard is never a waste of money.
of course you are. You prove it day in, day outRorschach wrote:NO I AM NOT.
then you need to attend English classes. I've explained why problem with it, in detail. If you struggle with it ask mummy to help you.Rorschach wrote:YOU HAVE NO REFUTATION AND NO IDEA.
fkk of fidiot. Its not hard to make it binding. You do realise govt. has the power to make/create and amend laws, right?Rorschach wrote:Oh for goodness sake... how many times must you be told.
Because Plebiscites are NON-BINDING.... why ask this crap over and over again then say you know that?Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding
Rorschach wrote:Oh for goodness sake... how many times must you be told.
Because Plebiscites are NON-BINDING.... why ask this crap over and over again then say you know that?Why are you afraid to make the pleb binding
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests